Friday, November 17, 2023
Piscator's Comments at Revelation 16:5
›
Piscator's comments on Revelation 16:5 are of interest to our discussion of Beza's view of the text. ( pp. 821-22 of the 1658 editi...
Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Beza's Sources as it relates to Revelation 16:5
›
Jan Krans devoted two appendices of Beyond What is Written to the identification of the Greek manuscripts and editions used by Erasmus (App...
Saturday, November 11, 2023
"Futurus" and "To come"
›
Can the Latin word "futurus" sometimes be a translation of "to come"? Interestingly, the answer is that it depends on t...
Friday, November 10, 2023
Beza, Plato, and the "Shall Be" Speculative Restoration at Revelation 16:5
›
Beza speculatively replaced "ὅσιος" with "ἐσόμενος" in Revelation 16:5. Sometimes advocates of the King James Version (...
Euthymius Protasecretis against Images
›
I came across this beautiful text from a Greek-speaking author with whom I'm not familiar. It is interesting for a variety of reasons, ...
1 comment:
James Arminius on the Canon of Scripture
›
Those who know me, know I don't endorse anything on the grounds that Arminius said it. However, since Arminius has recently been accuse...
1 comment:
‹
›
Home
View web version
