tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21597890.post8052178332556606920..comments2024-03-17T08:25:33.806+00:00Comments on Thoughts of Francis Turretin: Peter has spoken thus through Leo!Turretinfanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01802277110253897379noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21597890.post-48591964274985936742011-05-06T00:33:59.973+01:002011-05-06T00:33:59.973+01:00Paradidomia (aka tradition):
Yes, there is a lot ...Paradidomia (aka tradition):<br /><br />Yes, there is a lot of redundancy and overlap in their words. Consider, for example, "this is the faith of the apostles" and "so taught the apostles."<br /><br />Or again: "this is the faith of the fathers" (identically repeated twice)<br /><br />You asked: "Why do they need to even mention Leo if he is just quoting Turretinfanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01802277110253897379noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21597890.post-29863774096229362242011-05-05T22:08:22.834+01:002011-05-05T22:08:22.834+01:00====
Peter has spoken thus through Leo. So taught ...====<br />Peter has spoken thus through Leo. So taught the Apostles. <br />=====<br /><br />Your argument that Peter has spoken is a reference to Leo quoting scripture seems to me to render the fathers words as being redundant since "Peter has spoken thus through Leo" would actually be the same thing as "So taught the Apostles"<br /><br />according to your point of view.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com