Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Indulgences are Back!
-TurretinFan
2 comments:
Comment Guidelines:
1. Thanks for posting a comment. Without you, this blog would not be interactive.
2. Please be polite. That doesn't mean you have to use kid gloves, but please try not to flame others, even if they are heretics, infidels, or worse.
3. If you insult me, I'm more likely to delete your comment than if you butter me up. After all, I'm human. I prefer praise to insults. If you prefer insults, there's something wrong with you.
4. Please be concise. The comment box is not your blog. Your blog is your blog. If you have a really long comment, post it on your blog and post a short summary of it here.
5. Please don't just spam. It's one thing to be concise, it's another thing to simply use the comment box to advertise.
6. Please note, by commenting here, you are relinquishing your (C) in your comments to me.
7. Remember that you will give an account on judgment day for your words, including those typed in comment boxes. Try to write so you will not be ashamed if it is read back before the entire world.
8. Stay on topic. If your comment has nothing to do with the post, email it to me (my email can be obtained through my blogger profile), or simply don't post it.
9. Don't post as "Anonymous." If you are going to post anonymously, at least use some kind of recognizable "handle," so we can tell you apart from all the other anonymous folks. (This is moot at the moment, since recent abuse has forced me to turn off "anonymous" commenting.)
10. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; and abstain from doing to others what you would not wish upon yourself.
Far from me to promote the NYT as a beacon of Catholic knowledge, I think their headline, though probably made in some ignorance, more importantly notes that while the embarassment of selling indulgences has caused the Church to be rather silent about them, there seems to be somewhat of a resurgence in their employment (albeit they are not sold).
ReplyDeleteIf I sound displeased that conversations are occurring about indulgences, it's because I am. Stress the need for interior conversion and leave it at that.
Kelly
ps. A Catholic theologian named Hans Kung wrote an article the other day dubbed 'If Obama were Pope...' Are you going to give it any attention here?
Kelly,
ReplyDeleteHans Kung is not a "Catholic theologian" in the sense of being an official theologian for the Roman church. He was - but when one questions papal infallibility, one finds oneself stripped of one's teaching authority (as far as Rome is concerned).
Hans Kung is a great example of the lack of unity within Catholicism - but not particularly useful as far as presenting Catholicism in its present official form.
-TurretinFan