To John H. Armstrong, author of the book, "Your Church is Too Small," and to those who buy into his way of thinking, my response is "Your hell is too small."
What do I mean by that? I mean that you are too quick to assume that people don't need to hear the gospel. You figure, "if they call themselves Christians, who am I to judge?" But in the process you lose the chance to convict them of sin and exhort them to repentance and faith in Christ.
By accepting their Christian professions despite their idolatry or other serious and unrepented-of sin, you are not doing them any favors. You may make a lot of friends for yourself (and that will be your reward) but you are not showing them love.
We love our fellow humans and we don't long for hell to be as large as it is. But on the other hand, we need to be realistic and to keep in mind that there will be many who are now saying "Lord, Lord," who will be there. It's not loving to tell someone with a treatable disease that they are fine, even if they don't want to hear about their disease.
Mr. Armstrong, you may think that my definition of the church is too small, but I'm afraid I must tell you that your definition of hell is too small. If I'm wrong, I've shared the gospel in vain. If you're wrong, you've failed to share the gospel with those who need it. If there's any uncertainty about who is right, I suggest you come over to my side.
-TurretinFan
Friday, March 04, 2011
10 comments:
Comment Guidelines:
1. Thanks for posting a comment. Without you, this blog would not be interactive.
2. Please be polite. That doesn't mean you have to use kid gloves, but please try not to flame others, even if they are heretics, infidels, or worse.
3. If you insult me, I'm more likely to delete your comment than if you butter me up. After all, I'm human. I prefer praise to insults. If you prefer insults, there's something wrong with you.
4. Please be concise. The comment box is not your blog. Your blog is your blog. If you have a really long comment, post it on your blog and post a short summary of it here.
5. Please don't just spam. It's one thing to be concise, it's another thing to simply use the comment box to advertise.
6. Please note, by commenting here, you are relinquishing your (C) in your comments to me.
7. Remember that you will give an account on judgment day for your words, including those typed in comment boxes. Try to write so you will not be ashamed if it is read back before the entire world.
8. Stay on topic. If your comment has nothing to do with the post, email it to me (my email can be obtained through my blogger profile), or simply don't post it.
9. Don't post as "Anonymous." If you are going to post anonymously, at least use some kind of recognizable "handle," so we can tell you apart from all the other anonymous folks. (This is moot at the moment, since recent abuse has forced me to turn off "anonymous" commenting.)
10. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; and abstain from doing to others what you would not wish upon yourself.
"It's not loving to tell someone with a treatable disease that they are fine, even if they don't want to hear about their disease."
ReplyDeleteLet's run with this a little more. (Which by the way is quite a good parallel.)
The person with the disease oftentimes becomes angry with you and calls you names like "unloving", "judgmental", "pharasaic, "ungodly", etc.... They plainly reject your diagnosis and treatment. When you say it's not your diagnosis and treatment, but rather that it's from God, they still think it's your harsh, unloving subjective opinion.
After this response from the diseased person, you oftentimes run into condemnation from *both* his unbelieving friends/family *and* other Christians who will reflexively think that because the diseased person is offended by you, then it must be you who was unnecessarily offensive and mean, no matter how kind and soft you tried to present the Gospel, and not the Gospel of Jesus who was offensive to the diseased person.
Basically, the Great Commission evangelist is condemned and shunned quite broadly in his attempts to love his neighbor with the Gospel.
Whaddya gonna do?
"Whaddya gonna do?"
ReplyDeleteKeep on building the ark, like Noah did: whether 8 will board it or 8 billion.
"But in the process you lose the chance to convict them of sin and exhort them to repentance and faith in Christ".
ReplyDeleteYou end up confusing yourself and everyone else, Mr. Turrentinfan. Does salvation finally depend on exhortation and repentance and not on what God has pre-ordained?
Salvation is of the Lord, Dozie, and yet if you will repent and trust in Him, He will save you.
ReplyDeleteIs this the same man who was once one of the heroes of Reformed theology in the 90's?
ReplyDeleteYou mean Armstrong? If so, I think he is the same one you are thinking about.
ReplyDelete-TurretinFan
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteand now with my proper account... ;-)
ReplyDeletespot on. I reviewed this book a while ago and was pretty depressed with the whole thing. Armstrong simply failed to properly address Jesus' own stated basis of unity - the word of truth.
You seem to be able to misread and misunderstand john armstrong...this is not at all what he was in mind. I suggest you refamiliarize yourself with his work.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comments, Mr. Lay.
ReplyDelete