John Chrysostom, Homily IV on Paul's Second Epistle to the Thessalonians:
"Because if he meant to say the Spirit, he would not have spoken obscurely, but plainly, that even now the grace of of the Spirit, that is the gifts, withhold [the AntiChrist]. And otherwise he ought to have come, if he was about to come when the gifts ceased: for they have long since ceased."
This comment is a bit of a fly in the ointment of those who claim that the spiritual gifts have not ceased, but is also a bit of a fly in the ointment for those who think that Christians were unable to tell that prophecy had ceased, and that the only revelation they could work from was that had been committed to writing and providentially preserved by God. That is not to say that there may not be some Christians who had difficulty discerning imitations in the first few generations after the apostles.
It's also a bit of a fly in the ointment for those who assert that their church has continually had prophets since the days of the apostles, as some "Orthodox" have apparently asserted, pointing to the mystical experiences of ascetic monks on Mt. Athos and in other places.
I'm sure that modern "charismatics" have developed an explanation for the absence of positive historical evidence of the continuation of the gifts, possibly along the lines that those of the "Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints" (who also claim to have living prophets in their midst).
-Turretinfan
Saturday, October 20, 2007
3 comments:
Comment Guidelines:
1. Thanks for posting a comment. Without you, this blog would not be interactive.
2. Please be polite. That doesn't mean you have to use kid gloves, but please try not to flame others, even if they are heretics, infidels, or worse.
3. If you insult me, I'm more likely to delete your comment than if you butter me up. After all, I'm human. I prefer praise to insults. If you prefer insults, there's something wrong with you.
4. Please be concise. The comment box is not your blog. Your blog is your blog. If you have a really long comment, post it on your blog and post a short summary of it here.
5. Please don't just spam. It's one thing to be concise, it's another thing to simply use the comment box to advertise.
6. Please note, by commenting here, you are relinquishing your (C) in your comments to me.
7. Remember that you will give an account on judgment day for your words, including those typed in comment boxes. Try to write so you will not be ashamed if it is read back before the entire world.
8. Stay on topic. If your comment has nothing to do with the post, email it to me (my email can be obtained through my blogger profile), or simply don't post it.
9. Don't post as "Anonymous." If you are going to post anonymously, at least use some kind of recognizable "handle," so we can tell you apart from all the other anonymous folks. (This is moot at the moment, since recent abuse has forced me to turn off "anonymous" commenting.)
10. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; and abstain from doing to others what you would not wish upon yourself.
On Chrysostom:
ReplyDeleteWould you suggest (allegedly with Chrysostom) that the grace of the Spirit is exclusively manifested as "the [Spiritual] gifts" such as those described in 1 Cor 12? If so, what make you of common grace, or even regenerative grace and sanctifying grace?
On your comments:
1) Are there some who claim (per your second paragraph) that early Christians were unable to discern true from false? I was not aware that there are some who make this claim. It seems contrary to what a "charismatic" might argue, because "discernment" is one of the spriritual gifts. I note that if all gifts have ceased, then indeed discernment also no longer occurs.
2) Your third paragraph strongly suggests that you see no real difference between the charismatic churches (and perhaps also those who attend such churches) and the Mormons. Is this correct?
Perfect timimng for me on this quote.
ReplyDeleteI just posted about Gerry Matatics at Beggars All and noted my confusion with the emphasis placed on extrabiblical prophecies (particularly from "Our Lady"). I wonder if there is anything like this found in the early writings?
Dear TJ,
ReplyDeleteTJ: "Would you suggest (allegedly with Chrysostom) that the grace of the Spirit is exclusively manifested as "the [Spiritual] gifts" such as those described in 1 Cor 12?"
I respond:
No. I don't think that J.Chrys. was saying that, and I wasn't saying that either.
TJ: "1) Are there some who claim (per your second paragraph) that early Christians were unable to discern true from false?"
I respond:
Yes - not all early Christians, but some.
TJ: "It seems contrary to what a "charismatic" might argue, because "discernment" is one of the spriritual gifts. I note that if all gifts have ceased, then indeed discernment also no longer occurs."
I respond:
Clearly your latter sentence would seem to be correct. Discernment of spirits as an extraordinary gift would have ceased. The claim is that early Christians post-cessation were sometimes fooled by fakes.
TJ: "2) Your third paragraph strongly suggests that you see no real difference between the charismatic churches (and perhaps also those who attend such churches) and the Mormons. Is this correct?"
I respond:
No. That's not the point of the paragraph at all. The point of the paragraph is that presumably charismatics are not such fools as to have failed to come up with some kind of explanation - perhaps along the same lines as the Mormons who - as I recall - really had to deal with the matter first.
There must have been some attempt to extract the fly.
But the fly is really much more of a problem for those who venerate J.Chrys. and yet claim that they have a continual succession of prophets on Mt. Athos.
That was really the point of the post.
-Turretinfan