Sunday, August 03, 2008
Bentlism vs. Exclusive Psalmody
Now, for the comparison, watch the video embedded in this post (link).
One form of worship shows us the imitation of the world: the other shows the transformation of the world. One video shows man-made worship: the other inspired worship. One is the logical conclusion of strange-fire innovations in worship: the other a restoration of Orthopraxy.
Thankfully most folks who reject the Regulative Principle of Worship (or who consider the lyrics of praise merely an element) do not take it to this absurd logical conclusion.
-TurretinFan
P.S. It's worth noting that the Psalms are still sung in "Orthodox" churches, normally (if not always) as the Apostles would have done in the synagogues, a capella. There have been some innovative additions in the song of EO worship as well (various Troparia, for example), but less addition is found there (in that regard) than one finds in a typical church that has innovated more freely. A post today by the Romanian Orthodox poster, Lvka provides some examples: (link - there may be some objectionable icons in some of the still images that accompany the audio in the clips Lvka has embedded).
10 comments:
Comment Guidelines:
1. Thanks for posting a comment. Without you, this blog would not be interactive.
2. Please be polite. That doesn't mean you have to use kid gloves, but please try not to flame others, even if they are heretics, infidels, or worse.
3. If you insult me, I'm more likely to delete your comment than if you butter me up. After all, I'm human. I prefer praise to insults. If you prefer insults, there's something wrong with you.
4. Please be concise. The comment box is not your blog. Your blog is your blog. If you have a really long comment, post it on your blog and post a short summary of it here.
5. Please don't just spam. It's one thing to be concise, it's another thing to simply use the comment box to advertise.
6. Please note, by commenting here, you are relinquishing your (C) in your comments to me.
7. Remember that you will give an account on judgment day for your words, including those typed in comment boxes. Try to write so you will not be ashamed if it is read back before the entire world.
8. Stay on topic. If your comment has nothing to do with the post, email it to me (my email can be obtained through my blogger profile), or simply don't post it.
9. Don't post as "Anonymous." If you are going to post anonymously, at least use some kind of recognizable "handle," so we can tell you apart from all the other anonymous folks. (This is moot at the moment, since recent abuse has forced me to turn off "anonymous" commenting.)
10. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; and abstain from doing to others what you would not wish upon yourself.
It seems on several blogs this has become the topic and for good reason.
ReplyDeleteI have for weeks now been pondering these matters. Yesterday morning in my morning devotional time with the Lord I came to these words and believe there can be seen in them what we are witnessing when we listen to and watch these youtube clips on this supposedly Holy Ghost filled revival. I wonder if you too can see what I see when reading this:
Psa 44:1 To the choirmaster. A Maskil of the Sons of Korah. O God, we have heard with our ears, our fathers have told us, what deeds you performed in their days, in the days of old:
Psa 44:2 you with your own hand drove out the nations, but them you planted; you afflicted the peoples, but them you set free;
Psa 44:3 for not by their own sword did they win the land, nor did their own arm save them, but your right hand and your arm, and the light of your face, for you delighted in them.
Psa 44:4 You are my King, O God; ordain salvation for Jacob!
When I listen to and watch these youtube broadcasts I get a sense that these are succumbing to their own fleshly wills and expecting God to receive it as True Worship and Delight in Him? I sense rather a stumbling going on as they breakthrough to a hardening of their very soul thinking this is what God wants?
This is not what God wants.
Here rather would be some of what God wants from our young people today:
Psa 46:1 To the choirmaster. Of the Sons of Korah. According to Alamoth. A Song. God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble.
Psa 46:2 Therefore we will not fear though the earth gives way, though the mountains be moved into the heart of the sea,
Psa 46:3 though its waters roar and foam, though the mountains tremble at its swelling. Selah
Psa 46:4 There is a river whose streams make glad the city of God, the holy habitation of the Most High.
Psa 46:5 God is in the midst of her; she shall not be moved; God will help her when morning dawns.
Psa 46:6 The nations rage, the kingdoms totter; he utters his voice, the earth melts.
Psa 46:7 The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our fortress. Selah
Psa 46:8 Come, behold the works of the LORD, how he has brought desolations on the earth.
Psa 46:9 He makes wars cease to the end of the earth; he breaks the bow and shatters the spear; he burns the chariots with fire.
Psa 46:10 "Be still, and know that I am God. I will be exalted among the nations, I will be exalted in the earth!"
Psa 46:11 The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our fortress. Selah
It is as though they are poking their spiritual eyes out all the while shaming others for not seeing and understanding!
Hmmmmmmm
Oh well, onward True Believers, soldiers one and all!
Dear Francis,
ReplyDeleteOne thing I've never understood about the exclusive Psalmody position is, even if you only want to sing songs from the Bible, what's to stop you from singing songs from other parts of the Bible besides the Psalter? Why not sing the Magnificat, the Benedictus Deus, the Nunc Dimittis, the Canticle of Jonas, the Canticle of Anna, etc?
Dear Ben:
ReplyDeleteThe basic argument is that we are not trying simply to sing songs from the Bible (to avoid doctrinal error). If we were, singing other Biblical passages (Handel's Messiah for example) would accomplish that goal (since the Bible does not contain doctrinal errors).
Instead, we are seeking to worship God by singing those psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs intended for the worship of God. Such songs are those collected in the Psalter (i.e. the Book of Psalms).
Some have asserted that additional inspired songs were created during the Apostolic age, but the Holy Spirit did not see fit either to inspire a second volume of the Psalter, or to preserve any such newly inspired songs.
Thus, we simply use what we have been given, in an effort to worship God as God wishes to be worshipped (which method of worship we deduce from Scripture).
-TurretinFan
How are a bunch of unmoving (except for their mouths) white folk more inspired than a bunch of white folk spinning socks? (I'm white, by the way. Actually, I'm not white, I'm pink.)
ReplyDeleteIs your main objection that the young worship leader was singing a secular song (with the injection of "Jesus" into the lyrics) and the Reformed Presbyterians were singing Psalms? Or is it the different styles? (I suspect the former, based on the title of your post.) Admittedly a bit cheesy, but I don't see the abomination you seem to see. What if the Lakeland people were spinning socks to the Psalms?
I attended a PCUSA church for a decade, and though PCUSA theology is a bit off (not that church, however), the worship style was similar to the one you linked to. Though it can be beautiful at times, it got a bit boring after a while, since that's basically the only style they can come up with. No wonder people want to spin socks. God gave us bodies as well as voices, and if people want to use them to worship Him, what's wrong with that? Can we find a way to worship in Spirit and in Truth? Can we find some modern day "Levites" to put a little pizzazz into the Psalms?
I know little of the Lakeland phenomenon, other that what you linked, but from what I saw, I'm not as alarmed as you.
"Psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs." In your reply to Ben, you equated this with what was found in the Psalter. Does this mean the 150 Psalms? If so, then why did Paul use the terms "hymns" and "spiritual songs," in addition to "psalms?" Was he being redundant?
ReplyDeleteThe racial profiles of the group is a non-issue.
ReplyDeleteIt is not just an uninspired song,
It is not just a secular song,
It is a song of confusion,
It is a song of mindlessness, and
It is a disrespectful song when applied to my Lord.
The Lakeland problems become more apparent in some of the other videos I've linked.
Yes, the socks swinging is another feature that adds to the irreverance of the situation.
I can tell you this, I looked at the video of the conference of men and women singing psalms and I didn't see boredom on their faces.
Perhaps that's because they've recognized that worship is not about self-amusement - it is about glorifying God. But the performance at Lakeland is about picking a popular song to stir up and entertain the crowd.
The temple worship is over, but the synagogue worship continues.
-TurretinFan
"Psalms," "hymns," and "spiritual songs," are three categories of the songs found in the Psalter.
ReplyDeleteI had addressed that a while back, buried in miscellaneous criticisms of Exclusive Psalmody (link).
-TurretinFan
About the racial profiling: it was more of a cultural statement than racial. Sorry, I was being a little ornery. I'll try to restrain myself.
ReplyDeleteI'll have to look at the other videos. The "ecstasia" guy in the middle seemed creepy.
What did you mean by referring to the end of temple worship? That we're only to use our mouths, and not the rest of our bodies, to worship God (e.g., dancing)?
I'll read your link on the Exclusive Psalmody.
We can and do worship God with our bodies by for example standing, kneeling, or prostrating ourselves before him (as well as generally by being present in the congregation of the saints, and further in the sacraments of baptism and the Lord's Supper).
ReplyDeleteWhat I was primarily referring to was the fact that the solemn worship of God in the synagogue is what continues on today, not the temple on the mount covered in gold and and filled with musicians.
Granted that we can praise God in both song and dance, but dance is not part of the formal and solemn worship of God, but is instead an informal mode. Thus, David danced in praise, but it was so unusual (for a man) that Michal was upset and thought it below David's dignity.
-TurretinFan
Just listened to some Bentley violence on James White's podcast from a couple months ago. Pretty crazy. So God is like the bad Sensei on The Karate Kid? "Sweep the leg..." Yikes!
ReplyDelete