Thursday, April 29, 2010
A Note of Thanks to John Martin
2 comments:
Comment Guidelines:
1. Thanks for posting a comment. Without you, this blog would not be interactive.
2. Please be polite. That doesn't mean you have to use kid gloves, but please try not to flame others, even if they are heretics, infidels, or worse.
3. If you insult me, I'm more likely to delete your comment than if you butter me up. After all, I'm human. I prefer praise to insults. If you prefer insults, there's something wrong with you.
4. Please be concise. The comment box is not your blog. Your blog is your blog. If you have a really long comment, post it on your blog and post a short summary of it here.
5. Please don't just spam. It's one thing to be concise, it's another thing to simply use the comment box to advertise.
6. Please note, by commenting here, you are relinquishing your (C) in your comments to me.
7. Remember that you will give an account on judgment day for your words, including those typed in comment boxes. Try to write so you will not be ashamed if it is read back before the entire world.
8. Stay on topic. If your comment has nothing to do with the post, email it to me (my email can be obtained through my blogger profile), or simply don't post it.
9. Don't post as "Anonymous." If you are going to post anonymously, at least use some kind of recognizable "handle," so we can tell you apart from all the other anonymous folks. (This is moot at the moment, since recent abuse has forced me to turn off "anonymous" commenting.)
10. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; and abstain from doing to others what you would not wish upon yourself.
I'd like to voice my appreciation too. Though the rhetoric from Mr. Martin is a bit harsh at times, which I suppose I could chalk up to Mr. Martin being a blunt guy, it is appreciated that he's taking the time to actually deal with all of the arguments that TF has provided.
ReplyDeleteIt's undoubtedly a rather interesting discussion. It's also very striking in that Mr. Martin is, in a sense, demonstrating the inconsistency of holding to penal substitution while believing that the atonement was universal. Reformed folks have been trying to point that out to those who argue for a universal atonement for a while now...
Catholic theology is a subtle thing, like scripture, we need to make distinctions to account for all the information we have been given by God.
ReplyDeleteThe atonement was objectively universal, whereby Christ merited grace for all men, however the redemption is not subjectively universal, for scripture tells us some men will reject the grace given them in this life and will be punished for it in the next.
Regarding the atonement, the church teaches it is objectively universal, but subjectively finite due to men’s free choice to reject his grace.
As usual, it is a mystery we cannot fully understand in this life. But that’s what Christians know as the divine revelation that requires faith to believe and accept, even though we don’t see the causes of these truths.
I'd also like to thank FT foe his answers. Evidently I disagree with his rebuttals on penal substitution, but I thank him for his integrity in expressing his views openly and allowing my comments to stand in public view. He is to be commended for that.
JM