Monday, March 16, 2009

Archbishop Rino Fisichella and Excommunication for Abortion

In a letter that certainly surprised me, Roman Catholic Archbishop Rino Fisichella criticized the equal application of his own church's law in the case of a young Brazilian girl who received an abortion (link to story about letter). Apparently, Mr. Fisichella believes that excommunication should not be automatic, since he believes that the murder of the girls unborn twins was necessary to save her "innocent life."
Remarkably, the article doesn't identify the odd double-standard of excommunicating the doctors and the girl's mother, but not excommunicating the man who incestuously raped his nine-year-old step-daughter, placing the mother in the dilemma of killing her grandchildren or risking the life of her daughter.
-TurretinFan

5 comments:

  1. It's not as simple as you allege.

    There is the question of coercion, and to what degree the mother was coerced. Until such a matter is settled, and since coercion is an important factor in Canon Law considerations, the mother's excommunication appears (I note "appears") rather knee-jerk.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Did I allege it was simple? I thought I alleged the opposite.

    ReplyDelete
  3. No, Kelly was quite right. You presented it as an open and shut case and hence just one more stick with which to beat Rome with.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ah, The Palm HQ - so what was the case, then, since you clearly have a better angle than I do on what I was presenting?

    -TurretinFan

    ReplyDelete
  5. One commenter, going by the nick "joveginny" provided a comment suggesting that my observation regarding the failure of the RCC to excoummincate the rapist was: "reckless" (no reason why was given, and none is evident) and that it "exhibits his ignorance of an understanding of the scope and extent of the precept of "excommunication" as defined in the Canon Law of the Church."

    This is one of those silly accusations that one encounters from folks who are embarassed by their own church's inability to deal consistently with things.

    To clarify, though, this is an external critique of Catholicism. The claim is not that rape of one's stepchildren is a matter of automatic excommunication within Rome's Code of Canon Law, but that if abortion is, such incestuous rape leading to abortion also ought to be.

    I would think this would be plain to most readers, but I realize that are some readers so desparate to defend their church that they will attempt to smear the critic with "ignorance" of something rather than simply acknowledge the error and move on.

    -TurretinFan

    P.S. Incidentally, the word verification things here have been quirky lately. This one is suggesting that I "tryperch" a very interesting suggestion during this Lenten season.

    ReplyDelete

Comment Guidelines:

1. Thanks for posting a comment. Without you, this blog would not be interactive.

2. Please be polite. That doesn't mean you have to use kid gloves, but please try not to flame others, even if they are heretics, infidels, or worse.

3. If you insult me, I'm more likely to delete your comment than if you butter me up. After all, I'm human. I prefer praise to insults. If you prefer insults, there's something wrong with you.

4. Please be concise. The comment box is not your blog. Your blog is your blog. If you have a really long comment, post it on your blog and post a short summary of it here.

5. Please don't just spam. It's one thing to be concise, it's another thing to simply use the comment box to advertise.

6. Please note, by commenting here, you are relinquishing your (C) in your comments to me.

7. Remember that you will give an account on judgment day for your words, including those typed in comment boxes. Try to write so you will not be ashamed if it is read back before the entire world.

8. Stay on topic. If your comment has nothing to do with the post, email it to me (my email can be obtained through my blogger profile), or simply don't post it.

9. Don't post as "Anonymous." If you are going to post anonymously, at least use some kind of recognizable "handle," so we can tell you apart from all the other anonymous folks. (This is moot at the moment, since recent abuse has forced me to turn off "anonymous" commenting.)

10. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; and abstain from doing to others what you would not wish upon yourself.