Thursday, August 21, 2008

Two Sola Scriptura Debate Transcripts

My own debate on Sola Scriptura with Mr. Bellisario is progressing at a snail's pace (link to debate) - the latest news being that late last night my cross-examination questions for Mr. Bellisario were posted.

For those champing at the bit (or chomping at it, if historical etymology is not important), here are two Sola Scriptura debate transcripts - both of which are rather substantial in terms of reading length.

Gerry Matatics vs. James White (1992)

James White vs. Patrick Madrid (1993)

Enjoy!

-TurretinFan

3 comments:

  1. Well, that was interesting TF.

    Here is something I caught.

    Mr. Matatics: [[It is a tradition of men. It was not taught in the early Church or in the first 15 centuries of church history--contrary to what Mr. White has said, and we will get into the details of his quotes, and the other things those Church Fathers said-- until Wycliffe and Luther invented this concept as a way of justifying their revolt against classical Christianity for their own purposes, and their own agenda.]]

    Here are two things, one, he obviously, for no apparent Good and Godly reason "bought" into that grudge against Luther and Wycliffe and two, isn't that a clear admission of an "agenda" in it's own right?

    Oh well. I guess it's ok for him to have an agenda and it is not ok for Dr. White?

    Here is one of my all time favorite passages of Scripture supporting our dearly beloved Dr. White and any one who will stand up and defend sola scriptura:

    Act 20:32 And now I commend you to God and to the word of his grace, which is able to build you up and to give you the inheritance among all those who are sanctified.

    I guess it goes without saying but hey, I will say it anyway, that Paul noted, God and the "Word" of His Grace. Fifteen centuries of classical Christianity, popery, is classical alright, but not, Christianity.


    I know I am not the brightest light bulb in the room, but, Acts 20:32, that's pretty clear to me, you?

    Sola Scriptura it is then!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ok, ok, maybe I should move on then?

    But, Mr. Matatics says this:
    [[He would agree that there were Apostles who never wrote any gospels or letters, so far as church history or the Scripture itself tells us.]]

    Wait a minute, huh?

    He was speaking that in 1992. Is there someone in the house over 2000 years old who can vouch for that fact, that is that other Apostles never wrote a gospel or a letter? Who would require anyone to establish whether or not they wrote or did not write? I would claim just the opposite based on the gospel writings and letters that have been preserved from that time period. It would seem to me that what we have and know factually as evidence supports the opposite even though there isn't any writing of those "who never wrote" that made it to these days.

    Now of course we do remember what John wrote:

    Joh 21:24 This is the disciple who is bearing witness about these things, and who has written these things, and we know that his testimony is true.
    Joh 21:25 Now there are also many other things that Jesus did. Were every one of them to be written, I suppose that the world itself could not contain the books that would be written.

    Oh boy, I think I am getting a bit idiotic now.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mr. Matatics: [[It is a tradition of men. It was not taught in the early Church or in the first 15 centuries of church history--contrary to what Mr. White has said, and we will get into the details of his quotes, and the other things those Church Fathers said-- until Wycliffe and Luther invented this concept as a way of justifying their revolt against classical Christianity for their own purposes, and their own agenda.]]

    If Matatics had been more familiar with the church fathers, he would not have made this claim. In fact, one sees the same doctrine of Sola Scriptura sprinkled throughout the writings of the early church.

    -TurretinFan

    ReplyDelete

Comment Guidelines:

1. Thanks for posting a comment. Without you, this blog would not be interactive.

2. Please be polite. That doesn't mean you have to use kid gloves, but please try not to flame others, even if they are heretics, infidels, or worse.

3. If you insult me, I'm more likely to delete your comment than if you butter me up. After all, I'm human. I prefer praise to insults. If you prefer insults, there's something wrong with you.

4. Please be concise. The comment box is not your blog. Your blog is your blog. If you have a really long comment, post it on your blog and post a short summary of it here.

5. Please don't just spam. It's one thing to be concise, it's another thing to simply use the comment box to advertise.

6. Please note, by commenting here, you are relinquishing your (C) in your comments to me.

7. Remember that you will give an account on judgment day for your words, including those typed in comment boxes. Try to write so you will not be ashamed if it is read back before the entire world.

8. Stay on topic. If your comment has nothing to do with the post, email it to me (my email can be obtained through my blogger profile), or simply don't post it.

9. Don't post as "Anonymous." If you are going to post anonymously, at least use some kind of recognizable "handle," so we can tell you apart from all the other anonymous folks. (This is moot at the moment, since recent abuse has forced me to turn off "anonymous" commenting.)

10. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; and abstain from doing to others what you would not wish upon yourself.