Saturday, November 11, 2023
"Futurus" and "To come"
›
Can the Latin word "futurus" sometimes be a translation of "to come"? Interestingly, the answer is that it depends on t...
Friday, November 10, 2023
Beza, Plato, and the "Shall Be" Speculative Restoration at Revelation 16:5
›
Beza speculatively replaced "ὅσιος" with "ἐσόμενος" in Revelation 16:5. Sometimes advocates of the King James Version (...
Euthymius Protasecretis against Images
›
I came across this beautiful text from a Greek-speaking author with whom I'm not familiar. It is interesting for a variety of reasons, ...
1 comment:
James Arminius on the Canon of Scripture
›
Those who know me, know I don't endorse anything on the grounds that Arminius said it. However, since Arminius has recently been accuse...
1 comment:
Monday, November 06, 2023
Theodore Beza's Annotations at Revelation 1:4, 1:8, 4:8, 11:17, and 16:5
›
The following is a very lightly edited transcription of Beza's annotations at Revelation 1:4 as found in his 1598 edition ( link )( comp...
Thursday, October 26, 2023
Theodore Beza at Revelation 15:3
›
At Revelation 15:3, Beza has a textual note in his 1598 text, which seems wildly inaccurate, at best: (Zoomed into the relevant portion) (...
Monday, October 23, 2023
The Ge'ez (Ethiopic) Witness to the Text of Revelation 16:5
›
Statement of the Issue In the last decade, the Ethiopic has sometimes been brought out as an alleged versional witness to Beza's amende...
‹
›
Home
View web version