In the processing of reviewing a dialogue between non-Calvinist evangelical Ergun Caner and atheist/agnostic "Rational Response Squad," I stumbled across an interesting transcendental argument.
The Rational Response Squad asked for the three best reasons to believe in God.
Ergun Caner's very first response, interestingly, was to appeal to the universal practice of worship, stating that even those who did not believe in God at all "still held to a view of transcendants - you've got to believe in something greater than yourself, other than yourself." He stated this "universal yearning" is his "first apologetic."
It's certainly not mine, but I wonder how it strikes VanTillians?
-Turretinfan
Saturday, June 16, 2007
3 comments:
Comment Guidelines:
1. Thanks for posting a comment. Without you, this blog would not be interactive.
2. Please be polite. That doesn't mean you have to use kid gloves, but please try not to flame others, even if they are heretics, infidels, or worse.
3. If you insult me, I'm more likely to delete your comment than if you butter me up. After all, I'm human. I prefer praise to insults. If you prefer insults, there's something wrong with you.
4. Please be concise. The comment box is not your blog. Your blog is your blog. If you have a really long comment, post it on your blog and post a short summary of it here.
5. Please don't just spam. It's one thing to be concise, it's another thing to simply use the comment box to advertise.
6. Please note, by commenting here, you are relinquishing your (C) in your comments to me.
7. Remember that you will give an account on judgment day for your words, including those typed in comment boxes. Try to write so you will not be ashamed if it is read back before the entire world.
8. Stay on topic. If your comment has nothing to do with the post, email it to me (my email can be obtained through my blogger profile), or simply don't post it.
9. Don't post as "Anonymous." If you are going to post anonymously, at least use some kind of recognizable "handle," so we can tell you apart from all the other anonymous folks. (This is moot at the moment, since recent abuse has forced me to turn off "anonymous" commenting.)
10. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; and abstain from doing to others what you would not wish upon yourself.
This isn't a transcendental argument and it doesn't sound like Caner is using the term correctly when he states, "still held to a view of transcendants - you've got to believe in something greater than yourself, other than yourself" (unless I am misunderstanding his context). Believing in something greater than yourself may be beleiving in something that *transcends* yourself but this is not properlly speaking a transcendental (some precondition to 'x').
ReplyDeleteJB
I should note that in a sense this can be *part* of a transcendental argument if he is appealing to the fact all men have x (desire to worship)and y is the precondition to x. However, the argument in this form is very poor and it seems more likely that Caner is arguing that all men have a desire to worship something which transcends them, so, prima facie, there may be some god being which transcends men.
ReplyDeleteJB
Dear JB,
ReplyDeleteSorry for my delay in responding.
Note that, properly speaking, the argument was a "transcendental" argument, because it relied on transcendents.
As you correctly note, it does not rely on "transcendentals" meaning preconditions. I'm not too strongly in favor of that nomenclature, though. I'd prefer just to call them preconditions, since they don't have anything to do with the concept of transcendence.
-Turretinfan