Well, a few minutes ago, I finished a debate with Louis Ruggiero (aka LouRugg) (link to mp3)(link to wma) The volume is a bit low, but if you turn up the volume you should be able to hear it ok. Thanks to Matthew Lankford for recording it. The following is an out-line of the first five minutes of my opening speech.
God hardens and shows mercy according to the good pleasure of his will. This clear Scriptural truth is taught explicitly in Romans 9. This truth is part of the greater truth of the Sovereignty of God. Scripture calls God the “Almighty” and declares
But our God is in the heavens: he hath done whatsoever he hath pleased. (Psalm 115:3 )
In Romans 9 the Apostle provides an argument regarding the justice and faithfulness of God. One of the points that the Apostle makes is that God shows mercy on whom he wills and hardens whom he wills. Paul supports this claim in two ways: one is a verbatim quotation from God to Moses, and the other is the example of Pharaoh.
Paul is not simply using Pharaoh in his original context, he’s applying the principle of Pharaoh to the situation of salvation. God hardens some in unbelief and shows mercy on others. There are, and this important, only two possibilities: hardening and mercy, obtaining salvation and being blinded, unbelief and faith, obedience and rebellion.
Romans 11:7 What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded.
There is no third path. There is light and darkness. Scripture says (speaking to believers):
1 Peter 2:9 But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:
And in another place:
1 Thessalonians 5:5 Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness.
And this is the result of the work of the Holy Spirit – not the original condition of us fallen men:
Ephesians 5:8-10
For ye were sometimes darkness, but now are ye light in the Lord: walk as children of light: (For the fruit of the Spirit is in all goodness and righteousness and truth;) proving what is acceptable unto the Lord.
Thus, we are “children of light” because of the regeneration of the Holy Spirit. We become children of light by being born of God who is that light.
This supernatural act of God is compared to the creation account by the Apostle Paul:
2 Corinthians 4:6 For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.
Recall the commission that Paul was given by God:
Acts 26:18 To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.
Remember that the light of the world is Jesus:
John 8:12 Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.
So there is light and darkness, no twilight zone.
What then of the who, what, and when of the hardening of Pharaoh’s heart?
Well, Pharaoh’s heart, as I said is used by Paul as an illustration. Pharaoh himself was hardened with respect to a particular command of God: “Let my people go.” God hardened Pharaoh’s heart so that Pharaoh would not let the people go.
How did God harden Pharaoh’s heart? The Scriptures don’t tell us exactly and that means we have to try to draw out the meaning from inferences in Scripture. There seem to be two main possibilities, by applying hardness to Pharaoh or withdraw softness from Pharaoh.
Now recall back to the light/darkness situation. God is the light, unbelievers are those in darkness. How is a person made dark? Is it by applying darkness too him? No, it is by removing light or better yet we could simply say not providing light. So it seems that it might be reasonable, and perhaps preferable to view the hardening of Pharaoh as the removal of God’s ordinary favor from him. He took away Pharaoh’s common sense, we might say. Or more to the point, since Pharaoh does not deserve common sense, we can simply say that God did not give Pharaoh common sense.
Thus, when Pharaoh was hardened 12 times as God had prophesied God takes the credit, though it is Pharaoh who acts wickedly in the absence of God’s giving him the gift of common sense.
This then is the whole thing in a nutshell. Pharaoh was harden because God did not make Pharaoh soft. Pharaoh was a fool because God did not make him wise. Pharaoh was in darkness because God did not give Pharaoh light.
Why? Because God wanted to destroy Pharaoh completely.
It wasn’t because Pharaoh was somehow too hard for God. No, let’s be clear, no matter how hard a man’s heart is it is not too hard for God:
Genesis 18:14 Is any thing too hard for the LORD? At the time appointed I will return unto thee, according to the time of life, and Sarah shall have a son.
Jeremiah 32:27 Behold, I am the LORD, the God of all flesh: is there any thing too hard for me?
-TurretinFan
See as well the three-part outline on hardening in the Scriptures (part 1, part 2, part 3)
Thursday, October 08, 2009
4 comments:
Comment Guidelines:
1. Thanks for posting a comment. Without you, this blog would not be interactive.
2. Please be polite. That doesn't mean you have to use kid gloves, but please try not to flame others, even if they are heretics, infidels, or worse.
3. If you insult me, I'm more likely to delete your comment than if you butter me up. After all, I'm human. I prefer praise to insults. If you prefer insults, there's something wrong with you.
4. Please be concise. The comment box is not your blog. Your blog is your blog. If you have a really long comment, post it on your blog and post a short summary of it here.
5. Please don't just spam. It's one thing to be concise, it's another thing to simply use the comment box to advertise.
6. Please note, by commenting here, you are relinquishing your (C) in your comments to me.
7. Remember that you will give an account on judgment day for your words, including those typed in comment boxes. Try to write so you will not be ashamed if it is read back before the entire world.
8. Stay on topic. If your comment has nothing to do with the post, email it to me (my email can be obtained through my blogger profile), or simply don't post it.
9. Don't post as "Anonymous." If you are going to post anonymously, at least use some kind of recognizable "handle," so we can tell you apart from all the other anonymous folks. (This is moot at the moment, since recent abuse has forced me to turn off "anonymous" commenting.)
10. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; and abstain from doing to others what you would not wish upon yourself.
I am not being charitable as this debate is nauseating.
ReplyDeleteI commend you TF for your charity!
What we have here are two foundations upon which the doctrines come forth.
LouRugg is building his arguments on the presuppositional foundation of a "human concept" and "doctrine", sand.
When you debate with a "human" conceptual end in mind and not based on God's Will, Mind, Intent and Eternal Purpose, this is what you end up with.
What seems to me, in the grand scale, that is missed by this man's conceptual intent, is the "central focus" of this creation.
It is implicit here:
Gen 1:1 In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.
Gen 1:2 The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.
Gen 1:3 And God said, "Let there be light," and there was light.
God has an explicit "Eternal Purpose" by making this implicit central focus explicit.
The Eternal Purpose is made explicit here:
Heb 1:1 Long ago, at many times and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets,
Heb 1:2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed the heir of all things, through whom also he created the world.
Heb 1:3 He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature, and he upholds the universe by the word of his power. After making purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high,
Heb 1:4 having become as much superior to angels as the name he has inherited is more excellent than theirs.
It seems this "particular characteristic" of Pharaoh is being missed, with regard to why there is the "hardening" of this Pharaoh's heart twelve times.
The "hardening" is the "means" of deliverance, or, the bringing about the Salvation of this group of Elect Chosen children of Grace, who are a simple example of the Grand Salvation to "all" of God's Elect Chosen, here:
Exo 1:8 Now there arose a new king over Egypt, who did not know Joseph.
Exo 1:9 And he said to his people, "Behold, the people of Israel are too many and too mighty for us.
Exo 1:10 Come, let us deal shrewdly with them, lest they multiply, and, if war breaks out, they join our enemies and fight against us and escape from the land."
Here is revealed, [Exo 1:8-10] ahead of the events of hardening this particular Pharaoh's heart, which needed to be hardened by a series of twelve events, predetermined already, as God knows the end of all things before the beginning of all things.
A good prosecutor is like God, he knows the answer before the question is posed by him.
just finished listening to the debate. TF, i thought you did an exceptional job at routing lou's arguments.
ReplyDeletelou's presupposition is one of human autonomy from God - that is, our "will" is outside of God's providential control. that presupposition was made quite clear, i believe, through this debate. throughout, he stressed that pharaoh could have done "this" or could have done "that," outside of anything God had all ready planned to do. in the end, i agree with you (but using different words) that it's as if God's hands were tied before the foundation of the world by what was dealt him by the "free-will decision cards" of humanity.
i'm sure lou would not state his position using such words, but that conclusion seems to be where his position regarding the autonomy of man and the sovereignty of God is leading.
Whatsoever the LORD pleased, that did he in heaven, and in earth, in the seas, and all deep places. He causeth the vapours to ascend from the ends of the earth; he maketh lightnings for the rain; he bringeth the wind out of his treasuries. Who smote the firstborn of Egypt, both of man and beast. Who sent tokens and wonders into the midst of thee, O Egypt, upon Pharaoh, and upon all his servants.
ReplyDelete(Psalms 135:6-9)
I found my download of this debate and uploaded it to mediafire:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.mediafire.com/file/cbif5b1128n5k12/2060212_01_debate_vs__lourugg_on_hardening_of_heart.mp3