Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Plunder the Philistines or Join them?
But the Hindu leaders praised Benedict XVI for this, rather than criticizing him for taking their scriptures in another sense than they were intended. Will we see clarification from the Vatican? I am guessing not. The zeitgeist of Vatican II is of meta-ecumenicism, which would avoid noting the fact that Catholicism must take these lines in a different sense, while promoting a semblance of unity.
I should note that Paul the Apostle plundered from the Greek poets, but when he did so he made clear that he was using these things either in the same or a different sense, depending on the context. He was not promoting ecumenicism with the Greek pagans, he was trying to convert them.
The reader can decide for themselves whether Benedict XVI was following in Paul's footsteps or departing from them.
-TurretinFan
UPDATE: Reginald di Piperno (Roman Catholic) has provided some factual corrections to the article linked above. (link to RdP's post) The basic point remains, as apparently it is not disputed that the various lines were spoken and that the references were welcomed by the Hindus. I'm also not sure whether RdP got the idea that plundering the Philistines is a good thing, whereas joining them is a bad thing.
UPDATE: In view of an amusing post at Ichabod, I've updated the post above a bit further (link).
8 comments:
Comment Guidelines:
1. Thanks for posting a comment. Without you, this blog would not be interactive.
2. Please be polite. That doesn't mean you have to use kid gloves, but please try not to flame others, even if they are heretics, infidels, or worse.
3. If you insult me, I'm more likely to delete your comment than if you butter me up. After all, I'm human. I prefer praise to insults. If you prefer insults, there's something wrong with you.
4. Please be concise. The comment box is not your blog. Your blog is your blog. If you have a really long comment, post it on your blog and post a short summary of it here.
5. Please don't just spam. It's one thing to be concise, it's another thing to simply use the comment box to advertise.
6. Please note, by commenting here, you are relinquishing your (C) in your comments to me.
7. Remember that you will give an account on judgment day for your words, including those typed in comment boxes. Try to write so you will not be ashamed if it is read back before the entire world.
8. Stay on topic. If your comment has nothing to do with the post, email it to me (my email can be obtained through my blogger profile), or simply don't post it.
9. Don't post as "Anonymous." If you are going to post anonymously, at least use some kind of recognizable "handle," so we can tell you apart from all the other anonymous folks. (This is moot at the moment, since recent abuse has forced me to turn off "anonymous" commenting.)
10. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; and abstain from doing to others what you would not wish upon yourself.
Well, those comments should raise some ire?
ReplyDeleteI am mindful of the Apostle Paul, who was not betwixted and between opinions here:::>
2Co 11:10 As the truth of Christ is in me, this boasting of mine will not be silenced in the regions of Achaia.
2Co 11:11 And why? Because I do not love you? God knows I do!
2Co 11:12 And what I do I will continue to do, in order to undermine the claim of those who would like to claim that in their boasted mission they work on the same terms as we do.
2Co 11:13 For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ.
2Co 11:14 And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.
2Co 11:15 So it is no surprise if his servants, also, disguise themselves as servants of righteousness. Their end will correspond to their deeds.
My guess is the reason is because he was following the Leader, who said this here:::>
Mat 10:34 "Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.
Sounds more divisive to me than ecumenical! That then, I suppose, is why the Apostle Paul is in the league of Apostles and Benedict XVI is not?
That saddens me instead of finding truth and comfort in the Psalms we are left with the ecumenicalism of hinduism.
ReplyDeleteMay the Lord continue to bless his Word as found in the Old and New Testaments.
That saddens me and shows what happens when you fall away from sola scriptura.
ReplyDeleteMay the Lord continue to bless his word in the Old and New Testaments.
You'll recall there was a big stink over his predecessor's interfaith day of prayer at Assisi. Apparently, Benedict XVI is cut out of the same piece of cloth.
ReplyDeletePlato talked of going out of the darkness and into the light, a theme which John Henry Newman had inscribed on his tombstone. I do not think that Newman was a Hindu. St Paul also denied that the promises made to the Jews were of non effect, that did not make him a Jew. God is not a clergyman, He is not confined to the Church.
ReplyDeleteVeritas:
ReplyDeletePlato and the Hindus both receive a measure of general revelation, and consequently do not always err in everything. Nevertheless, salvation is found only in the name of Christ.
Paul the Apostle was a Jew, as he not infrequently pointed out. He was not part of apostate Judaism, which rejected the Messiah, but was one of the true Israelites who was by faith a child of Abraham (as are we, if we believe the gospel that Paul preached).
God is not confined by anything, and yet salvation is by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone - and that knowledge of Christ comes by hearing the preached Word of God, to wit, the Scriptures.
-TurretinFan
The information you are provideing is very informative and we love to read this. check out Bigg Boss 13 Audition with in few days we come back again to this page and read again on Sarkari Yojana latest updateds.
ReplyDeleteNice blog, thank you so much for sharing this. Import Globals is one of the best Kenya Import Data and Ukraine Import Data service provider. Visit our website for more information.
ReplyDeleteUkraine Import Data