tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21597890.post5448572821742579368..comments2024-03-17T08:25:33.806+00:00Comments on Thoughts of Francis Turretin: False Dichotomy Between Infallible Church and "Subjective, Individualistic" ConclusionsTurretinfanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01802277110253897379noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21597890.post-69535401232116833922010-11-27T17:44:06.551+00:002010-11-27T17:44:06.551+00:00Hi, TF!
here's my own private and personal op...Hi, TF!<br /><br /><a href="http://orthodox-apologetics.blogspot.com/2010/10/sola-scriptura.html?showComment=1290554699098#c5648814369330198847" rel="nofollow">here's</a> my own private and personal opinion on the matter. :-)The Blogger Formerly Known As Lvkahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09663692507774640889noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21597890.post-18812130426531149692010-11-25T16:15:44.957+00:002010-11-25T16:15:44.957+00:00Well said, Mr. Turretin. I especially liked your p...Well said, Mr. Turretin. I especially liked your pointing out that there are portions of books at debate as well, not just which books.<br /><br />I'm with Beowulf2k8 as well. The canon is still fallible. The church did just fine without thinking that its spiritual health somehow depends on a defined canon! The very thought is bizarre.<br /><br />Finally, what you said about the sheep hearingPaulhttp://www.christian-history.org/scripture-quotes.htmlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21597890.post-46984935260201796262010-11-24T23:33:34.038+00:002010-11-24T23:33:34.038+00:00Ok, back and pondering this thread more deeply.
A...Ok, back and pondering this thread more deeply.<br /><br /><i>And then, after the Reformation comes along, Trent tries to infallibly define the canon.</i><br /><br />In Dr. J.V. Fesko's book, <b><i>Justification, Understanding the Classic Reformed Doctrine</i></b>, P&R Publishers, Dr. Fesko develops an idea for our consideration and <a rel="nofollow">accurate it is</a>, page 394:<br /><brAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21597890.post-10478691322318881322010-11-24T21:08:41.847+00:002010-11-24T21:08:41.847+00:00For me, without giving much concentration to this ...For me, without giving much concentration to this thread, yet, in a hurry right now because my wife is pressing me to stop what I am doing and come with her, so in haste, when reading this by Bryan I comment:<br /><br /><i>If we deny that the Church has such a gift [a gift (or charism) of infallibility in matters of faith and morals], then we are left with a subjective, individualistic, “changes Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21597890.post-74650859603050591982010-11-24T18:47:48.440+00:002010-11-24T18:47:48.440+00:00"The Roman church did not claim to infallibly..."The Roman church did not claim to infallibly define the canon of Scripture before Trent, and yet people (both in the Roman communion and outside it) felt perfectly comfortable having a <b><i>fallible</i></b> canon. It worked for over 1500 years."<br /><br />We'd be better off if we realized that canon is still fallible.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com