Wednesday, October 01, 2008

Proverbs 1:1

Proverbs 1:1 The proverbs of Solomon the son of David, king of Israel;

This verse provides both the title of the book and the author of the first and main section of the book. The author is King Solomon, himself the son of David. Both were the king of Israel. It may be grammatically an open issue of whether "king of Israel" is meant to refer to Solomon or David. I believe that the latter sense is the probable, but the ambiguity is of no consequence.

Some people have attempted to deny that Solomon was the author of the book. Their rationale is that Solomon turned from God. For it is written,

1 Kings 11:6-10
6And Solomon did evil in the sight of the LORD, and went not fully after the LORD, as did David his father. 7Then did Solomon build an high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab, in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and for Molech, the abomination of the children of Ammon. 8And likewise did he for all his strange wives, which burnt incense and sacrificed unto their gods. 9And the LORD was angry with Solomon, because his heart was turned from the LORD God of Israel, which had appeared unto him twice, 10And had commanded him concerning this thing, that he should not go after other gods: but he kept not that which the LORD commanded.

The reasoning continues that if Solomon turned away from God, then he was not saved, and that an unsaved person could not be an author of the Holy Scripture. This reasoning is weak in two regards:

1) Scripture indicates the punishment laid upon Solomon for his disobedience. That punishment was (a) taking the ten tribes away from Solomon's son's rule and (b) stirring up adversaries against Solomon.

2) Scripture concludes the account of Solomon in the book of Kings by stating:

1 Kings 11:41-42
41And the rest of the acts of Solomon, and all that he did, and his wisdom, are they not written in the book of the acts of Solomon? 42And the time that Solomon reigned in Jerusalem over all Israel was forty years.

And Scripture concludes the account of Solomon in the Chronicles of the Kings of Israel by stating:

2 Chronicals 9:29-31
29Now the rest of the acts of Solomon, first and last, are they not written in the book of Nathan the prophet, and in the prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite, and in the visions of Iddo the seer against Jeroboam the son of Nebat? 30And Solomon reigned in Jerusalem over all Israel forty years. 31And Solomon slept with his fathers, and he was buried in the city of David his father: and Rehoboam his son reigned in his stead.

Neither of these accounts suggest that Solomon died in ignominy, though of course that is not conclusive.

3) We are not told whether Solomon repented of his sin or not. The book of Proverbs itself speaks of repentance (see verse 23 of the first chapter, for example). This supports the idea that Solomon himself repented, though it is not conclusive.

4) There is no rule that Scripture must be written by saved men. The word of God has come by the mouth of a donkey and by mouth of King Saul, the suicide. Since we believe in verbal, plenary inspiration, it is irrelevant whether the prophet is himself a righteous or wicked man.

Original (Hebrew)
Proverbs 1:1
משׁלי שׁלמה בן־דוד מלך ישׂראל׃

LXX (Greek)
Proverbs 1:1
Παροιμίαι Σαλωμῶντος υἱοῦ Δαυιδ, ὃς ἐβασίλευσεν ἐν Ισραηλ,

Vulgate (Latin)
Proverbs 1:1
parabolae Salomonis filii David regis Israhel

3 comments:

  1. I assume the rationales are yours TF and making that assumption I will assert a third basic, base reason for the error of Solomon.

    King David.

    Now having made that assertion, I believe the argument some make is basic to all error, God as Sovereign and "Savior" and man being or allowed to temporarily usurp and act out as God, like Satan, who ascended up to this plateau, I will be like God.

    I do it every day. I am grateful for my daily dethroning! I am redeemable! Satan is not and so are not all who follow him, the god of this world.

    Solomon was afforded every leisure and calling. He was "set" to be King of Israel, as a sign and symbol of One True King whose Kingdom we are all of, those of us whom the Will of the Lord has revealed to our hearts and minds that Jesus indeed is the Christ, the Son of the Living God.

    I believe Solomon's sins were foreordained to be forgiven and he has died into the everlasting arms of the Same Savior we will die into when we too die into His Everlasting Arms.

    Solomon reminds me of one such as I am! And thank God for election! God has taken all the "work of Righteousness" out of our work of righteousness as the Book of Proverbs teaches!

    ReplyDelete
  2. TF, I'm curious what your thoughts would be with regard to your post here and the theory that Solomon authored Ecclesiastes at some very late point in his life (as in, at a point of repentance just prior to death.) From a literary standpoint, I think it fits, as Ecclesiastes seems to be the musing of one who has learned by experience that the world's dainties are all folly.

    ReplyDelete
  3. GR, good question.

    The issue of Solomonic authorship with Ecclesiastes is more pronounced than with Proverbs. Ecclesiastes, as you may recall, begins:

    Ecclesiastes 1:1 The words of the Preacher, the son of David, king in Jerusalem.

    Viewed next to Proverbs 1:1, it seems that "the Preacher" = Solomon. Furthermore, verse 12 states:

    Ecclesiastes 1:12 I the Preacher was king over Israel in Jerusalem.

    Of David's first generation sons, Solomon was the only one who was king over Jerusalem for any significant amount of time (Absalom briefly deposed his father, but was very quickly slain). It is true that it could be a regal grandson (or great-grandson, etc.) of David (recall that Jesus was a son of David), but again there is nothing in the text to hint that it is anyone other than Solomon.

    The fact that the text is backward-looking "was king," suggests that the author is looking back on his life at the end of his reign. Furthermore, the story told in the book of Ecclesiastes is one of a man who tried folly, but realized it was folly.

    Thus, I'd tend to agree with the comment you made.

    -TurretinFan

    ReplyDelete

Comment Guidelines:

1. Thanks for posting a comment. Without you, this blog would not be interactive.

2. Please be polite. That doesn't mean you have to use kid gloves, but please try not to flame others, even if they are heretics, infidels, or worse.

3. If you insult me, I'm more likely to delete your comment than if you butter me up. After all, I'm human. I prefer praise to insults. If you prefer insults, there's something wrong with you.

4. Please be concise. The comment box is not your blog. Your blog is your blog. If you have a really long comment, post it on your blog and post a short summary of it here.

5. Please don't just spam. It's one thing to be concise, it's another thing to simply use the comment box to advertise.

6. Please note, by commenting here, you are relinquishing your (C) in your comments to me.

7. Remember that you will give an account on judgment day for your words, including those typed in comment boxes. Try to write so you will not be ashamed if it is read back before the entire world.

8. Stay on topic. If your comment has nothing to do with the post, email it to me (my email can be obtained through my blogger profile), or simply don't post it.

9. Don't post as "Anonymous." If you are going to post anonymously, at least use some kind of recognizable "handle," so we can tell you apart from all the other anonymous folks. (This is moot at the moment, since recent abuse has forced me to turn off "anonymous" commenting.)

10. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; and abstain from doing to others what you would not wish upon yourself.