I think more than a few folks can relate to the situation illustrated here (link).
If people around you both misinterpret what you write, and refuse to accept your clarifications of what you write, what chance is there that such people are going to understand what you wrote?
A similar phenomenon happens in the reading of Scripture.
Folks read it, see what they want to see, and refuse to let the rest of Scripture correct their misunderstanding. This is a personal, subjective problem. It's not a problem with Scripture; it's not an objective problem. That's where the church (meaning the saints around us, whether our spirtual brethren, our spiritual fathers/mothers, or even sometimes our spiritual children) can help. The church helps fallibly, but it can help.
If, however, one decides that one's own reading ability (whether because it is one's own, or that of the sect to which one belongs) is infallible, then one can end up to an observer looking as ridiculous as the reader in the cartoon linked above.
-Turretinfan
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
11 comments:
Comment Guidelines:
1. Thanks for posting a comment. Without you, this blog would not be interactive.
2. Please be polite. That doesn't mean you have to use kid gloves, but please try not to flame others, even if they are heretics, infidels, or worse.
3. If you insult me, I'm more likely to delete your comment than if you butter me up. After all, I'm human. I prefer praise to insults. If you prefer insults, there's something wrong with you.
4. Please be concise. The comment box is not your blog. Your blog is your blog. If you have a really long comment, post it on your blog and post a short summary of it here.
5. Please don't just spam. It's one thing to be concise, it's another thing to simply use the comment box to advertise.
6. Please note, by commenting here, you are relinquishing your (C) in your comments to me.
7. Remember that you will give an account on judgment day for your words, including those typed in comment boxes. Try to write so you will not be ashamed if it is read back before the entire world.
8. Stay on topic. If your comment has nothing to do with the post, email it to me (my email can be obtained through my blogger profile), or simply don't post it.
9. Don't post as "Anonymous." If you are going to post anonymously, at least use some kind of recognizable "handle," so we can tell you apart from all the other anonymous folks. (This is moot at the moment, since recent abuse has forced me to turn off "anonymous" commenting.)
10. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; and abstain from doing to others what you would not wish upon yourself.
The cartoon could also illustrate that a person can be oblivious to the true meaning of what they write, via their own illiteracy and lack of logic.
ReplyDeleteSince the person who wrote the report is the hero of the cartoon series, that interpretation of the cartoon is unlikely to be correct (as being the purpose of the cartoonist's illustration).
ReplyDeleteIt is true that such a separate problem exists, namely that people sometimes people fail to say what they mean, or that people sometimes fail to understand the consequences (logical and other) of what they have written.
Those are objective problems, and Scripture - being objectively perfect - does not have those problems.
-Turretinfan
Obviously Scripture doesn't have that problem, but all systematic theologies do.
ReplyDeleteFrom what I've seen:
ReplyDeletea) non-systematic theologies are much more likely to have that problem than systematic theologies; and
b) when systematic theologies DO have that problem, it tends to be relatively infrequent.
Systematic theologies do contain mistakes (more or fewer), but usually systematic theologies do actually say what they mean and mean what they say.
On the other hand, many many readers experience the problem illustrated in the cartoon.
-Turretinfan
TF
ReplyDeleteyou reading my mind?
A blind man can lead blind people into a ditch! Only one seeing can lead them out of the ditch they were all blind too! Ah, unless maybe they just like being the only one seeing, then they will pass those damned blind people by leaving them in that damned predicament! :)
Let's hope that I'm correctly your "damned" in the sense of "on the road to hell," and not some other sense.
ReplyDelete-Turretinfan
TF
ReplyDeleteyes
question:
Presumably I am commenting to one of God's Elect now aren't I herein?
:)
But to support my position just in case:
Pro 10:24 What the wicked dreads will come upon him, but the desire of the righteous will be granted.
Pro 10:25 When the tempest passes, the wicked is no more, but the righteous is established forever.
question:
Do you believe Satan is blind as he works down here?
Dear Michael,
ReplyDeleteSatan is very dangerous and very clever. God may have, in God's exceeding mercy, blinded Satan to Satan's own doom, and Satan (in the book of Job) seems to have been blind as to certain matters of the heart.
-Turretinfan
TF
ReplyDeleteI do believe I am getting your point and you mine!
Have you visited the hotly contested kosmos debate?
I have been putting comments in over there and asking for your kindness in replying to my queries with mercy seeing you have nothing else to offer me?
Orthodox:
ReplyDeleteGot your comment.
Hit the reject button.
I publish thoughtful, reasonable, polite comments. That one didn't qualify under any of those categories. Sometimes I publish other comments as well, but if they fail under all three categories, their chances of getting to the "publish" button are slim.
-Turretinfan
Michael,
ReplyDeleteI'm busily preparing my response(s) to various comments on that debate.
I think a number of your comments started to head off in various tangents, so I may not be answering all of them.
If any are of particular interest to you, perhaps you won't mind redirecting my attention to them.
-Turretinfan