(Not sure if this comment will eventually be released from "moderation" there -- at least one subsequent comment has published since the comment was submitted -- but I figured I can post it here, and if Mr. Stewart wants to reply here, he's welcome.)
Mr. Stewart,
Having posted a longer reply to your post here:
http://turretinfan.blogspot.com/2012/02/did-acts-15-council-rely-on-exegesis-of.html
Let me briefly address two of your points:
1) Amos 9:11-12 does answer the question of whether circumcision is
necessary, because it refers to Gentiles who are called by the name of
the Lord. That may not be perspicuous to you, but it is the reason that
James quoted it.
2) In fact, the assembly did take a stand on the Scriptures
(especially Amos 9:11-12) against the traditions of men (namely the
traditions of the Judaizers – the men who came from James, but whose
tradition was inauthentic). This demonstrates the weakness of oral
tradition. If there was already phoney oral tradition in the mid-first
century, how much more opportunity there was for such phoney oral
tradition later on. A wise God could address this problem by providing
for the Scriptures to be written (well – completed – the bulk of the
Scriptures were already written) and widely disseminated rapidly.
In fact, God did use this approach. The Scriptures are able to
throughly furnish the man of God unto every good work. That’s why were
able to reject claims that the papacy was a divine institution even
before RC historians (such as Robert Eno and Francis Sullivan) and
non-RC historians (like Peter Lampe) demonstrated historically that the
papacy was a development.
Tradition of man or Scriptural teaching? Those are the options you
have today, since you cannot summon a council of the apostles to ask
them whether they transmitted an oral tradition of the bodily assumption
of Mary, of her immaculate conception, of her perpetual virginity, of
transubstantitation, of purgatory, of prayers to Mary, or prayers to the
saints, of worshiping of God by images, and so on and so forth — and if
you make an historical inquiry, you will find it clear that at least
some of those things do not extend back to the apostles.
So, will you hear Scripture and tradition? Or will you reject history and tradition in favor of the teachings of Vatican I?
-TurretinFan
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Guidelines:
1. Thanks for posting a comment. Without you, this blog would not be interactive.
2. Please be polite. That doesn't mean you have to use kid gloves, but please try not to flame others, even if they are heretics, infidels, or worse.
3. If you insult me, I'm more likely to delete your comment than if you butter me up. After all, I'm human. I prefer praise to insults. If you prefer insults, there's something wrong with you.
4. Please be concise. The comment box is not your blog. Your blog is your blog. If you have a really long comment, post it on your blog and post a short summary of it here.
5. Please don't just spam. It's one thing to be concise, it's another thing to simply use the comment box to advertise.
6. Please note, by commenting here, you are relinquishing your (C) in your comments to me.
7. Remember that you will give an account on judgment day for your words, including those typed in comment boxes. Try to write so you will not be ashamed if it is read back before the entire world.
8. Stay on topic. If your comment has nothing to do with the post, email it to me (my email can be obtained through my blogger profile), or simply don't post it.
9. Don't post as "Anonymous." If you are going to post anonymously, at least use some kind of recognizable "handle," so we can tell you apart from all the other anonymous folks. (This is moot at the moment, since recent abuse has forced me to turn off "anonymous" commenting.)
10. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; and abstain from doing to others what you would not wish upon yourself.