Thursday, August 31, 2023

Autpurt Ambrose (d. 784) on the Ark of Revelation 11:19 and the Woman of Revelation 12:1 and On the Bodily Assumption

Ambrosius Autpertus, in Corpus Christianorum, Continuatio Mediavalis (CCCM) vol. XXVII (Ambrosius Autpertus, part 1), Expositions in Apocalypse, Books I-V

From the preface:

Again, John tells of having seen a woman clothed with the sun in the sky, and there she gave birth. But the dragon stood before her, to devour her child; however, the child was snatched to God and to his throne. After this, the woman fled into the wilderness, and immediately there was a great battle in heaven; and the dragon was thrown down from heaven to earth and pursued the woman. For what could be found more mad or more foolish than to say that in that heavenly dwelling there are childbirths of women? Moreover, if the dragon was thrown from heaven to earth, how did he pursue the woman, who is not said to have fallen from heaven to earth? If, I say, the dragon was thrown to the earth, what necessity drove the woman to flee from heaven into the wilderness? Or perhaps when the devil fell from that heavenly dwelling, was the woman, still bearing a child in heaven, already crying out, though she had not yet been established on earth? Or truly, was the son of the woman certainly born in heaven and not thrown from heaven, to escape the dragon's bite, taken from somewhere else in heaven to find God and his throne? Thus, in all things such confrontations confuse the literal surface: to the extent that they teach us to avoid the exterior letter in figurative expressions, and to follow the inner spirit in understanding the mysteries. Rursum idem Iohannes narrat mulierem se amictam sole in caelo uidisse, ibique peperisse. Draconem autem ante eam, ut filium eius deuoraret, stetisse ; sed ad Deum et ad thronum eius, eundem filium raptum fuisse. Mulierem uero post haec in solitudinem fugisse, statimque proelium magnum in caelo factum fuisse ; et draconem de caelo in terram proiectum, mulierem insectasse. Quid enim dementius, quid stultius repperiri potest, quam ut in superna illa caelestique habitatione, partus mulierum esse dicantur ? Sed et si draco deiectus est de caelo in terram, quomodo persecutus est mulierem, quae non dicitur de caelo ruisse in terram ? Si, inquam, draco proiectus est in terram, quae necessitas conpulit mulierem de caelo in solitudinem fugere ? An forte quando diabolus de illa superna habitatione ruit, iam mulier in caelo parturiens clamabat, quae necdum in terra condita fuerat ? An uero filius mulieris in caelo utique natus, nec de caelo deiectus, ut morsum draconis euaderet, alibi de caelo fuit raptus, quo Deum et thronum eius inueniret ? Sic itaque in omnibus superficiem litterae confundunt tales obluctationes : quatenus cauere nos doceant in figuratis locutionibus litteram exterius, et ad mystica intellegenda spiritum interius sequi.

For Ambrose Autpurt, taking Revelation 12 literally is an example of obvious folly. 

Book V, at Revelation 11:19a to 12:2

AND THE TEMPLE OF GOD WAS OPENED IN HEAVEN, AND THE ARK OF HIS COVENANT WAS SEEN IN HIS TEMPLE.

This expression returns to the beginning of faith, and intertwined with the corporeal birth of the Redeemer, the actions of His body which is the Church, and the conflicts it undergoes against the ancient enemy, it interweaves with other diverse figures. For what else in this place do we understand by the temple of God, if not the Lord Jesus Christ? The temple is rightly seen as opened and not closed, because indeed the Son of God was manifestly born in the flesh, truly suffered in the flesh, wonderfully raised in the flesh, and powerfully said to be lifted in the flesh to the heavens. Although all the saints are truly called the temple of God, that body which was assumed for human salvation is uniquely and chiefly called the temple of God, in which the fullness of divinity dwells bodily. About this very temple, the same [Jesus] spoke to the Jews, saying: 'Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.' Which temple he meant, the Evangelist subsequently explained, saying: 'He spoke of the temple of His body.' However, this temple is opened in heaven because our Redeemer is proclaimed and retained to have accomplished the dispensation of human salvation in the Church.

Where it is properly added: 'And the ark of his covenant was seen in his temple.' It is designated by the ark of the covenant, which is seen in the temple, and by the sky in which the temple opens, that is, the Church of the elect. It is called the ark of the covenant because the power of the two Testaments is inscribed in it by the finger of God, that is, by the Holy Spirit, no longer on stone tablets, but on the fleshy tablets of the heart. According to the account in Exodus, it is also said to have four golden rings, in which it is carried by four poles, because it is armed with the four Gospels, by which it is guided by holy preachers; in it is also said to be a golden urn containing manna, that is, the wisdom of the divine Word, providing sustenance for life, as well as Aaron's rod that budded, that is, the validation of the royal priesthood, to whose members the Apostle Peter says: 'You are a royal race, a royal priesthood.'

With the temple therefore opened, the ark of the covenant appears, because, once the dispensation of our salvation is completed, the Church is gathered in Christ. Moreover, the opened temple can be understood as that by which we read that our Mediator [Christ] was pierced on the cross with a lance, and 'the ark of the covenant was seen in his temple,' by which we understand the sacraments of blood and water, by which the Church is built. Just as the woman [Eve] was formed from the side of the sleeping Adam, so from the side of Christ hanging on the cross was the Church fashioned. Hence, not without reason, when his side was opened by the lance and blood and water came out, John is known to have said: 'And he who saw it has borne witness.' As if he was saying in other words: 'He who saw the ark of God in the opened temple, because what he saw was true, bore witness.' But to say 'in heaven', he meant to be understood as 'in his sight'. For he was among those of whom it had been written: 'The heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament proclaims the work of his hands.' What follows is:

AND THERE WERE LIGHTNINGS, AND VOICES, AND THUNDERS, AND AN EARTHQUAKE, AND GREAT HAIL.

What are meant by lightnings if not, as we have often said, the signs of miracles? For lightning indeed strikes terror, and by its sudden flash weakens human strength. This aligns well with miracles, by which the minds of the unbelievers, struck down and soon breaking the force of their pride, submitted to humility. Hence, it is said to the Lord by the Psalmist: "You will multiply lightnings and confuse them." He multiplied the lightnings, indeed, because He displayed countless signs of miracles through the Apostles and apostolic men around the world. And He confused them, meaning, He brought down His resisting adversaries from their strength. Hence, another Psalm says: "Your lightning illuminated the world, the earth saw and was moved." But what else is meant by voices if not the preachings of the Church? Hence, rightly, it is remembered that seven thunders spoke their voices. It is fitting that lightnings occur first and then voices follow, because the holy preachers, in order to lead the hearts of the unbelievers to new beliefs through speech, first showed new miracles. Hence, Peter, in order to shape the minds of the Jews to faith through words, first healed the paralytic at the temple gate. Hence, Paul, to convert the people of Malta through preaching, healed the father of Publius from dysentery. After the voices, thunders occur, so that those who perhaps despise miracles and scorn words may be shaken by the terror of judgment. After the thunders, there are earthquakes, meaning the great persecution of the pagans. Rightly also those who stir up persecution are symbolized by hail. For hail, although it shatters crops on the ground, also shatters itself in the process, so that the hail disappears entirely and the earth bears fruit again. Thus, the raging crowd of gentiles, while trying to completely erase the name of Christ from the earth, was reduced to nothing, either in strength or certainly by a change for the better. Many of those who persecuted the Church of God returned to the faith of the Mediator, and began to suffer what they had previously inflicted on others. What follows is:

AND A GREAT SIGN APPEARED IN HEAVEN: A WOMAN CLOTHED WITH THE SUN, AND THE MOON UNDER HER FEET

In order to seek this sign, we know Achaz was admonished by the Lord, saying: "Ask for a sign from your Lord God in the depth of hell or in the height above." When that faithless king responded, "I will not ask, and I will not test the Lord," the word was immediately directed to the house of David, saying, "Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, a virgin will conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel." This sign is certainly seen in heaven, that is, in the Church of the saints, even now. Let's speak more plainly about this sign. It is then added: "A woman clothed with the sun." As if it were said: the blessed and ever-virgin Mary, overshadowed by the power of the Most High, to whom, as we know, the Angel said: "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you" – that very power, about which Paul says: "Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God." And because often the general is found in the specific, the blessed and devout Virgin here represents the Church, which gives birth daily to new peoples from whom the general body of the Mediator is formed. It is not surprising if she prefigures the Church, in whose blessed womb the Church was worthy to be united with its head. For in the following reading, some things are recounted that cannot specifically fit the Blessed Virgin according to the literal sense, but generally fit the Church of the elect according to the mystical narration. Therefore, we should follow the general in the specific throughout, and understand that everything we see as fitting to one is said of all. Therefore, the woman is said to be clothed with the sun, which is very fitting for the souls of the faithful. Are they not clothed with the robe of the sun, to whom it is said through Paul: "For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ"? For Christ is the sun of righteousness and the brightness of eternal light. Of this sun, the wicked will certainly say in hell: "The sun did not rise for us." In contrast, the elect hear: "For you who fear the Lord, the sun of righteousness will rise.

But what is signified in this place by the moon, if not the changeability of temporal things? For just as the moon wanes with the progression of time, it rightly signifies the decline of mutability through it. Therefore, whoever despises all fleeting corporeal things, as if he suppresses the moon under his feet. However, by the moon, which is under the feet of the woman, heretics might be designated. Not because, during their manifestation, the Church has always been superior to them in worldly power, especially when it has often been oppressed by them, but because they, obscured and diminished by the truth of light in which the whole body is clothed, so deservedly fell from the state of the same body by the merit of their rejection, that they were deemed unworthy even to pertain to its utmost members, which are symbolized by the feet. Instead, they delight in those things and with full mental effort dwell in those matters which the saints wholeheartedly seek to crush, that is, false teachings and the vain honors of this world. They are thus under the feet of the elect because they seek lowly things and yearn for earthly ones. But it's no surprise if from where some find stability's progress, others incur the decline of changeability, and where some shine like the sun, others wane like the moon. For Simeon says to the Lord: "Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising of many in Israel." Solomon aptly indicates their changeability and decline, saying, "A fool changes like the moon." For what is more foolish and more contradictory to oneself than what heretics believe about Christ? Valentinus thinks differently about Him than does Bardesanes, differently than Apollinaris, differently than Arius, differently than Sabellius, differently than Photinus, and seldom are found those who seem to agree in their opinions. And what do we understand in these but foolishness, what but the waning of the moon and changeability? The integrity of Christ is certainly persecuted by these, who, enduring the decline of changeability and faith, seem to lie at the very feet. What we have understood about heretics can also be applied to false Christians, who yearn for earthly desires and torment the life of the elect with corrupt morals. Those who seem to manage the cares of ecclesiastical matters in such a way that spiritual men need not deal with external things can also aptly be expressed by the term "moon", resulting in the Church not touching the earth in spiritual men. What follows is:

AND ON HER HEAD, A CROWN OF TWELVE STARS

As we have often said, and all true faith commentators have mentioned, the Lord and the Church are one entity, the head and the body are one whole. Therefore, the Church is crowned in its head, that is, in Christ Jesus, of whom Paul says: "He is the head of all Churches." But by the twelve stars with which the king's crown is adorned, what else should we understand but the Apostles, who were the first to cling to our head, and who were the first to become an adornment of that head? And rightly they are designated by stars because they have been proven to illuminate the darkness of ignorance with the rays of truth. Hence the Angel generally speaks about all true faith preachers to Daniel, saying: "Those who are wise will shine like the stars of the heavens: and those who turn many to righteousness, like the stars for everlasting eternities." Hence Paul says: "Among a crooked and perverse nation, among whom you shine as lights in the world, holding forth the word of life." Although all preachers of faith can be seen as a kind in the species in the number of Apostles, they specifically and primarily became the crown of the head because the head first achieved victory over the whole world through them. It follows:

AND IN HER WOMB SHE CRIES, LABORING IN PAIN, AND ANGUISHED TO GIVE BIRTH

These words cannot be applied to the Blessed Virgin Mary in the literal sense, for she could not have pain in childbirth, who contracted no sin of lust in conception. But in a mystical sense, it undoubtedly refers to the Church, of which the Blessed Virgin is known to be the most excellent member. The Church of the elect is called a woman, not because she is weak in faith or action, but because she gives birth daily to the body of her Redeemer in the believing people. For unless the Church gave birth to Christ, her Son would not say to her: "Whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother, and sister, and mother." Nor would the Psalmist say: "Of Zion it will be said, 'This one and that one were born in her, and the Most High himself will establish her.'" Does not Paul generate Christ in believers when he said: "For even if you had ten thousand guardians in Christ, you do not have many fathers, for in Christ Jesus I became your father through the gospel?" But as long as the Church gives birth, she cries in labor, and is tormented to give birth, because unless the time comes when she perfectly gives birth to her son, when nothing of the body remains, she suffers some difficulty of childbirth here, especially when she gives birth again to some whom she had already delivered. To such, Paul said, lamenting like a mother in labor: "My dear children, for whom I am again in the pains of childbirth until Christ is formed in you." Until then, as the same Apostle says, "we all reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of God and become mature, attaining to the whole measure of the fullness of Christ." The Mother Church, laboring, cries out and is tormented to give birth, but when the time or hour comes when the last members of the body proceed to the light of faith by being born, then the torment and cry of childbirth will cease, then the sigh of hardships will be forgotten, and the indescribable joy of future goods will follow. Hence, the Lord in the Gospel says: "A woman giving birth to a child has pain because her time has come; but when her baby is born she forgets the anguish because of her joy that a child is born into the world." But what he meant, he himself explained, saying: "So with you: Now is your time of grief, but I will see you again and you will rejoice, and no one will take away your joy." What follows is:

ET APERTUM EST TEMPLUM DEI IN CAELO, ET VISA EST ARCA TESTAMENTI EIUS IN TEMPLO EIUS

Haec locutio ad initium fidei recurrit, et recapitulata Redemptoris corporea natiuitate, actus corporis eius quod est Ecclesia, conflictusque quos aduersus antiquum hostem agit, aliis diuersisque figuris intexit. Quid enim hoc loco aliud per Dei templum, nisi Dominum intellegimus Iesum Christum ? Bene apertum, et non clausum, cernitur templum, quia uidelicet Dei Filius manifeste in carne natus, ueraciter in carne passus, mirabiliter in carne suscitatus, potenter in carne ad caelos eleuatus perhibetur. Quamquam enim omnes sancti templum Dei ueraciter appellentur, illud tamen corpus pro humana salute susceptum, singulariter ac principaliter templum Dei uocatur, in quo omnis plenitudo diuinitatis inhabitat corporaliter. De quo nimirum templo idem ad Iudaeos loquitur, dicens : Soluite templum hoc, et in tribus diebus excitabo illud. Quod uero esset templum de quo diceret, Euangelista subsecutus exposuit, dicens : Hoc autem dicebat de templo corporis sui. In caelo autem hoc templum aperitur, quia uidelicet Redemptor noster dispensationem humanae salutis peregisse in Ecclesia praedicatur ac retinetur.

Vbi adhuc recte subiungitur : Et uisa est arca testamenti eius in templo eius. Ipsa designatur per arcam testamenti, quae uidetur in templo, ipsa et per caelum in quo aperitur templum, id est, electorum Ecclesia. Quae propterea arca testamenti uocatur, quia duorum in ea Testamentorum uirtus digito Dei, hoc est. Spiritu Sancto inscribitur, non iam in tabulis lapideis, sed in tabulis cordis carnalibus. Quae etiam iuxta fidem Exodi quattuor circulos aureos habere perhibetur, in quibus quattuor uectibus portetur, quia uidelicet quattuor Euangeliis armatur, per quae a sanctis praedicatoribus gubernatur ; in qua urna quoque aurea, manna continens, inesse dicitur, id est, diuini Verbi sapientia, pabulum continens uitae, necnon et uirga Aaron quae fronduerat, hoc est, ad probatio regalis sacerdotii, ad cuius membra Petrus Apostolus dicit : Vos genus regium, regale sacerdotium.

Aperto itaque templo, arca testamenti apparet, quia peracta nostrae salutis dispensatione, in Christo adgregatur Ecclesia. Potest autem in eo templum intellegi apertum, quo Mediatorem nostrum legimus in cruce lancea perforatum, et uisa in templo arca testamenti, subaudis, sanguinis et aquae sacramenta, quibus aedificatur Ecclesia. Sicut enim ex costa Adae dormientis formata est mulier, sic ex latere Christi pendentis in cruce fabricata est Ecclesia. Vnde nec inmerito aperto lancea latere, cum exisset sanguis et aqua, Iohannes dixisse cognoscitur : Et qui uidit, testimonium perhibuit. Ac si aliis uerbis diceret : Qui arcam Dei in templo aperto uidit, quod uerum esset quia uideret, testimonium perhibuit. In caelo autem ut diceret, in conspectu suo intellegi uoluit. De illorum enim numero erat, de quibus scriptum meminerat : Caeli enarrant gloriam Dei, et opera manuum eius adnuntiat firmamentum. Sequitur:

ET FACTA SUNT FULGORA, ET VOCES, ET TONITRUA ET TERRAMOTUS, ET GRANDO MAGNA.

Quid per fulgora, nisi, ut saepe iam diximus, miraculorum signa figurantur ? Fulgur quippe terrorem incutit, ac subita coruscatione humanam uirtutem debilitat. Quod omnino recte miraculis congruit, quibus incredulorum mentes perculsae, fractis mox superbiae uiribus, humilitati se subdiderunt. Hinc per Psalmistam Domino dicitur : Fulgora multiplicabis, et conturbabis eos. Fulgora etenim multiplicauit, quia uidelicet innumera miraculorum signa per Apostolos atque apostolicos uiros per orbem ostendit. Conturbauit uero eos, subaudis resistentes sibi aduersarios, a propria fortitudine deiecit. Hinc rursum alius Psalmus dicit : Inluxerunt coruscationes tuae orbi terrae, uidit et commota est terra. Quid autem aliud uocibus, quam praedicationes Ecclesiae designantur ? Vnde et merito septem tonitrua uoces suas locuta fuisse memorantur. Bene autem prius fiunt fulgora ac deinde subsequuntur uoces, quia nimirum praedicatores sancti ut corda infidelium ad noua credenda loquendo perducerent, prius noua miracula exhibuerunt. Hinc est quod Petrus, ut Iudaeorum mentes ad fidem uerbis informaret, prius ad portam templi paralyticum curauit. Hinc Paulus, ut populum Militenen praedicando conuertat, a dysenteria patrem Publii sanat. Post noces uero tonitrua fiunt, ut hi qui forte miracula contemnunt, uerba despiciunt, terrore iudicii quatiantur. Post tonitrua quoque fiunt terraemotus, id est, persecutio ingens paganorum. Recte etiam hi qui persecutionem commouent, per grandinem designantur. Grando quippe, etsi fruges terrae inlisa comminuit, comminuendo tamen et ipsa comminuitur, fitque ut et grando funditus deficiat, et terra denuo fructificet. Sic nimirum, sic certe furens gentilium turba, dum nomen Christi funditus de terra auferre conata est, ipsa ad nihilum redacta est, aut uiribus scilicet, aut certe commutatione in melius. Plures etenim de his qui Ecclesiam Dei persecuti sunt, ad fidem Mediatoris redierunt, et coeperunt pati quod ipsi prius aliis inferebant. Sequitur :

ET SIGNUM MAGNUM PARUIT IN CAELO: MULIER AMICTA SOLE, ET LUNA SUB PEDIBUS EIUS

Vt hoc signum peteret, Achaz a Domino admonitum nouimus, dicentis : Pete tibi signum a Domino Deo tuo in profundum inferni, siue in excelsum supra. Vbi cum idem perfidus rex responderet : Non petam, et non temptabo Dominum, protinus ad domum Dauid sermo dirigitur, quo dicatur : Propter hoc dabit Dominus ipse uobis signum. Ecce uirgo concipiet et pariet filium, et uocabunt nomen eius Emmanuhel. Hoc certe signum nunc usque uidetur in caelo, id est, in Ecclesia sanctorum. Dicatur itaque apertius quod sit hoc signum. Denique subditur : Mulier amicta sole. Ac si diceretur, beata semperque uirgo Maria, obumbrata Altissimi uirtute, cui uidelicet dictum ab Angelo scimus : Spiritus Sanctus superueniet in te, et uirtus Altissimi obumbrabit tibi, illa scilicet uirtus, de qua Paulus dicit : Christum Dei uirtutem et Dei sapientiam. Et quia plerumque genus inuenitur in specie, ipsa beata ac pia Virgo hoc in loco personam gerit Ecclesiae, quae nouos cotidie populos parit, ex quibus generale Mediatoris corpus formatur. Non autem mirum, si illa typum Ecclesiae praetendat, in cuius beato utero capiti suo eadem Ecclesia uniri meruit. Nam et in sequenti lectione aliqua narrantur, quae iuxta litteram beatae Virgini specialiter congruere non possunt, sed electorum Ecclesiae secundum mysticam narrationem generaliter conueniunt. Sequamur ergo per omnia genus in specie, et totum etiam quod uni aptari posse uidemus, de omnibus dictum intellegamus. Dicatur igitur mulier amicta sole, quod omnino aptissime fidelium animabus conuenit. An non solis amictu uestiuntur, quibus per Paulum dicitur : Quotquot baptizati estis, Christum industis ? Christus enim sol iustitiae et candor lucis aeternae. De hoc nimirum sole impii in inferno dicturi sunt : Sol non ortus est nobis. Quo contra electi audiunt : Vobis qui timetis Dominum orietur sol iustitiae.

Quid autem hoc loco designatur per lunam, nisi mutabilitas rerum temporalium, Quia enim per incrementa temporum luna deficit, recte per eam defectus mutabilitis signatur. Qui igitur corporalium rerum cuncta labentia despicit, quasi lunam sub pedibus premit. Possunt autem per lunam, quae sub pedibus mulieris consistit, heretici designari, non quo semper tempore manifestationis eorum, superior illis saeculari potentia extiterit Ecclesia, praesertim cum saepius ab illis fuerit obpressa, sed quo ueritate luminis qua totum corpus uestitur, obtenebrati atque defecti, ita ab statu eiusdem corporis merito reprobationis ceciderunt, ut saltem ne ad ultima eius membra, quae designantur in pedibus, pertinere meruerint, sed in his potius delectari, in his toto mentis adnisu uersari, quae sancti totis uiribus appetunt conculcare, id est, prauis dogmatibus ac mundi istius uanis honoribus. Sub pedibus ergo electorum sunt, quia ima quaerunt, quia terrenis inhiant. Non autem mirum, si unde alii prouectum stabilitatis, inde alii defectum incurrant mutabilitatis, et unde alii tamquam sol lucent, inde alii tamquam luna deficiant, cum Symeon Domino dicat : Ecce positus est hic in ruinam et in resurrectionem multorum in Israhel. Quorum mutabilitatis defectum bene Salomon indicat, dicens : Stultus ut luna mutabitur. Quid enim stultius, sibique magis contrarium, quam quod heretici de Christo opinantur ? Aliter itaque de illo sentit Valentinus, aliter Bardesanes, aliter Apollenarius, aliter Arrius, aliter Sabellius, aliter Fotinus, et paene rari inueniuntur, qui sibi in suis sententiis concordari uideantur. Et quid in his nisi stultitiam, quid in his nisi defectum lunae ac mutabilitatem intellegimus ? Et ab his pro certo integritas Christi persequitur, qui mutabilitatis ac fidei defectum patientes, in imis sub pedibus iacere uidentur. Haec autem quae de hereticis intelleximus, falsis possunt Christianis aptari, qui et terrenis cupiditatibus inhiant, et prauis moribus electorum uitam excruciant. Possunt etiam uocabulo lunae illi non inconuenienter exprimi, qui ita rerum curas ecclesiasticarum agere uidentur, ut nil de exterioribus spiritales uiri tractare cogantur, fit que ut dum hi terrenis inherent, Ecclesia in spiritalibus uiris terram minime tangat. Sequitur :

ET IN CAPITE EIUS CORONA STELLARUM DUODECIM

Sicut saepe iam diximus, et omnes uerae fidei tractatores dixerunt, Dominus et Ecclesia una persona est, caput et membra unum sunt corpus. In capite ergo suo coronatur Ecclesia, id est, in Christo Iesu, de quo per Paulum dicitur : Ipse est caput omnium Ecclesiarum. In duodecim autem stellis, quibus aptatur regis corona, quid aliud quam Apostolos intellegere debemus, qui primi capiti nostro inheserunt, qui primi ornamentum eiusdem capitis extiterunt ? Et recte per stellas designantur, quia tenebras ignorantiae radio ueritatis inlustrare probantur. Vnde et Angelus generaliter de cunctis uerae fidei praedicatoribus Daniheli loquitur, dicens : Qui docti fuerint, fulgebunt quasi stellae firmamenti : et qui ad iustitiam erudiunt multos, quasi stellae in perpetuas aeternitates. Hinc Paulus dicit : In medio nationis prauae et peruersae, inter quos lucetis sicut luminaria in mundo, uerbum uitae continentes. Quamquam autem in Apostolorum numero omnes fidei praedicatores tamquam genus in specie possint uideri, ideo tamen illi specialiter ac principaliter corona capitis extiterunt, quia primum per eos ipsum caput de toto mundo uictoriam reportauit. Sequitur :

ET IN UTERO HABENS, CLAMAT PARTURIENS, ET CRUCIATUR UT PARIAT

Haec beatae Virgini Mariae secundum litteram aptari nequeunt, quia cruciatum in partu habere non potuit, quae nullum peccatum libidinis in conceptu contraxit. Sed iuxta mysticum intellectum ad Ecclesiam certissime refertur, cuius excellentissimum membrum ipsa beata Virgo esse cognoscitur. Idcirco autem electorum Ecclesia mulier uocatur, non quo mollis in fide uel actu, sed quo Redemptoris sui corpus in credentibus populis cotidie pariat. Nisi enim Ecclesia Christum pareret, nequaquam eidem eius Filius diceret : Quicumque fecerit uoluntatem Patris mei qui in caelis est, hic meus frater et soror et mater est. Nequaquam et Psalmista diceret : Mater Sion dicet homo, et factus est in ea, et ipse fundauit eam Altissimus. An non in credentibus Christum Paulus generat, qui dicebat : Etsi multa milia pedagogorum habeatis in Christo Iesu, sed non multos patres. Nam in Christo per Euangelium ego uos genui ? Sed usquequo Ecclesia pariat, parturiens clamat, et cruciatur ut pariat, quia nisi ad tempus ultimum peruenerit, quo perfecte filium enixat, quando iam nil de corpore supersit, quandam partus difficultatem hic patitur, dum in quibusdam quos iam pepererat, denuo parturit. Talibus namque quasi mater parturiens et gemens dicebat Paulus : Filioli mei, quos iterum parturio, donec formetur Christus in uobis. Vsquequo ergo, sicut idem Apostolus dicit, occurramus omnes in unitatem fidei et agnitionis Filii Dei, in uirum perfectum, in mensuram aetatis plenitudinis Christi. Mater Ecclesia parturiens clamat, et cruciatur ut pariat, sed cum ad tempus uel horam illam peruenerit, qua ultima corporis membra ad lucem fidei nascendo procedant, tunc cessabit cruciatus ac parturitionis clamor, tunc in obliuionem ueniet gemitus pressurarum, et succedet inenarrabilis laetitia futurorum bonorum. Vnde et Dominus in Euangelio dicit : Mulier cum parit, tristitiam habet, quia uenit hora eius ; cum autem pepererit masculum, iam non meminit pressurae propter gaudium, quia natus est homo in mundo. Quid autem esset quod dicebat, ipse exposuit, dicens : Ita et uos nunc quidem tristitiam habetis, ueniam autem ad uos iterum et gaudebit cor uestrum, et gaudium uestrum nemo tollet a uobis. Sequitur :

In vol. XXVII B, Ambrosius Autpertus, Part 3, there is a “Sermo de Adsumptione Sanctae Mariae”, of which the following are the first three sections (pp. 1027-8):

1. Behold, beloved brothers, the day is greatly revered, the day surpassing the solemnities of all saints. Here, I say, is the glorious day, the illustrious day on which the Virgin Mary is believed to have departed from this world. And so with utmost exultation, the whole earth, illuminated by such a Virgin's departure, raises its praises. For it is truly unworthy that the solemnity of her memory among us should be without great honor, through whom we merited to receive the Author of life. And it is deemed quite preposterous that while we celebrate the victories of the saints and martyrs, we do not prefer her solemnity above theirs, oh she who brought forth the Prince of Martyrs to this world. On this day, fittingly, the Virgin Mary proclaims to her heavenly bridegroom: "You have taken hold of my right hand, and in your will, you have led me, and with glory, you have taken me up." Today, I say, she also fittingly hears from the bridegroom and the Lord: "Behold, winter has passed, the rain has gone and departed, rise my closest one, my bride, my dove, and come."

2. We say this, brothers, because as the Church in the custom of Christ has already accepted, the Virgin Mary is traditionally said to have been taken to the heavens on this day. But in what order she moved from here to the heavenly realms, no catholic history tells. Not only does the Church of God say to reject the apocryphal but also to be ignorant of them. Indeed, some things have been written about her assumption without the author's name, which, as I said, are treated so cautiously that they are hardly allowed to be read to confirm the truth of the matter. Some are indeed perplexed because her body is not found on earth, nor is her assumption with flesh, as read in the apocryphal, found in catholic history. To them, it must be said that if the body of Moses is not found on earth, with whom God spoke face to face, it is foolish to seek that of her through whom God of majesty was incarnated on earth. For it is not fitting for anyone to be anxious about knowledge of her body, whom they do not doubt reigns with Christ, elevated above the angels. It should suffice human knowledge to truly confess her as the queen of heaven, for she bore the king of angels.

3. Nor is there found among the Latins any writer who has spoken openly about her death. For when Ambrose of blessed memory was interpreting that verse from the Gospel in which Simeon says to the Mother of the Lord: "And a sword will pierce your own soul too", he says: "Neither history nor scripture teaches that Mary ended her life with a sword." Hence also Isidore says: "It is uncertain," he says, "whether by this word he meant the sword of the spirit or the sword of persecution." But what should I say about these things of which I speak when even John the Evangelist, who took her into his own before the Lord's cross, has not left anything in writing for posterity about this? For no one could narrate this more faithfully, if God had wished it to be revealed, than he who took her in to care for her and, against custom, did not leave his mother. It remains then, that man should not falsely fabricate openly what God wished to remain hidden. However, the true sentiment about her assumption is proven to be this, that according to the Apostle, whether in body or out of the body, not knowing, we believe she was taken up above the angels.

1. Adest, dilectissimi fratres, dies ualde uenerabilis, dies omnium sanctorum sollemnitates praecellens. Adest, inquam, dies praeclara, dies inclita, dies in qua e mundo migrasse creditur Virgo Maria. Et ideo cum summa exultatione laudes intonet uniuersa terra tantae Virginis inlustrata excessu, quia et indignum ualde est, ut illius recordationis sollemnitas sit apud nos sine maximo honore, per quam meruimus suscipere uitae auctorem, satisque praeposterum iudicandum est, ut cum sanctorum celebremus uictorias Martyrum, illius sollemnitatem illis non praeferamus, o quae huic mundo edidit Principem Martyrum. In hac siquidem die conpetenter sponso illi caelesti proclamat Virgo Maria: Tenuisti manum dexteram meam, et in uoluntate tua deduxisti me, et cum gloria adsumpsisti me. Hodie, inquam, et ipsa ab sponso et Domino congrue audit : Iam hiemps transiit, imber abiit et recessit, surge proxima mea, sponsa mea, columba mea et ueni.

2. Hoc idcirco dicimus, fratres, quia sicut iam in consuetudinem Christi suscepit Ecclesia, hodierna die ad caelos adsumpta fuisse traditur Virgo Maria. Sed quo ordine hinc ad superna transierit regna, nulla catholica narrat historia. Non solum autem respuere apocryfa, uerum etiam ignorare dicitur haec eadem Dei Ecclesia. Et quidem sunt nonnulla sine auctoris nomine de eius adsumptione conscripta, quae, ut dixi, ita cauentur, ut ad confirmandam rei ueritatem legi minime permittantur. Hinc sane pulsantur nonnulli, quia nec corpus eius in terra inuenitur, nec adsumptio eius cum carne, ut in apocrypha legitur, in catholica historia reperitur. Quibus dicendum est, quia si Moysi corpus ab homine non inuenitur in terris, cum quo locutus est Deus facie ad faciem, illius quaerere dementiae est, per quam idem maiestatis Deus incarnatus effulsit in terris. Neque enim dignum est de corporis eius notitia sollicitum quempiam esse, quam non dubitat super angelos eleuatam cum Christo regnare. Sufficere debet tantum notitiae humanae hanc uere fateri reginam caelorum, pro eo quod regem peperit angelorum.

3. Sed nec inuenitur apud Latinos aliquis tractatorum de eius morte quippiam aperte dixisse. Nam cum illud Euangelii uersiculum quo Symeon dicit ad Domini Matrem : Et tuam ipsius animam pertransibit gladius, beatae recordationis tractaret Ambrosius, ait : Nec historia nec littera docet, Mariam gladio uitam finisse. Hinc et Isidorus : Incertum est, inquit , per hoc dictum, utrum gladium spiritus an gladium, dixerit persecutionis. Sed quid de his de quibus loquor dicam, cum nec ipse qui hanc ante crucem Domini accepit in sua, id est Iohannes euangelista, de hoc posteris aliquid retinendum scriptis mandauit ? Nullus enim hoc fidelius narrare potuit, si illud Deus manifestari uoluisset, quam ille utique qui hanc nutriendam suscepit, nec contra morem filius matrem reliquit. Restat ergo, ut homo mendaciter non fingat apertum, quod Deus uoluit manere occultum. Vera autem de eius adsumptione sententia haec esse probatur, ut secundum Apostolum, siue in corpore, siue extra corpus ignorantes, adsumptam super angelos credamus.

You will note that in his discussion of Revelation 12, he makes no reference to Mary's Bodily Assumption. Moreover, when actually preaching on the occasion of the Feast of the Assumption, he declines to adopt a Bodily Assumption view.

Monday, August 28, 2023

James Durham (1658) Commentary on Revelation at Revelation 1:4, 4:8, 11:17, and 16:5

At Revelation 1:4 (p. 5)

The Persons from whom, are Three, or, the Three Persons of the Trinity. 1. From the Father, which is which was and which is to come, that is from God the Father described from his eternal Being without all beginning or ending. And this Description of the Father relates to that of Exod. 14, "I AM THAT I AM hath sent me unto you," and it is a Name that God often taketh to himself: The first and the last, the beginning and the ending, and the Title JEHOVAH taketh up these three JE the future time HO the time present VAH the time past. In a word it's the Paraphrase of the Word JEHOVAH and this Title is attributed to the Father not secluding the Son and holy Ghost, but the Father, being the Fountain of the Godhead, when he is joined with the Son and Spirit those things that are essential to God are ordinarily attributed to him.

At Revelation 4:8 (p. 352)

The third Attribute mentioned, is, His Eternity, in these words, which was, and is, and is to come: wherof often hath been spoken; and it is mentioned to advance the Glory of God infinitely beyond all created Idols who have had their beginning, and are going on unto a decay, and will ere long come to be destroyed: but the portion of Jacob is not so, who in all the tossings of the world, continueth the same, and of His years there is no end.

At Rev. 11:17 (p. 645)

In the first, vers. 17, they begin with God's title, Lord God Almighty, which art, and wast, and art to come: it was spoken of before, and is here applied, to show ...

At Rev. 16:5 (p. 779)

1. That commended, is God's eternity and unchangeableness, it is the same with His name JEHOVAH, these three syllables making up this, which art, and wast, and shall be; and it especially relates to God's faithfulness when He is now known by that Name as He was to Israel, Exod. 3, and that other pitched upon, is God's justice, not simply, but as proportioning suitable judgments to the party plagued.

Early Commentaries on Revelation (with a Focus on Revelation 1:4 and 16:5)

Alcuin of York (d. A.D. 804) Commentary on Revelation (the available text ends at Rev. 12:12)(source)

  • At Revelation 1:4-5 Alcuin's Commentary has (source)

VERSES 4-5

John to the seven churches which are in Asia. By the number seven is represented the universal Church, because of the seven gifts of him who has filled the earth. Hence Elisha made the child upon whom he lay gape seven times,1 because the people that died from unfaithfulness is brought back to life by the seven gifts of the Holy Spirit. So the number seven is perfect, being formed by the number three and the number four; for the number three is considered perfect in the divine Scriptures because of the mystery of the Trinity, because of the three virtues: faith, hope, and love, or because of the three classes of the faithful: preachers, celibates, and married people. As for the number four, it is perfect because of the four parts of the world, because of the four cardinal virtues (namely prudence, temperance, courage, and justice) or because of the four books of the Gospels. Therefore, because knowledge of the Trinity encompasses the four cardinal points of the sky, because hope, faith, and love complete the sum of the four cardinal virtues, or because the three classes of believers submit to the commandments of the four Gospels, it is right for the universal Church to be symbolized by this number seven. One should nonetheless know that it was especially to the seven churches of the Ephesians that he sent these mysteries he wrote in exile. So species is not excluded, but in the species a genus is shown, namely the universal Church. It is appropriate to say that the universal Church is in Asia, for Asia translates to “pride.” The word “pride” is not always used to refer to a vice, but sometimes to the summit of virtue, as in I will make thee to be the pride of worlds,2 that is “I will make you despise all pleasures and low honors;” and elsewhere, He hath lifted thee up above the height of the earth.3 So it is in this height of pride that the Church takes its place. Alternatively, if “pride” is being used to refer to a vice, we should not take it to mean that the Church will remain proud, but that it was raised in the arrogance of pride some time ago, but is predestined to become humble through a heavenly gift, according to this: Hast thou entered into the storehouses of the snow, or has thou beheld the treasures of the hail: Which I have prepared for the time of the enemy, against the day of battle and war?4

Grace be unto you and peace from him that is, and that was, and that is to come, and from the seven spirits which are in the sight of his throne, and from Jesus Christ. Grace means forgiveness granted freely,5 and it is with it shining on us when we were servants of sin that we were adopted as children of justice. It is this grace that Peter and Paul first mentioned in their salutations when they were about to write to the faithful, in order to show, before exhorting the peoples of grace, that the whole sum of the salutation was in this grace. It is proper for grace to

(1) 2 Kings 4:32 et seq.

(2) Is. 60:15.

(3) Cf. Is. 58:14. Note that one of the Latin words for « pride » (the one used in the Latin text in «« Asia » translates to « pride ». The word « pride »... »), elatio, also means « elevation » and derives from the verb used in the Latin in « he hath lifted thee up». The word used for « pride » in the Isaiah quote is a different one.

(4) Job 38:22-23.

(5) « Freely » = gratis, which is nothing else but the ablative plural of gratia, which means, among other things, « gratitude », « grace », and, in the plural, « thanks ». Hence gratis means literally « for thanks (and nothing more) ».

be put before peace, because no one could have come to God's peace reconciled if the grace of mercy had not preceded them. As for the fact that he says from him that is, and that was, and that is to come, it should be taken as referring specifically to the only-begotten Son of God. He is in essence with the Father and the Holy Spirit, and has never been affected by mutability, according to this saying of Paul's: There was not in him « it is » and « it is not », but « it is » was in him,1 because, before he was born of the Virgin in time, he spent all times with the Father. Whence the same John says, in the beginning was the Word.2 It is also the same who is to come to judge the living and the dead in the humanity he assumed, as it is written: He shall so come, as you have seen him going into heaven.3 So, since it is certain that the Church has received this grace from the Son and the Holy Spirit as well as from the Father through the Son and the Holy Spirit, why is the person of the Father not mentioned in this passage? Because it is habitual in the sacred Scriptures, where one or two of the persons of the Trinity are mentioned, for the whole Trinity to be understood at the same time. As for the words from the seven spirits, he says this because of the sevenfold operation of one spirit; and this spirit is said to be alone in the sight of the throne, that is of the Church, that is in the memory of the saints, because it is to this same spirit in particular that the remission of sins is ascribed, according to this: Receive ye the Holy Ghost: whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them.4 Or if not, then surely the whole Trinity is understood in the Spirit. In saying from Jesus Christ, he mentions the person of the Son again, because the one referred to existed before the ages, and was made man in the end of the ages.

Who is the faithful witness, the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. It is obviously a way of speaking when he calls Christ specifically the faithful witness, while there are three who give testimony: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, and the three are one God.5 One may also call the Son specifically, in the role of man he assumed, a faithful witness, in that he went as far as the death of the flesh for the sake of the testimony of the truth. For while the whole Church, in the holy preachers, gives testimony concerning Christ, the ones called martyrs, that is “witnesses,” 6 are principally those who suffered physical death for Christ. He is called first begotten because no one before him rose never to die. A different interpretation would be that all the saints are dead to the world, as it is said in for you are dead,7 but he is so in a special way, because there has been no sin in him. By the kings, he means either all the saints, who know how to govern themselves well, or at any rate the preachers, who become partners with the good but raise themselves above the wicked, like Peter above Ananias,8

(1) Variant of 2 Cor. 1:19. There would actually be no difference in Latin between « it is » and « he is ».

(2) John 1:1.

(3) Acts 1:11.

(4) John 20:22-23.

(5) Cf. 1 John 5:7.

(6) The word « martyr » comes from Greek, where it means « witness ».

(7) Col. 3:3.

(8) Acts 5:1 et seq.

and Paul who brandishes his scepter, saying, What will you? shall I come to you with a rod?1 Because he hath loved us. How he has loved us, the pains he suffered clearly show. He did not however love us as we were, that is wicked ones, but as he made us by love itself. Whence it is added right afterwards, and washed us from our sins in his own blood; but in what way he has washed us in his own blood, the apostle indicated, saying, All we, who are baptized in Christ Jesus, are baptized in his death.2

 Alcuin of York (d. A.D. 804) Questions and Answers on Revelation (source)

  • At Revelation 1:4-5 Alcuin's Q/A has (source):

(1:4-5) QUESTION: What does it mean that John salutes only seven churches whereas the Master of truth says, Go ye into the whole world, and preach to every creature?6 ANSWER: Through these seven churches, he writes to the whole Church. Indeed totality is often represented by the number seven, because all this worldly time flies by in cycles of seven days. THERE FOLLOWS: Grace be unto you and peace from him that is, and that was, and that is to come, and from the seven spirits. ANSWER: He wishes the pious people grace and peace from God the eternal Father, the sevenfold Spirit, and Jesus Christ, who gave testimony to the Father in the human form he assumed. He names the Son in the third place as he is going to say more about him. He also names him last because he is the first and the last, and he has already named him together with the Father when he said that is to come. The first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth.

(1) Cf. 1.1 in the previous commentary, and note (3) on p.5.

(2) Luke 11:27-28.

(3) Rev. 22:17.

(4) There may be a mistranscription in the Latin and « love » may have been originally intended, as the Latin words look similar.

(5) Acts 1:1.

(6) Mark 16:15.

=============================

Glossa Ordinaria (medieval - hard to date) (on Revelation) (only chapter 1 is transcribed in this online source):

  • At Revelation 1:4, the GO has (source)(p. 7):

1:4 John to the seven churches which are in (a)Asia. (b)Grace to you and (c)peace from (d)him (e)that is, and (f)that was, and (g)that shall come, and from (h)the seven spirits which are (i)in the sight of his throne,

a.  I.e. pride.*

b.  I.e. remission of sins.

c.  I.e. rest from vices.

d.  I.e. Christ.

e.  Sc. incorruptible according to his divinity.

f.  Sc. once born eternally.

g.  Such, even if he does not appear such now.*

h.  I.e. the sevenfold Spirit, which is one in nature, but manifold in the distribution of graces.

i.  Angels  and  holy  men  are  thrones,  in  whom  he  now  sits  and judges,  not  to  judge  in  the  future;  in  whom  God  sits, illuminating them.

To the seven churches. God gave it to Christ, Christ to John, and John to the churches; principally to those to which he had been appointed as a master, and to the others through a simile.

Or by seven all the churches are meant, because seven signifies universality, or because they are illumined by a sevenfold spirit.

Ephesus was the metropolitan city or capital of all Asia, where John was exercising superintendence.

In Asia. Asia means pride. So the Church is now in the pride of virtues, and1 was formerly in the pride of vices.

This Asia is not the big one (i.e. the one that is said to be the third part of the world), but some province in which there were seven cities, and seven churches with seven bishops.2

Asia Minor is a part of greater Asia; it contains seven cities of which Ephesus is the metropolis. Paul preached the Gospel in this Asia Minor (Acts 16), but afterwards, with the division of the apostles, John was put in charge of it.3

Grace and peace. He prepares the listeners to be favorable and attentive, as he did also in the prologue.

And from the seven spirits. "Spirit" denotes the same as "love"; whence the remission of sins and other gifts, which are gifts of the whole Trinity, are attributed to the Spirit, so that we may understand that the Trinity works out of love alone.

He passes over in silence the person of the Father, because no one had misunderstood what concerns God the Creator; he mentions the person of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, concerning whom the heresies of Marcion and Terebinthus arise in the churches.4

[[1.4 (a) *Only in Latin 588.] (e), (f), (g) *Instead of (e), Codex 24 has "Eternally, even though he was born in his time"; it does not have (f), but does have (g); it also has an additional marginal gloss saying "Incorruptible since long ago, now also immutable according to his humanity". Rusch has one marginal glass combining different elements of all this with some variations: "Eternally, even though he was born in his time; now immutable through his humanity, and once corruptible; he shall come such, even if he does not appear such now".] 1 Codex 24 and Rusch: "or".] 2 Only in Rusch.] 3 Only in Rusch.] 4 Instead of "the heresies of Marcion and Terebinthus", Codex 24 and Rusch have "all heresies".]] 

  • At Revelation 1:4, the GO has (pp. 31-32):

4:8 (a)And the four beasts, every one of them has six wings (b)round about: and (c)within they are full of eyes; and (d)they had no rest (e)day and night, saying, (f)Holy, Holy, Holy, (g)Lord God Omnipotent, (h)which was, and (i)which is, and (j)which is to come.

a. As if he were saying: And in order to proclaim these things about Christ, they had been well instructed.

b. I.e. they instruct simpler people by the literal meaning.

c. And the more perfect ones by allegory.*

d. I.e. they did not stop.

e. I.e. in prosperity and in adversity, or every day*

f. Thrice because there is Trinity in persons.

g. Once because there is unity in majesty.

h. Without beginning.

i. Immutable.

j. The Son will appear corporally, because* the whole deity will manifest itself to the faithful.

The first wing is the natural law, the second one the law of Moses, the third one the prophecies1, the fourth one the Gospel, the fifth one the teachings of the apostles, and the sixth one those of all these, like Augustine and others2, through whom3 the Church strives for what is high, and from whom preachers receive the support for all preaching4. Or the six wings are the knowledge of the works of God made in six days, by whose knowledge those who do good works in them are lifted up on high.

And round about and within. Or because they keep themselves clean, and instruct others by their examples. Or because they illuminate them in the middle and in the far ends of the earth.

They are full of eyes within, i.e. they are clean in their conscience, and round about, i.e. they are irreprehensible in the sight of men. 

[[4:8 (b) and (c) * The Vulgates of all three books have << and round about and within they are full of eyes >>, instead of putting << round about >> with << has six wings >> .] (e) *Codex 24 and Rusch have << continuously >> instead of << every day >>, the former perhaps making more sense.] (j) *The word << because >> only in Latin 588.] 1 Codex 24 and Rusch : << the prophets >>.] 2 Codex 24 has only << like Augustine >> ; Rusch has << like Augustine, Gregory and Ambrose >>.] 3 Codex 24 and Rusch : << through which >>.  The following << whom >> could in theory also be << which >>, the Latin form being the same in this case.] 4 Codex 24 and Rusch : << the foundation of all preaching >>.

  • At Revelation 11:17, the GO has (p. 64):

11:17 saying: (a)We thank you Lord God Omnipotent, (b)which are, and (c)which were, and which shall come: (d)because you have received* your** (e)great power, (f)and have reigned.

a. Because you have saved us and damned our enemies.

b. Immutable.

c. Who were once despised.

d. By rising again, giving the Spirit to your people, and assembling the Church.

e. For your kingdom.*

f. I.e. you have defended your people from the Devil, destroying the Devil's power*

11:17 In the verse: *Latin 588's Vulgate has "which are, and which were, and which have received"; Codex 24 "which are, and which were, and which shall come, which have received". **Latin 588 does not have "your".] (c) *Codex 24 and Rusch: "Once when you were despised".] (e) *In Codex 24 and Rusch, this, with the addition of "and" at the beginning of the next verse, "And the Gentiles were angry".] (f) *"Destroying the Devil's power" only in Latin 588. 

  • At Revelation 16:5, the GO has (p. 90):

16:5 And I heard (a)the (b)angel (c)of the waters, (d)saying: You are (e)just O (f)Lord, (g)(h)which are, and (i)which were, (j)the Holy One, (k)because you have* judged these things:

a. I.e. the leading preachers, sc. the apostles.*

b. Guardian.*

c. Of the Scriptures or of the peoples.*

d. I.e. praising in his inward emotion.*

e. Sc. by keeping equity.*

f. Sc. by presiding over all.*

g. He does not say "which shall come" because he understands that it will happen soon.

h. Sc. immutably.*

i. Sc. essentially.*

j. Sc. formally and effectively.*

k. Who have damned those wicked by our agency.

I heard, i.e. I understood, the very preachers1 who will do this retribution attributing it not to themselves, but to the Lord, and affirming that it is done justly.

In the sixth seal and in the sixth angel he often spoke of the same wicked, but in this respect, that he showed what and how great tribulations they inflicted on saints, and even if there was some word there concerning the damnation of the wicked, it was put incidentally in order to encourage the suffering ones; here, on the other hand, he speaks only about the plagues which they themselves inflict on the wicked2.3

16:5 In the verse: Latin 588 and Rusch have "who have" instead of "because you have". Only one letter of a word differs between the two in Latin.] (a) *Only in Latin 588.] (b) *Not in Latin 588.] (c) *Only in Rusch.] (d) *Only in Rusch.] (e) *Only in Rusch.] (f) *Only in Rusch.] (h) *Only in Rusch.] (i) *Only in Rusch.] (j) *Only in Rusch.] 1 Codex 24: "all the preachers".] 2 Codex 24 and Rusch: "which the saints themselves will inflict on the wicked".] 3 in Codex 24 and Rusch, this gloss is placed earlier, somewhere near verse 1 or 2.

=============================

Bede on Revelation (online)

  • At Revelation 1:4, Bede writes (source): 

4

seven. By these seven churches he writes to every church, for universality is wont to be denoted by the number seven, in that all the time of this age is evolved from seven days.

Grace. Grace he desires for us, and peace from God, the eternal Father, and from the sevenfold Spirit, and from Jesus Christ, Who gave testimony to the Father in His Incarnation. He names the Son in the third place, as he was to speak further of Him. He names Him also the last in order, as He is the first and the last; for He had already named Him in the Father by saying, "Who was to come."

=============================

Victorinus on Revelation (the Sixteenth chapter is not addressed)(source)

  • At Revelation 1:4, Victorinus writes (source):

4. Grace unto you, and peace, from Him which is, and which was, and which is to come. He is, because He endures continually; He was, because with the Father He made all things, and has at this time taken a beginning from the Virgin; He is to come, because assuredly He will come to judgment.

And from the seven spirits which are before His throne. We read of a sevenfold spirit in Isaiah, — namely, the spirit of wisdom and of understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, of knowledge and of piety, and the spirit of the fear of the Lord.

Victorinus, Commentary on the Apocalypse, Ancient Christian Texts Series, "Latin Commentaries on Revelation," (p. 1)

  • At Revelation 1:

1. At the beginning of the book he promises blessedness to the one who reads and to the one who hears and to the one who lee[s what is written, so that by attending to the reading one might learn good works and safeguard that which it commands. "Grace to you and peace from God who is and who was and who is to come."[FN1: Victorinus is the first Western witness for the reading "from God." He attributes the three predicates to Jesus, thereby making a strong claim to the divinity of Jesus. Tertullian had already attributed the three phrases to Christ (Against Praxeas 17:4 [ANF 3.613])] He was because he made all things with the Father and did not acquire a beginning from the Virgin. To be sure, he is going to come for judgment.[FN2: The recension of Jerome reads at the beginning "he is because he continually exists" (permanet).] "From the sevenfold Spirit." We read in Isaiah, "a Spirit of wisdom and understanding, of counsel and strength, of knowledge and piety, a Spirit of the fear of the Lord."[FN3: Is 11:2-3 "Fear of the Lord," as in MS A (so read by Dulaey, SC 423:46). Hausleiter reads "fear of God," following MSS from the Jerome recension (CSEL 49:18). ] These seven gifts are of one Spirit, that is, they are gifts of the Holy Spirit. 


=============================

Ambrosiaster Questions and Answers on Revelation (Questions 65 and 72 pertain to Revelation 10:8)

=============================

Origen - Commentary on John, Book I, Chapter XL (link)

Having expiscated the “to us” and the “absolutely”—sanctification and redemption being “to us” and not absolute, wisdom and redemption both to us and absolute—we must not omit to enquire into the position of righteousness in the same passage.  That Christ is righteousness relatively to us appears clearly from the words:  “Who was made to us of God wisdom and righteousness and sanctification and redemption.”  And if we do not find Him to be righteousness absolutely as He is the wisdom and the power of God absolutely, then we must enquire whether to Christ Himself, as the Father is sanctification, so the Father is also righteousness.  There is, we know, no unrighteousness with God; [John 7:18] He is a righteous and holy Lord [Rev. 16:5], and His judgments are in righteousness [Rev. 16:7], and being righteous, He orders all things righteously.

=============================

Denys (aka Dionysius the Areopagite), The Divine Names, Chapter II (source) 

If, instead of applying these to the whole Godhead, they wrest them to include only one part Thereof, how will they explain such passages as: “Thus saith He that is and was and is to come, the Almighty,”172 or: “Thou art the same,”173 or “The Spirit of Truth that is, and that proceedeth from the Father”?174 And if they deny that the whole Godhead is Life, how can that Sacred Word be true Which declared “As the Father raiseth the dead and quickeneth them, even so the Son quickeneth whom He will,”175 and also, “It is the Spirit that quickeneth”?176

172Rev. i. 4.

173Ps. cii. 27.

174John xv. 26.

175John v. 21.

176John vi. 63.

=============================

Athanasius, Against the Arians, Discourse I, Chapter IV, Section 11 (source):

11. At his suggestion then ye have maintained and ye think, that ‘there was once when the Son was not;’ this is the first cloke of your views of doctrine which has to be stripped off. Say then what was once when the Son was not, O slanderous and irreligious men1881? If ye say the Father, your blasphemy is but greater; for it is impious to say that He was ‘once,’ or to signify Him by the word ‘once.’ For He is ever, and is now, and as the Son is, so is He, and is Himself He that is, and Father of the Son. But if ye say that the Son was once, when He Himself was not, the answer is foolish and unmeaning. For how could He both be and not be? In this difficulty, you can but answer, that there was a time when the Word was not; for your very adverb ‘once’ naturally signifies this. And your other, ‘The Son was not before His generation,’ is equivalent to saying, ‘There was once when He was not,’ for both the one and the other signify that there is a time before the Word. Whence then this your discovery? Why do ye, as ‘the heathen, rage, and imagine vain phrases against the Lord1882 and against His Christ?’ for no holy Scripture has used such language of the Saviour, but rather ‘always’ and ‘eternal’ and ‘coexistent always with the Father.’ For, ‘In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God1883.’ And in the Apocalypse he thus speaks1884; ‘Who is and who was and who is to come.’ Now who can rob ‘who is’ and ‘who was’ of eternity? This too in confutation of the Jews hath Paul written in his Epistle to the Romans, ‘Of whom as concerning the flesh is Christ, who is over all, God blessed for ever1885;’ while silencing the Greeks, he has said, ‘The visible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal Power and Godhead1886;’ and what the Power of God is, he teaches us elsewhere himself, ‘Christ the Power of God and the Wisdom of God1887.’ Surely in these words he does not designate the Father, as ye often whisper one to another, affirming that the Father is ‘His eternal power.’ This is not so; for he says not, ‘God Himself is the power,’ but ‘His is the power.’ Very plain is it to all that ‘His’ is not ‘He;’ yet not something alien but rather proper to Him. Study too the context and ‘turn to the Lord;’ now ‘the Lord is that Spirit1888;’and you will see that it is the Son who is signified.

1881    Athan. observes that this formula of the Arians is a mere evasion to escape using the word ‘time.’ vid. also Cyril. Thesaur. iv. pp. 19, 20. Else let them explain,—‘There was,’ what ‘when the Son was not?’ or what was before the Son? since He Himself was before all times and ages, which He created, de Decr. 18, note 5. Thus, if ‘when’ be a word of time, He it is who was ‘when’ He was not, which is absurd. Did they mean, however, that it was the Father who ‘was’ before the Son? This was true, if ‘before’ was taken, not to imply time, but origination or beginning. And in this sense the first verse of S. John’s Gospel may be interpreted ‘In the Beginning,’ or Origin, i.e. in the Father ‘was the Word.’ Thus Athan. himself understands that text, Orat. iv. §1. vid. also Orat. iii. §9; Nyssen. contr. Eunom. iii. p. 106; Cyril. Thesaur. 32. p. 312.

1882    Ps. ii. 1.

1883    John i. 1.

1884    Rev. i. 4. τάδε λέγει. [On λέγει, &c., in citations, see Lightf. on Gal. iii. 16, Winer, Gram. §58, 9 γ, Grimm-Thayer, s.v. II. 1. e.]

1885    Rom. ix. 5.

1886    Ib. i. 20.

1887    1 Cor. i. 24. Athan. has so interpreted this text supr. de Decr. 15. It was either a received interpretation, or had been adduced at Nicæa, for Asterius had some years before these Discourses replied to it, vid. de Syn. 18, and Orat. ii. §37.

1888    2 Cor. iii. 16, 17. S. Athanasius observes, Serap. i. 4–7, that the Holy Ghost is never in Scripture called simply ‘Spirit’ without the addition ‘of God’ or ‘of the Father’ or ‘from Me’ or of the article, or of ‘Holy,’ or ‘Comforter,’ or ‘of truth,’ or unless He has been spoken of just before. Accordingly this text is understood of the third Person in the Holy Trinity by Origen, contr. Cels. vi. 70; Basil de Sp. S. n. 32; Pseudo-Athan. de comm. ess. 6. On the other hand, the word πνεῦμα, ‘Spirit, is used more or less distinctly for our Lord’s Divine Nature whether in itself or as incarnate, in Rom. i. 4, 1 Cor. xv. 45, 1 Tim. iii. 16, Hebr. ix. 14, 1 Pet. iii. 18, John vi. 63, &c. [But cf. also Milligan Resurr. 238 sq.] Indeed the early Fathers speak as if the ‘Holy Spirit,’ which came down upon S. Mary might be considered the Word. E.g. Tertullian against the Valentinians, ‘If the Spirit of God did not descend into the womb “to partake in flesh from the womb,” why did He descend at all?’ de Carn. Chr. 19. vid. also ibid. 5 and 14. contr. Prax. 26, Just. Apol. i. 33. Iren. Hær. v. 1. Cypr. Idol Van. 6. Lactant. Instit. iv. 12. vid. also Hilar. Trin. ii. 27; Athan. λόγος ἐν τῷ πνεύματι ἔπλαττε τὸ σῶμα. Serap. i. 31 fin. ἐν τῷ λόγῳ ἦν τὸ πνεῦμα ibid. iii. 6. And more distinctly even as late as S. Maximus, αὐτὸν ἀντὶ σπορᾶς συλλαβοῦσα τὸν λόγον, κεκύηκε, t. 2. p. 309. The earliest ecclesiastical authorities are S. Ignatius ad Smyrn. init. and S. Hermas (even though his date were a.d. 150), who also says plainly: Filius autem Spiritus Sanctus est. Sim. v. 5, 2, cf. ix. 1. The same use of ‘Spirit’ for the Word or Godhead of the Word, is also found in Tatian. adv. Græc. 7. Athenag. Leg. 10. Theoph. ad Autol. ii. 10. Iren. Hær. iv. 36. Tertull. Apol. 23. Lact. Inst. iv. 6, 8. Hilar. Trin. ix. 3, and 14. Eustath. apud Theod. Eran. iii. p. 235. Athan. contr. Apoll. i. 8. Apollinar. ap. Theod. Eran. i. p. 71, and the Apollinarists passim. Greg. Naz. Ep. 101. ad Cledon. p. 85. Ambros. Incarn. 63. Severian. ap. Theod. Eran. ii. p. 167. Vid. Grot. ad Marc. ii. 8; Bull, Def. F. N. i. 2, §5; Coustant. Præf. in Hilar. 57, &c. Montfaucon in Athan. Serap. iv. 19. [see also Tertullian, de Orat. init.]

=============================

Cassiodorus (Fathers of the Church, Vol. 144, Cassiodorus, St. Gregory the Great, and Anonymous Greek Scholia, Writings on the Apocalypse) (Chapter 1, section 2. [4], pp. 16-17), Francis X. Gumerlock, trans.

John, to the seven churches which are in Asia, grace to you and peace, etc. The apostle John says that he is writing to the seven churches which have been established in Asia. He greets them, and wishes them peace and for grace to come from Christ the Lord and from the seven angels who, as is read, stand before the throne of the Lord, as in the book of Tobit where the angel Raphael said: "I am one of the seven angels who stand before the throne of the glory of God." But who this Lord is, "who is, who was, and who is to come," he makes known through an obvious statement, testifying that he is Christ the Lord, who redeemed us with his precious blood. He also tells us how he will come in his Second Advent and how he will be seen by people in his glorious power. For he is "the first and the last" and the Almighty, which he also established with that statement about his divinity.

=============================

Anonymous 6th Century Scholiast, Scholia 4, pp. 108-109 T.C. Schmidt, Trans. (proposed to be drawn from a fourth-century or later theologian based on the title, "John the Theologian" despite some very similar statements in Origen's On Prayer 27.13, see fns. 6 and 8, at p. 109)

Revelation 1.4b-7: He who is and who was and who is coming, and from the seven spirits that are before his throne, (5) and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, firstborn from the dead and rule of the kings of the earth. To him who loved us and washed us from our sins in his blood, (6) and made us a royal priesthood to or God and his Father; glory and honour be to him forever and ever. Amen (7) Behold he comes with the clouds, and every eye and those who pierced him shall see him, and all the tribes of the earth shall mourn him. Yes, Amen.

The Word embraces three tenses. John the Theologian, who perceives this, here says that the Savior is He who is and who was and who is coming. The [phrase] "who is" brings forward the present; the [phrase] "who was" [brings forward] what has passed; and the [phrase] "who is coming" [brings forward] the future. Having understood such things concerning the Word, the apostle, perceiving him to be Christ, says, "Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever." Now, "yesterday" brings forward what has passed; "today" [brings forward] what is present; and "forever" [brings forever] the future.

Alternative translation by P. Tzamalikos in An Ancient Commentary on the Book of Revelation, a Critical Edition of the Scholia in Apocalypsin (p. 103). Tzamalikos ascribes this collection to Cassabian the Sabaite a previously unknown 6th century monk.

The Logos has encompassed the three parts of time. Being aware of this, John the Theologian says at this point that the Savior is He who is, and who was, and who is to come. He applies the [expression] who is, to the present time, the who was, to the past, the who is to come, to the future. Having thus comprehended the teaching about the Logos, and recognizing Him as Christ himself, the Apostle says, Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and today, and forever, applying the [term] yesterday to past time, the [term] today to current time and the [term] forever to the future.

=============================

Ps-Jerome (Continental Irish author late 7th century), in Early Latin Commentaries on the Apocalypse, Francis X. Gumerlock, ed. and trans., p. 22, at Rev. 1:5

Who is, who always is. Who was, [who] in the present is in the flesh. Who is to come, that is, for the judgment.

=============================

Theodulf of Orleans, Exposition on the Apocalypse of John (A.D. 810), Chapter 1, as provided in Carolingian Commentaries on the Apocalypse by Theodulf and Smaragdus, Francis X. Gumerlock, trans. at p. 33

Who is, who always is. Who was, [who] in the present is in the flesh. Who is to come for the judgment.[EN9]

Endnote at p. 64:

EN9 Pseudo-Jerome, Handbook on the Apocalypse of the Apostle John, on Rev 1:4, CCSL 107:196.

=============================

Smaragdus of Saint-Mihiel, Homilies on the Apocalypse of John (A.D. 812), Homily on the Eighth Sunday after Pentecost (at Revelation 4:8), as provided in Carolingian Commentaries on the Apocalypse by Theodulf and Smaragdus, Francis X. Gumerlock, trans. at p. 83

Who was, who is, and who is to come. "Who was", as in that passage: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God and God was the Word (John 1:1). "Who is", as in the passage: Say to the children of Israel: The One who is has sent me to you (Ex 3:14). "Who is to come" is understood as [he is coming] to judge the living and the dead (1 Pet 4:5).

=============================

Nicholas of Lyra, The Postilla of Nicholas of Lyra on the Apocalypse of St. John, the Apostle (A.D. 1329), Chapter 1, the Preface, at Rev. 1:4, in Nicholas of Lyra's Apocalypse Commentary, Philip D.W. Krey trans., p. 33

From him who is That is, from the eternal God. According to Boethius in the Consolation of Philosophy, "Eternity is endless life possessed all at once in its totality and its perfection." Nevertheless, his simplicity is not apprehended by us except by a comparison to time. For he assists at every time, even infinitely as it were; therefore, this is expressed to us through the distinctions of present, past, and future time.

Nicholas of Lyra, The Postilla of Nicholas of Lyra on the Apocalypse of St. John, the Apostle (A.D. 1329), Chapter 4, the Treatise, at Rev. 4:8, in Nicholas of Lyra's Apocalypse Commentary, Philip D.W. Krey trans., p. 71

"Who was and is and is to come." This expresses the eternity of God, which we do not apprehend along the way unless by comparison to distinctions in time, as was said in chapter 1.

=============================

Primasius of Hadrumetum (540) (my own source)

Book I, Chapter I, at Rev. 1:4

Grace to you and peace from God, who is, who was, and who is to come, the Almighty. Even though according to the apostle "God was in Christ, reconciling the world to himself," or as He Himself testifies "He who sent me is with me," due to the unity of one and the same nature: However, this passage should properly be attributed to the person of the Son. For He 'is', because He remains the same; He 'was', because with the Father He created all things, He did not begin with [being born of] the Virgin; He 'is to come' to judge.

And from the seven spirits who are before the throne of God. Due to the sevenfold operation of the Holy Spirit, it is called the sevenfold spirit, that is, of wisdom and understanding, of counsel and might, of knowledge and piety, and of the fear of God. For the gifts of the one Spirit are legally commended when peace and grace are devoutly wished from the seven spirits.

Book I, Chapter IV, at Revelation 4:8

And they were full of eyes in front and behind, or as another translation says, "inside and out:" Inside because the light of the gospel is hidden from the unworthy. "For if our gospel is veiled," he says, "it is veiled to those who are perishing." Alternatively, "in front and behind" means that wherever the fruit-bearing Church spreads, it walks in the light of God's face, and with unveiled face beholds the glory of God. Another interpretation of "in front and behind" [is that the group of] the six wings, which total twenty-four, hints at the books of the Old Testament. We accept by canonical authority twenty-four books, just as there are twenty-four elders sitting in judgment. The reason the preaching of the New Testament is fruitful is because it is strengthened and confirmed by the testimonies of the Old. The Church holds this "in front and behind," that is, both then under the law and now under grace.

'They who have no rest day or night, saying: 'Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, who was and is and is to come.'" When the Church, spread all around in individual members, diverse professions, cities, regions, provinces, various languages and nations, ceaselessly praises God in word and deed, in adversity and prosperity, it does not stop praising the Lord day and night. The eternal praise of intellectual creatures continues in the heavens above Jerusalem, to whose likeness the wandering Church delights to conform.

Book III, Chapter XI, at Revelation 11:17 and following through the end of Revelation 12

And the seventh angel sounded his trumpet, and there were loud voices in heaven, saying, "The kingdom of our God and of his Christ has come, and he will reign forever and ever." And the twenty-four elders who sit before God on their thrones fell on their faces and worshiped God, saying, "We give thanks to you, Lord God Almighty, who are and were, because you have taken your great power and have begun to reign. The nations raged, but your wrath came, and the time for the dead to be judged, to reward your servants the prophets and those who fear your name, both small and great, and to destroy those who destroy the earth." Concerning the elders, enough and more has been said about what should be understood. But it now mentions the beginning and end of Christ's dispensation; for by saying "you have begun to reign and the nations were angry" it first demonstrates Christ's coming. However, what follows, "your wrath has come and the time of the dead," or as another translation has it "that the dead may be judged," shows the second coming, when both the small and great, perfect and little ones, saints and prophets and those fearing his name, will receive their reward. "For my eyes," he says, "have seen my imperfect [works], and in your book they will all be written." And lest the wicked should promise themselves impunity, he added, "and to destroy those who have corrupted the earth," just as the Psalm says: "But the face of the Lord is against those who do evil." "Behold," he says, "the third woe is coming at the voice of the seventh angel," and when he had sounded, he spoke only of the church praising the Lord and giving thanks, from which we understand that the reward of the good is not without the woe of the wicked. Hence the Psalm: "When his wrath flares up in an instant," surely against the wicked, "blessed are all who trust in him." So now the church itself says: "Your wrath has come, and the time of the dead, to give to your servants their reward" and so on; this is the last woe. Indeed, having summarized the Lord's physical birth, it hints that he will speak about the same thing differently and in a more extended manner.

Book IV, Chapter XVI, at Revelation 16:5

"And I heard," he says, "the angels of the waters saying: 'You are just, O Lord, the One who is and who was.'” The angels of the waters are heralds of the peoples, resounding from their innermost feelings with divine praises.

"And you are holy because you have judged in this way: For they have shed the blood of saints and prophets, and you have given them blood to drink, for they are deserving." While both the Jews and the Gentiles have physically shed the blood of the saints, which the Lord mentions as requiring recompense, saying, "from the blood of Abel to the blood of Zechariah", this could also refer to the blindness of misinterpretation. This means that those who misuse the prophecies and twist their meanings are also seen as shedding the blood of the prophets. It's like saying that those who interpret spiritual law in a carnal way are justly handed over to the corruptions of the flesh and blood, where both the sins and the punishments for sins are recognized. Hence, the apostle says: "Because they did not receive the love of truth so as to be saved, God will send them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie, and they will all be judged who did not believe the truth but took pleasure in wickedness."

=============================

Apringius of Beja (548), Explanation of Revelation, at Revelation 1:4, William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Latin Commentaries on Revelation

Grace to you and peace from him who is and who was and who is to come. As he declared his own name at the beginning of the writing, where he said, "John to the seven churches which are in Asia," so in a similitude of words he confirms most evidently that he is John by saying "who is, who was, and who is to come." For in God there is always being. Therefore it was said to Moses, "I am who am," and the apostle himself says in the Gospel, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God; he was in the beginning with God." By this he indicates that the Word exceeds every beginning because he was in the beginning, nor does he have a beginning because he was with God, nor will he receive an end because he was God. Rather he will remain forever because he was in the beginning with God, and he indicates that it is this one who is to come.

Apringius of Beja (548), Explanation of Revelation, at Revelation 1:8, William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Latin Commentaries on Revelation

And since the substance of his humanity has been made plain, he announces the glory of his divine substance and speaks the words of the Lord himself, saying, "I am Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End," says the Lord God, who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.

...

And so, in all things he might be what he always is, as the present scripture says: "The Lord God says, who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty."

=============================

Bede (d. 735), The Exposition of the Apocalypse, at Revelation 1:4, William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Latin Commentaries on Revelation

Grace be to you and peace from him who is and who was and who is to come and from the seven spirits, and the following, He wishes for the faithful grace and peace from God, the eternal Father, and from the seven-formed Spirit.

=============================

Bede (d. 735), The Exposition of the Apocalypse, at Revelation 1:5, William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Latin Commentaries on Revelation

And from Jesus Christ. Grace and peace is also from Jesus Christ, who in his assumed human nature gave witness to the Father. He names the Son in the third place, since most of what he has to say in the following revelation was concerning him. He also names him last, because he is the first and the last. Moreover, he had already named him in the Father when he said, "who is going to come."

=============================

Bede (d. 735), The Exposition of the Apocalypse, at Revelation 1:8, William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Latin Commentaries on Revelation

Who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty, He had said this same thing concerning the Father, for God the Father has come and will come in the Son. 

=============================

Bede (d. 735), The Exposition of the Apocalypse, at Revelation 7:3, William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Latin Commentaries on Revelation

"Until we have sealed the servants of our God on their foreheads." For this purpose was the rule of the nations destroyed, that the face of the saints might in freedom be marked by the sign of faith that the nations had received. For even the figure of the cross indicates that the kingdom of the Lord is everywhere extended, as the ancient distich shows:

Behold, the four-squared world, in distinct parts,
that you show you might show the sign of faith to encompass all things.

Nor in vain was the four-lettered name of the Lord written on the forehead of the high priest, since this is the sign on the foreheads of the faithful, about which the psalm "for the wine vats" sings: "O Lord, our Lord, how majestic is your name in all the earth," and so on, until he says, "that you may destroy the enemy and the defender."  

=============================

Bede (d. 735), The Exposition of the Apocalypse, at Revelation 16:5, William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Latin Commentaries on Revelation

And I heard the angel of the waters say, "Just you are, who is and was, the Holy One, for you have judged these things." By the angel of the waters he refers to all the messengers of the peoples who by an inner affection raise up in unison a cry of praise to God, for he will avenge the blood of his servants by giving their murderers death to drink.

=============================

William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Greek Commentaries on Revelation, at the Translator's Introduction regarding Andrew of Caesarea (p. xxxiv):

The phrase "who is, who was and who is to come" refers to the "tri-hypostatic deity" (τῆς τρισυποστάτου θεότητος) of Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

=============================

Oecumenius (6th or 7th century), Commentary on the Apocalypse, at Revelation 1:4, William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Greek Commentaries on Revelation

[1:4] John to the seven churches that are in Asia: Grace to you and peace from God, who is and who was and who is coming.

This is the same as saying, "Grace to you from the God of us all." For the Father calls himself "he who is," making known this name to the most wise Moses from the bush, saying, "I am who am." And our holy Evangelist uses "who was" to speak concerning the Son, saying, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." Moreover, in the first of the Catholic Letters he writes, "What was from the beginning, what we have heard, what we have seen with our own eyes, what we have beheld and our hands have touched concerning the Word of life." The phrase "who is coming" refers to the Holy Spirit, for not only did he come on the day of Pentecost as that is narrated in the Acts, but he also comes always to those souls worthy to receive him.

Alternative translation from the Fathers of the Church, vol. 112, John N. Suggit trans. (p. 23)

6. He says, John to the seven churches that are in Asia: Grace to you and peace from God, who is and who was and who is coming (Rv 1.4)
7. This is the same as saying, "Grace to you from the God of most wise Moses at the bush, saying, "I am who I am," (2) and the present blessed evangelist said "he was" about the Son, saying, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God," and again in the first of the general epistles, "That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we looked upon and which our hands touched, concerning the Word of life." (3) And by the one who is coming he means the Holy Spirit. For not only was the Spirit present on the day of Pentecost, according to the narrative in Acts, but he is always present, too, to the souls worthy of receiving him.

=============================

Oecumenius (6th or 7th century), Commentary on the Apocalypse, at Revelation 1:5, William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Greek Commentaries on Revelation

[1:5] And from Jesus Christ, the witness, the faithful one, the firstborn of the dead and the ruler of the kings of the earth.

Having previously written of the preincarnate Word of God and referring to him as "he who was," he now speaks concerning the incarnated Word, saying, "and from Jesus Christ." By speaking in this manner he does not divide Christ into two, but he testifies by the one statement and the other that he who is the Word of the Father is also he who has become flesh.

Alternative translation from the Fathers of the Church, vol. 112, John N. Suggit trans. (p. 24)

10. And from Jesus Christ, he says, to the faithful witness, the first-born of the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth (Rv 1.5)
11. Earlier he had written about the pre-incarnate Word of God, describing him as he who was; now he speaks about him as incarnate, saying, and from Jesus Christ. He does not separate him into two, but witnesses to both aspects of him at once, both that he is the Word of the Father and that he was made flesh.

=============================

Oecumenius (6th or 7th century), Commentary on the Apocalypse, at Revelation 1:8, William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Greek Commentaries on Revelation

[1:8] "I am the Alpha and the Omega," says the Lord God, who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty, and the Lord of creation.

"Alpha" indicates the beginning: "omega" indicates the end. Therefore, he is saying, "I am the first and the last," showing through "first" that God is without beginning and showing through "last" that God is without end. Since nothing exists among people that is without beginning or without end, he uses the terms "first" and "last," which are common among us, rather than "without beginning" and "without end." God also speaks through Isaiah saying, "I, God, the first, and to that which is yet to come, I am." He calls God "Almighty" and "Lord of the creation," not only of that which is sensible but also of that which is intellectual.

Alternative translation from the Fathers of the Church, vol. 112, John N. Suggit trans. (p. 27)

16. I am Alpha and Omega, says the Lord God, who is and who was and who is coming, the sovereign Lord, and Lord of creation (Rv 1.8)
17. Alpha means the beginning, and Omega the end. Therefore he says, I am the first and the last (Rv 1.17), declaring by the first that God has no beginning, and by the last that he has no end. For since with human beings there is nothing that is without beginning and end, he used what is for us the beginning and the end, instead of saying, "without beginning and without end." This is also what God said through Isaiah: "I, God, am the first, and I shall be for the ages to come." (2) He calls God sovereign Lord, and Lord of creation, of spiritual as well as perceptible creation.

=============================

Oecumenius (6th or 7th century), Commentary on the Apocalypse, at Revelation 11:15-19, William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Greek Commentaries on Revelation

[11:15-19] And the seventh angel blew his trumpet, and there were loud voices in heaven, saying, "The kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ, and he shall reign forever and ever." And the twenty-four elders who sit on their thrones before God fell on their faces and worshiped God, saying, "We give thanks to you, Lord God, the Almighty, who is and who was, that you have taken your great power and begun to reign. The nations raged, but your wrath came, and the time for the nations to be judged, for rewarding your servants, the prophets and saints, and those who fear your name, both small and great, and for destroying the destroyers of earth." And the temple of God in heaven was opened, and the ark of the covenant was seen within his temple; and there were flashes of lightning, voices, and thunder, an earthquake and heavy hail.

... 

When the voice was heard, "the elders worshiped God," bringing their own thanksgiving and saying, "We give you thanks, O Lord God, the Almighty, who is and who was." The phrases "who is" and "who was" are fitting to be used of the holy Trinity, although usually "who is" is used of the Father and "who was" is used of the Son. For "to be" is true of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.  Therefore, the thanksgiving of the elders is ascribed to the holy Trinity.

Alternative translation from the Fathers of the Church, vol. 112, John N. Suggit trans. (pp. 104-6)

16. Then the seventh angel blew his trumpet, and there were loud voices in heaven, saying, "The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord and his Christ, and he shall reign for ever and ever." (2) And the twenty-four elders who sat on their thrones before God fell on their faces and worshiped God, saying, (3) "We give thanks to you, Lord God, sovereign of all, who are and who were, because you have taken your great power and have entered on your reign. (4) The nations raged, but your wrath has come, and the time for the nations to be judged, and to reward your servants, the prophets and the saints, and those who fear your name, both small and great, and to destroy the destroyers of the earth." (5) Then God's temple in heaven was opened, and the ark of his covenant was seen within his temple; and there were flashes of lightning, noises, peals of thunder, and earthquake, and heavy hail (Rv 11.15-19).
17. ... (3) When the voice had sounded, he says, the elders worshiped God, and they themselves rendered their own thanksgiving, saying, "We give you thanks to you, Lord God, sovereign of all, who are and who were." And he takes You who are to refer to the Holy Trinity, as well as You who were, even though You who are is especially said about the Father, and You who were about the Son; for being (You who are) refers to the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. And we rightly say "You who were" of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. So the thanksgiving of the elders is offered up to the Holy Trinity.

=============================

Oecumenius (6th or 7th century), Commentary on the Apocalypse, at Revelation 16:2-7, William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Greek Commentaries on Revelation

[16:2-7] And the first angel went and poured his bowl on the earth, and a foul and evil sore came on people who bore the mark of the beast and who worshiped his image. And the second angel poured out his bowl on the sea, and it became like the blood of a dead person, and every living soul died. And the third angel poured out his bowl into the rivers and the fountains of water, and they became blood. And I heard the angel of the waters say, "Righteous are you who is and who was and the holy One, in these your judgments, for they have shed the blood of saints and prophets, and you have given them blood to drink, for it is their due." And I heard the altar say, "Yea, Lord, God Almighty, true and just are your judgments!"

... 

Most certainly it is this angel who is placed by the providence of God over the waters whom, he says, "I heard saying, 'Righteous are you, who is and who was, the holy One'." The phrase "who is" shows the endlessness of God, and "who was" that he is without beginning. The "holy One" refers to the fact that he is righteous in all things on behalf of all things. For it says, "You have judged these things" so that those who have spilled the blood of the saints might drink blood. And it is necessary that those who encamped and fought by streams and rivers drink the water polluted by the blood of the dying being carried away downstream.

Alternative translation from the Fathers of the Church, vol. 112, John N. Suggit trans. (pp. 137-39)

24. The first angel went off and poured out his bowl on the earth, and foul and evil sores came upon those who bore the mark of the beast and worshiped its image. (2) Then the second angel poured out his howl over the sea, and it became blood like that of a corpse, and every living thing died. (3) The third angel poured out his bowl into the rivers and the fountains of water, and they became blood. (4) And I heard the angel of the waters say, "Just are you, you who are and who were, the Holy One, because of your judgments, (5) for they shed the blood of saints and prophets, and you gave them blood to drink, for they are worthy." (6) And I heard the altar say, "Yes, Lord God, sovereign of all, true and just are your judgments!" (Rv 16.2-7).
25. ... (7) It is of this angel appointed by God's providence over the waters, that he says, I heard him say, "You are just, you who are and who were, the Holy One." "You who are" signifies that God has no end; "you who were" signifies that God has no beginning: "the Holy One" is he who is altogether just in all things. (8) When he says, because of your judgments, he means that those who poured out the blood of the saints should drink blood. For those in war who are encamped by the side of the waters and rivers cannot but drink the water that has been befouled by blood from the bodies of the dying.

=============================

Andrew of Caesarea (aka Andreas of Caesarea) (d. 614), Commentary on the Apocalypse, at Revelation 1:4, William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Greek Commentaries on Revelation

[1:4] John to the seven churches that are in Asia: Grace to you and peace from who is and who was and who is to come, and from the seven spirits who are before his throne.

Through the phrase "who is" the Father is indicated, who spoke to Moses: "I am who I am." Through the phrase "who was" the Word is indicated, who "was in the beginning with God." And through the phrase "who is to come" the Paraclete is indicated, who always visits the children of the church in holy baptism but will come more perfectly and more clearly in the age to come. It is possible to recognize in the seven spirits the seven angels who have received the governance of the churches. These are not numbered with the most divine and royal Trinity but are mentioned together with it as servants, even as the divine apostle says: "I testify to you before God and the elect angels."  These phrases may be understand also in another manner. The phrase "who is and who was and who is to come" may signify the Father who encompasses in himself the beginning, the middle and the end of all things. "The seven spirits" may indicate the energies of the life-giving Spirit. Then follows Christ, our God, who for us became man. For in many places each of the divine persons are quite indiscriminately ordered, now before and now after.

=============================

Andrew of Caesarea (aka Andreas of Caesarea) (d. 614), Commentary on the Apocalypse, at Revelation 1:5, William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Greek Commentaries on Revelation

According to the blessed Gregory [See Gregory of Nazianzus Or. 29.12; 34.13 (NPNF 2 7:305,337], the phrase "who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty" refers to Christ. Nor is there anything strange when words similar to these are spoken a little later and there refer to Christ, and to these also the phrase "the Almighty" is attached without thereby any other person being mentioned for the first time or by way of repetition. The introduction in this verse of the phrase "and from Jesus Christ" seems to lend support to the interpretation offered by us. For it would be superfluous to add immediately the words "and from Jesus Christ" to a discussion concerning the divine Word and the person of the Son alone, as though the one seemed to be distinct from the other. Terms and phrases that befit God may refer equally to each divine person, to that which is common to the three, but not to the personal properties, or relations, as Gregory the Theologian says, or to the incarnation of the Word. From these considerations it is clear why we learn in the Gospel that the thrice-holy hymn of the seraphim is spoken to the Son, while we learn in the speech of Paul in Acts that is addressed to the Holy Spirit, and while int he offering of the awesome mysteries we address it to the Father, to whom we are wont to make such a prayer, as also the blessed Epiphanius says in his book On the Holy Spirit [TF: a footnote by the translator or editor here indicates that this work of Epiphanius appears to be lost]. We have made these comments to demonstrate that our interpretation is not opposed to the testimonies of the Fathers. With God's help we attend as closely as possible to the sequence of the text.

=============================

Andrew of Caesarea (aka Andreas of Caesarea) (d. 614), Commentary on the Apocalypse, at Revelation 1:8, William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Greek Commentaries on Revelation

[1:8] I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, says the Lord God, who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.

Here Christ is shown to be God who rules all things, who is without beginning and similarly without end, who is and who was before and who is without limit, since he is eternal with the Father. For this reason he gives to each the wages of their deeds.

=============================

Andrew of Caesarea (aka Andreas of Caesarea) (d. 614), Commentary on the Apocalypse, at Revelation 4:8, William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Greek Commentaries on Revelation

[4:8] And they have no rest by day or night, saying, "Holy, holy, holy, is the Lord God Almighty, who was and is and is to come!"

There is no rest for these holy powers, for they never cease from their divine hymnody but proffer the threefold acclamation of holiness to the tri-hypostatic deity. For we have said that the phrase "who was and is and is to come" indicates the holy Trinity.

=============================

Andrew of Caesarea (aka Andreas of Caesarea) (d. 614), Commentary on the Apocalypse, at Revelation 11:15-18, William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Greek Commentaries on Revelation

[11:15-18] Then the seventh angel blew his trumpet, and there were loud voices in heaven, saying "The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ, and she shall reign forever and ever." And the twenty-four elders who sit on their thrones before God fell on their faces and worshiped God, saying, "We give thanks to you, O Lord God Almighty, who is and who was, for you have taken your great power and begun to reign. The nations raged, but your wrath came and the time of the dead."

Here again he says that the holy angels and those who live as do the angels send a hymn of thanksgiving to God, because for our sake he has become worthy to receive as man that kingdom that as God he possessed from the beginning. And having been patient with the unbelieving nations who were enraged at this as though it were a new and strange teaching, at the end he brings judgment on them.

=============================

Andrew of Caesarea (aka Andreas of Caesarea) (d. 614), Commentary on the Apocalypse, at Revelation 16:4-6, William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Greek Commentaries on Revelation

[16:4-6] The third angel poured his bowl into the rivers and the fountains of water, and they became blood. And I heard the angel of the waters say, "Just are you in these judgments, who is and who was, the Holy One. For they have shed the blood of saints and prophets, and you have given them blood to drink. It is their due!"

As it was said above, here also it shows that the angels are placed over the elements.


=============================

At least one thesis has studied the text of Revelation used by Didymus of Alexandria (see here).  The only passage relevant to this particular post is:  

There was also an interesting textual critical comment about the Byzantine text time.  I note that Erasmus used the Andreas commentary text for his printed edition.


The reference to "ZA.COM" is a reference to "Zechariah commentary I"

Didymus the Blind (d. 398), Commentary on Zechariah 2, at vss. 8-9, pp. 59-60 of Fathers of the Church, vol. 111, Robert C. Hill trans.

It is not surprising that the almighty is from the almighty: he is also God from God and light from light, being consubstantial with the one who begot him and one with him who begot him, as the verse says, "I and the Father are one," and so all the Father has belongs to the Son. Now, what the Father has is being God, being light, being holy, being almighty, all of which belongs to the Son. The Son is thus almighty from the almighty, being king of all from the one who reigns over all. In John's Apocalypse the savior is undeniably confessed to be almighty, personally saying of himself, "This is what the faithful witness says, the ἀρχή of God's creation, the one who is and who was and who is coming, Lord God almighty."[FN33 Rv 1.5, 8; 3.14. The ambiguity of a term like ἀρχή, offering both "beginning" and "rule" as meanings, made such texts grist to the mill of both orthodox and heterodox in Christological debate, as well as some texts from Colossians and John. Theodore avoids this by not bringing Jesus into focus, simply confining himself to "the events themselves"-- πράγματα in preference to ὀνόματά, as Eustathius had reminded Origen's followers (KIT 83.16).] The one saying this is almighty, and is no creature such as does not have power over itself; it would be absurd, in fact, for the same person to be creator and created by itself, both ruler and subject. Even if the one we confess as God is called in the passage cited "ἀρχή of God's creation," he is called "ἀρχή of creation" because of his ruling as king and being almighty, which is the same thing -- in other words, his kingship controls and governs all creatures.

=============================

Tyconius of Carthage (fl. 380), Exposition on the Apocalypse, at Rev. 4:8, p. 66 of Fathers of the Church, vol. 134, Francis X. Gumerlock trans.  (Tyconius comments on Rev. 1:4 and 1:8 are currently lost.)

And they have no rest day or night, saying: Holy, holy, holy is the Lord God Almighty, who was and who is and who is to come. The church does not have rest, but praises God always, in [both] prosperity and adversity.

=============================

Tyconius of Carthage (fl. 380), Exposition on the Apocalypse, at Rev. 11:17, p. 119 of Fathers of the Church, vol. 134, Francis X. Gumerlock trans.  (There does not seem to be any commentary by Tyconius on the words of the verse, though the verse itself is present - it's unclear to me whether the verse is supplied by the translator, so I would be cautious about resting any weight on the reading.)

[17] saying: We give thanks to you, Lord God almighty, who is and who was and who is to come, because you have received your great power and you have reigned.

=============================

Tyconius of Carthage (fl. 380), Exposition on the Apocalypse, at Rev. 16:5, p. 150 of Fathers of the Church, vol. 134, Francis X. Gumerlock trans.  (There does not seem to be any commentary by Tyconius on the words of the verse, though the verse itself is present - it's unclear to me whether the verse is supplied by the translator, so I would be cautious about resting any weight on the reading.)

[5] And I heard the angel of the waters saying: You are just, you who were and will be, the Holy One, because you have judged these things.

=============================
Caesarius of Arles (d. 542), Exposition on the Apocalypse, William C. Weinrich trans. in Ancient Christian Texts, Greek Commentaries on Revelation is composed of homilies.  Caesarius hits on the major themes of the text, but does not address the "who was and who is," etc. readings.


Location of some of the relevant sources was based on the linked article.