Monday, March 23, 2009

Vatican Editing & a Clear Conscience

I found an article complaining that the Vatican edited the remarks of the pope that were given during his recent visit to Africa (link). I was immediately reminded of this amusing clip (link). No doubt the remarks were edited for the perfectly innocent reason of reflecting "a version which represents the [pope's] views as he would, on reflection, have liked them to be."

-TurretinFan

UPDATE: In fairness, it looks like the American's White House is run by the same folks who work at the Vatican (link). Did they know there was a video? (one wonders)

8 comments:

  1. Or someone in the press office edited the Pope's words without the Pope's knowing it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Like you don't do the same thing for Luther

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ben:

    I wouldn't be the least surprised if the pope wasn't asked before the change wad made. In fact, I rather suspect that is the case.

    -TurretinFan

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous:

    What a silly comment.

    -TurretinFan

    ReplyDelete
  5. I wouldn't be the least surprised if the pope wasn't asked before the change wad made. In fact, I rather suspect that is the case.

    Dear Francis,

    In your post, you allege that this is the case "no doubt." How quickly suspicions become certainties, when their object is your favorite whipping boy.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I see what you mean. I meant that "no doubt" rhetorically. In fact, my suspicion is the opposite: namely that the explanation isn't innocent: the words were changed to make the pope say something more reasoanble (in the editor's view) than what he said.

    As noted above, I don't have any reason to think that the pope himself was consulted, though (of course) he is "responsible" for things that are put out in his name.

    -TurretinFan

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sorry, my eyes glossed over the n't in wasn't in your previous comment, so I thought you were saying the opposite of what you said.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I've done the same sort of thing myself many times. No harm, no foul.

    ReplyDelete

Comment Guidelines:

1. Thanks for posting a comment. Without you, this blog would not be interactive.

2. Please be polite. That doesn't mean you have to use kid gloves, but please try not to flame others, even if they are heretics, infidels, or worse.

3. If you insult me, I'm more likely to delete your comment than if you butter me up. After all, I'm human. I prefer praise to insults. If you prefer insults, there's something wrong with you.

4. Please be concise. The comment box is not your blog. Your blog is your blog. If you have a really long comment, post it on your blog and post a short summary of it here.

5. Please don't just spam. It's one thing to be concise, it's another thing to simply use the comment box to advertise.

6. Please note, by commenting here, you are relinquishing your (C) in your comments to me.

7. Remember that you will give an account on judgment day for your words, including those typed in comment boxes. Try to write so you will not be ashamed if it is read back before the entire world.

8. Stay on topic. If your comment has nothing to do with the post, email it to me (my email can be obtained through my blogger profile), or simply don't post it.

9. Don't post as "Anonymous." If you are going to post anonymously, at least use some kind of recognizable "handle," so we can tell you apart from all the other anonymous folks. (This is moot at the moment, since recent abuse has forced me to turn off "anonymous" commenting.)

10. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; and abstain from doing to others what you would not wish upon yourself.