Steve Ray has a list of 35 loaded Questions for "Bible Christians" (quotation marks his)(link to the whole list). This is number 10/35. I'm trying to provide the answers in a common format, for easy reference.
10) Where in the Bible do we find an inspired and infallible list of books that should belong in the Bible? (e.g., Is the Bible’s Table of Contents inspired?)
Simple Answer(s):
We don't find such a list, and the Table of Contents of our Bibles, while derived from the titles of the books of the Bible, is not itself a separately inspired document.
Important Qualification(s):
1) It is baffling why anyone thinks that it would be necessary for Christians to have an infallible list. Until the 16th century, no one claimed to have an inspired and infallible list, and the only people who claimed it then were Roman Catholics.
2) But if such a list is necessary for the Scripture, why isn't it also necessary for the rest of tradition? Why is Scripture singled out for this criticism by Roman Catholics? If the canon of Scripture is problem for "Bible Christians" the canon of Tradition is a much bigger problem for Roman Catholics.
- TurretinFan
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
3 comments:
Comment Guidelines:
1. Thanks for posting a comment. Without you, this blog would not be interactive.
2. Please be polite. That doesn't mean you have to use kid gloves, but please try not to flame others, even if they are heretics, infidels, or worse.
3. If you insult me, I'm more likely to delete your comment than if you butter me up. After all, I'm human. I prefer praise to insults. If you prefer insults, there's something wrong with you.
4. Please be concise. The comment box is not your blog. Your blog is your blog. If you have a really long comment, post it on your blog and post a short summary of it here.
5. Please don't just spam. It's one thing to be concise, it's another thing to simply use the comment box to advertise.
6. Please note, by commenting here, you are relinquishing your (C) in your comments to me.
7. Remember that you will give an account on judgment day for your words, including those typed in comment boxes. Try to write so you will not be ashamed if it is read back before the entire world.
8. Stay on topic. If your comment has nothing to do with the post, email it to me (my email can be obtained through my blogger profile), or simply don't post it.
9. Don't post as "Anonymous." If you are going to post anonymously, at least use some kind of recognizable "handle," so we can tell you apart from all the other anonymous folks. (This is moot at the moment, since recent abuse has forced me to turn off "anonymous" commenting.)
10. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; and abstain from doing to others what you would not wish upon yourself.
What we do find in scripture is an ever broadening reference to prior written words of God though, starting in Exodus and seeing Our Lord making the most comprehensive broad stroke reference to the two walking to Emasus.
ReplyDeleteoops, "Emmaus".
ReplyDeleteAnd then, of course, these words by Peter, which broadens the scope of the future for us even more:
2Pe 3:15 And count the patience of our Lord as salvation, just as our beloved brother Paul also wrote to you according to the wisdom given him,
2Pe 3:16 as he does in all his letters when he speaks in them of these matters. There are some things in them that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures.
“1) It is baffling why anyone thinks that it would be necessary for Christians to have an infallible list. Until the 16th century, no one claimed to have an inspired and infallible list, and the only people who claimed it then were Roman Catholics.”
ReplyDeleteActually the reverse is more baffling. It is baffling why anyone thinks that it would not be necessary for Christians to have an infallible list when the list is not in scripture itself.
TF- Until the 16th century, no one claimed to have an inspired and infallible list,”
But the decree at Trent only ratified local councils and tradition. Tradition is infallible just as Trent was infallible.
TF- “no one claimed to have an inspired and infallible list” shows you have a false understanding of a teaching of the church. Church teaching doesn’t need to be inspired to be infallible.
The only people who claimed an infallible list should make something tweak a little shouldn’t it. If no one else made an infallible statement about the canon then either –
The Catholics are right and we should all be Catholics
The Catholics were wrong and nobody knows what the canon is.
“2) But if such a list is necessary for the Scripture, why isn't it also necessary for the rest of tradition?”
Tradition isn’t inspired like scripture. Tradition is infallible, apostolic and binding when proclaimed by the church in its official capacity as the church teaching, or by the church, through universal practice and consent.
“ Why is Scripture singled out for this criticism by Roman Catholics?”
Scripture alone has the unique supernatural charism of being inspired. Tradition is not inspired, meaning the Holy Spirit did not author the precise wording used in church documents and the church fathers as He authored scripture. Nevertheless tradition is protected by the charism of infallibility.
“ If the canon of Scripture is problem for "Bible Christians" the canon of Tradition is a much bigger problem for Roman Catholics.”
Tradition is not found in an inspired collection of books like the scripture canon, but is found in the church fathers, church practice and the official church teaching.
JM