tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21597890.post25756793569429823..comments2024-03-17T08:25:33.806+00:00Comments on Thoughts of Francis Turretin: Response to Anonymous Diatribe against TheonomyTurretinfanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01802277110253897379noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21597890.post-68286702108992396482008-12-12T20:58:00.000+00:002008-12-12T20:58:00.000+00:00Brother Gene,I have responded to your comment in a...Brother Gene,<BR/><BR/>I have responded to your comment in a new post (<A HREF="http://turretinfan.blogspot.com/2008/11/clarification-on-tri-partite-division.html" REL="nofollow">here</A>).<BR/><BR/>-TurretinFanTurretinfanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01802277110253897379noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21597890.post-41223352706971454372008-11-01T21:16:00.000+00:002008-11-01T21:16:00.000+00:00The prohibition on garments of mixed fibres was a ...<I>The prohibition on garments of mixed fibres was a ceremonial law pointing to separation and physical purity. It was fulfilled in Christ, who was free from impurities.</I><BR/><BR/>Actually, this would, as I recall, be a concrete instance of the moral law. Wearing clothes of two fibers would have been, in that society, a signal one believed in sympathetic magic. It's on the same level as the GeneMBridgeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10504383610477532374noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21597890.post-63069949613755822042008-10-31T22:47:00.000+00:002008-10-31T22:47:00.000+00:00yep, TF: "....and watch it dematerialize."Yep, I d...yep, TF: "....and watch it dematerialize."<BR/><BR/>Yep, I did indeed watch it dematerialize.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com