This sea slug is (according to journalists, a huge qualification) part animal and part plant (link). Thus, the slug defies conventional clades. It does not fit into the evolutionary tree. Will any atheists accept this evidence and discard evolution? Probably not. Most will simply try to build a new tree and assume that one can be built until they succeed.
Incidentally, I suspect that this sea slug will turn out to have a parasitic plant living symbiotically with it, or something like that. If so, it will fall more or less neatly into the existing clades.
The explanation in the article is that by an unexplained mechanism (it sounds so much nicer than "magically") the slugs steal genes from their food and pass those genes on to their offspring. If this is correct, then the slugs fit in the slug clade and simply have a very unusual distinctive trait of being able to steal genetic code from other organisms.
Of course, by the way, the ability to steal genetic code from other organisms is a great deus ex machina to avoid letting the clading system be falsified by the evidence of nature (much like the deus ex machina of parallel evolution).
-TurretinFan
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
11 comments:
Comment Guidelines:
1. Thanks for posting a comment. Without you, this blog would not be interactive.
2. Please be polite. That doesn't mean you have to use kid gloves, but please try not to flame others, even if they are heretics, infidels, or worse.
3. If you insult me, I'm more likely to delete your comment than if you butter me up. After all, I'm human. I prefer praise to insults. If you prefer insults, there's something wrong with you.
4. Please be concise. The comment box is not your blog. Your blog is your blog. If you have a really long comment, post it on your blog and post a short summary of it here.
5. Please don't just spam. It's one thing to be concise, it's another thing to simply use the comment box to advertise.
6. Please note, by commenting here, you are relinquishing your (C) in your comments to me.
7. Remember that you will give an account on judgment day for your words, including those typed in comment boxes. Try to write so you will not be ashamed if it is read back before the entire world.
8. Stay on topic. If your comment has nothing to do with the post, email it to me (my email can be obtained through my blogger profile), or simply don't post it.
9. Don't post as "Anonymous." If you are going to post anonymously, at least use some kind of recognizable "handle," so we can tell you apart from all the other anonymous folks. (This is moot at the moment, since recent abuse has forced me to turn off "anonymous" commenting.)
10. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; and abstain from doing to others what you would not wish upon yourself.
That is one badass slug! Awesomeness. I soooo want one for my aquarium now.
ReplyDeleteLOL
Wouldn't they claim it as a transitional form between plants and animals and claim animals evolved from plants?
ReplyDeleteThis is actually very cool, and the implications are quite simply staggering.
ReplyDeleteJust think...what if a sea slug were to ingest Richard Dawkins, proceed to "steal" his genes, and pass them on to the next generation?
Methinks it would represent a major evolutionary leap forward for atheism. At a minimum it could serve to introduce them to the concept of regeneration - albeit not the theological type.
Phylum Mollusca,
My father consumed Dawkins;
Homo Atheist
In Christ,
CD
I have heard good creationist arguments about the "bombardier beetle" as well. Do you know of any evolutionist refutations of those arguments? What do they say about the "duck-billed platypus"?
ReplyDeleteI also want to inform you of a typo... "Most will simply try to build a new tree and assume that one can built until they succeed."
I think you meant to type "build" instead of "built". [please delete this comment upon correction]
Mr. Miller: Just don't let it bite you or it may steal your DNA too! :)
ReplyDeleteAnonymous: That would be one way of reorganizing the tree. However, the necessary revisions would be enormous.
CD: While a sea slug with an English accent would be interesting, the last thing we need are more arrogant sea slugs! :)
Timothy: Thanks for the correction. I've updated the sentence. Evolutionists do provide responses to the arguments. Usually those responses (with respect to the beetle) rely on speculation that the many parts needed to obtain the current were each naturally selected for some other reason. With respect to the platypus there does appear to be the use of the parallel evolution argument with respect to certain features.
Someone named Reggie on the unofficial facebook fan page (which I don't run) provided some interesting additional links:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20026795.700-jumping-gene-leapt-into-ancient-mammals-dna.html
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118491009/abstract
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/120125549/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
The upshot of those links is that indeed, a similar deus ex machina has been proposed to explain away problems in the clading tree.
The "jumping gene leapt into ancient mammals" article provides an amusing hypothesis along those lines.
Timothy,
ReplyDeleteTake a look at http://www.talkorigins.org for evolutionary responses.
And then you can take a look at
http://creationwiki.org/Category:Anticreation_response
for responses to that, so anyone can judge.
Yet for all the big talk, TalkOrigins has made me laugh out loud a few times with how silly it is.
Did you hear the one about the slug and the snail?
ReplyDeleteIf I have, I don't recall it.
ReplyDeleteWell the slug was invited over to dinner at the Snail's house.
ReplyDeleteWhen he got there, besides the food being cold, he saw that the snail's two eyes were bent backwards and asked why?
Oh, my mom bought me a turtle to ride on and I was just out riding him while I was waiting for you to show up for dinner! :)
escargot anyone?
very nice
ReplyDelete"more arrogant sea slugs"
ReplyDeleteBwah ha ha ha ha!!!