C. Guignebert, in an illuminating article, [FN 59] points out that for the first five centuries many converts from paganism to Christianity lived a sort of double religious life, which made them what he calls demi-Christians. Among the reasons he gives for this situation are syncretism, poor instruction in the faith, and the scandal of Christian converts who lapsed back into either partial or total paganism.From Fathers of the Church series (vol. 68), St. John Chrysostom, Discourses Against Judaizing Christians, translated by Paul W. Harkins, p. xxxiv.
[FN 59: "Les Demi-chrétiens" 65-102.]
Wednesday, October 31, 2018
Reason for Corruption?
One possible reason for corruption of the patristic church was the influence of outside religions, particularly the idol-heavy pagan religions:
5 comments:
Comment Guidelines:
1. Thanks for posting a comment. Without you, this blog would not be interactive.
2. Please be polite. That doesn't mean you have to use kid gloves, but please try not to flame others, even if they are heretics, infidels, or worse.
3. If you insult me, I'm more likely to delete your comment than if you butter me up. After all, I'm human. I prefer praise to insults. If you prefer insults, there's something wrong with you.
4. Please be concise. The comment box is not your blog. Your blog is your blog. If you have a really long comment, post it on your blog and post a short summary of it here.
5. Please don't just spam. It's one thing to be concise, it's another thing to simply use the comment box to advertise.
6. Please note, by commenting here, you are relinquishing your (C) in your comments to me.
7. Remember that you will give an account on judgment day for your words, including those typed in comment boxes. Try to write so you will not be ashamed if it is read back before the entire world.
8. Stay on topic. If your comment has nothing to do with the post, email it to me (my email can be obtained through my blogger profile), or simply don't post it.
9. Don't post as "Anonymous." If you are going to post anonymously, at least use some kind of recognizable "handle," so we can tell you apart from all the other anonymous folks. (This is moot at the moment, since recent abuse has forced me to turn off "anonymous" commenting.)
10. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; and abstain from doing to others what you would not wish upon yourself.
I found your weblog website on google and verify a few of your early posts. Continue to keep up the superb operate. I just further up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Looking for forward to reading more from you later on!… online casinos
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteTurretinfan-
ReplyDeleteI crave your analysis-
I would state that although we can say the Church prior to the reformation failed in several respects, yet she did not fail utterly, and even faithfully was sustained by Christ’s promise “The gates of Hell will not prevail” in this sense- that she kept within her bosom the sacred scriptures and preserved them down through the ages, so that, though men would deface the face of the virgin Ekklesia, they could not violate her so long as she clung to and preserved the rule of faith.
I would say it’s similar to how modern traditional Catholics say of the liberals “They don’t represent the true teaching of the Church, because they don’t take seriously past Church teaching” the Reformed ought to say, “These later innovations do not belong to the Church, because they do not represent the faith proclaimed in the infallible rule of faith, the holy scriptures!”
Yet after the excess is cleared away, and the Worldly institution of the Vatican clearly distinguished from the Church, it is then when the prophetess Jezebel, tolerated until now in the midst of the Church, is revealed as the whore. But the Vatican is not and has never been the Virgin Ekklesia.
What say you?
After study a few of the blog posts in your website now, and I actually like your approach of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark web site checklist and will probably be checking back soon. Pls take a look at my web page as effectively and let me know what you think. casino bonus
ReplyDeleteOne could, of course, also argue (in a similar vein to that of Matthew 19:8 or Mark 10:5) that it is due to the influence of Egyptian idolatry that Moses (whose father in law, Jethro, was a pagan priest), commanded (or allowed) the Israelites to decorate both the ark of the covenant (Exodus 25) and the curtain of the tabernacle (Exodus 26) with golden cherubs.
ReplyDeleteSimilarly for Solomon, who erected enormous statues of cherubs in the Jerusalem temple (1 Kings 6; 2 Chronicles 3), and was also known to have sacrificed to idols later in life, due to the influence of his many polytheistic wives and mistresses (1 Kings 11).
However, as it stands, the argument is somewhat one-sided, cherry-picked, and at least partially anti-biblical.