Showing posts with label Translation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Translation. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 23, 2026

Peter of Laodicea on the Lord's Prayer

Peter of Laodicea (7th or 8th century?) created a commentary on Matthew that, as far as I have been able to determine, has been published only in Greek (link to 1905 publication, or at least, not in English).  As I'm compiling patristic commentaries on the Lord's Prayer, I was pointed to this work. I now offer my amateur attempt at a transcription and translation of his commentary on Matthew 6:9-13. 

Τότε πατὴρ ἡμῶν ὁ θεὸς χρηματίζει, ὅτε διὰ τῆς τοῦ πνεύματος ἐπιφοιτήσεως τῆς υἱοθεσίας Χριστοῦ ἀξιωθῶμεν. ὁ γὰρ πατέρα καλῶν τὸν θεὸν ὀφείλει καθαρὸς εἶναι ἀπὸ ἁμαρτιῶν καὶ κληρονόμος τῆς βασιλείας τῶν οὐρανῶν· θρασὺς δὲ ὁ μορφωθεὶς πρὸς τὸν διάβολον, λέγων πατέρα τὸν θεὸν, ὃν οὐ δοξάζει. εἰπὼν δὲ τὸ ἡμῶν ἕνα τοὺς πολλοὺς δείκνυσιν ὡς ἑνὸς σώματος, μιᾶς ἁπάντων οὔσης κεφαλῆς τοῦ θεοῦ· ὑπεμφαίνει δὲ καὶ τὸ ὑπὲρ ἀλλήλων εὔχεσθαι ὡς ὅτι πάντες ἀδελφοί ἐσμεν. 

Then God is called our Father, when through the visitation of the Spirit we have been deemed worthy of the adoption of Christ. For the one calling God Father ought to be clean from sins and an heir of the kingdom of the heavens; but bold is the one who has been formed toward the devil, saying that God is Father, whom he does not glorify. And by saying the “our,” he shows the many to be one, as of one body, God being the one head of all; and he also intimates the praying for one another, since we are all brothers.

τὸ δὲ ἐν τοῖς οὐρανοῖς ὅταν εἴπῃ, οὐκ ἐκεῖ τὸν θεὸν συγκλείων τοῦτό φησιν, ἀλλὰ τῆς γῆς ἀπάγων τὸν εὐχόμενον καὶ τοῖς ὑψηλοῖς προσηλῶν. τὸ δὲ ἁγιασθήτω οὐ προστακτικῶς, εὐκτικῶς δέ, οἷον ἁγιασθείη, οὐχ ἵνα ἐκ βεβήλου ἁγιασθῇ, ἀλλ’ ἵνα ἡμῖν ἀποκαλυφθείσης τῆς ἀγαθότητος αὐτοῦ ἀξίως αὐτοῦ διδῶμεν ἁγιότητα ὀνομάζοντες θεόν. βασιλείαν δὲ θεοῦ ἢ τὴν μέλλουσαν τῶν ἀγαθῶν ἀπόλαυσιν φησὶν ἢ τὴν διὰ τοῦ ἁγίου πνεύματος δωρεὰν ἢ τὴν δευτέραν αὐτοῦ παρουσίαν. ἐπειδὴ δὲ φύσει θεὸς ὢν ὁ Χριστὸς οἰκονομικῶς καλεῖται βασιλεὺς ὡς ἄνθρωπος, ἐπεύχονται οἱ πιστοὶ τοῦτο καὶ ἐπὶ τοὺς ἀπίστους ἐλθεῖν, ἵνα εἰς Χριστὸν πιστεύσαντες βασιλέα ἴδιον ἐπιγράφωνται αὐτόν. 

And whenever he says the “in the heavens,” he says this not as shutting God up there, but as leading away the one praying from the earth and nailing him to the things on high.

And the “let it be hallowed” is not imperatively, but optatively, as, “may it be hallowed”; not so that it may be hallowed from being profane, but so that, his goodness having been revealed to us, we may fittingly give holiness to him, naming him God.

And by “kingdom of God” he means either the future enjoyment of good things, or the gift through the Holy Spirit, or his second coming. And since Christ, being God by nature, is called King economically as man, the faithful pray also that this may come upon the unbelievers, so that, having believed in Christ, they may inscribe him as their own King.

τὸ δὲ γενηθήτω τὸ θέλημά σου τοῦτο δηλοῖ· ὥσπερ ἐν οὐρανῷ καθαρῶς καὶ ἀμέμπτως πάντες οἱ ἄγγελοι πολιτεύονται, οὕτω καὶ τοὺς ἀνθρώπους ἐν τῇ γῇ ποίησον. ἢ οὕτως· ὥσπερ οἱ ἄγγελοι ἐν οὐρανοῖς εἰσιν, οὕτω καὶ ἡμᾶς ἀξίωσον ἐν τῇ ἀναστάσει τοῦ πνευματικοῦ καὶ καθαροῦ σώματος. Ἐπιούσιον δὲ ἄρτον ἢ τὸν συνιστῶντα τὸ σῶμα ἡμῶν φησι, τουτέστι τὸν ἐφήμερον, ἤτοι τὸν ἐπιόντα καὶ προσδοκώμενον τοῦ πνεύματος ζωοποιὸν ἄρτον, τουτέστι τὸν μέλλοντα. ὠνοματοπεποίηται τοίνυν τὸ ἐπιούσιον ἢ παρὰ τὸ ἐπιέναι καὶ ἐπέρχεσθαι, ἢ τὸν μὴ τοῦ ἐνεστῶτος αἰῶνος οἰκεῖον, ἀλλὰ τὸν ἀποδοθησόμενον ἐν τῷ μέλλοντι τοῖς ἁγίοις δὸς ἡμῖν ἤδη· ἢ ἐπείπερ οὐσία κυρίως ἐστὶν ἡ ἑστῶσα καὶ βέβαιος, οἷα ἡ τῆς ψυχῆς ἡμῶν φύσις φοροῦσα τὸ κατ’ εἰκόνα τοῦ ἀοράτου θεοῦ, κατὰ τοῦτο λέγοιτ’ ἂν ὁ τῇ κυρίως οὐσίᾳ ὁμιλῶν ἄρτος, ἐπιούσιος θεὸς ὢν, λόγος, ζῶν ἄρτος. 

And the “Let your will be done” makes this clear: just as in heaven all the angels conduct themselves purely and blamelessly, so also make human beings on the earth [to do so].

Or thus: just as the angels are in the heavens, so also count us worthy, in the resurrection, of the spiritual and pure body.

And by “supersubstantial bread” he means either the bread that sustains our body, that is, the bread for the day; or else the coming and expected life-giving bread of the Spirit, that is, the future bread. Therefore the word “supersubstantial” has been named either from “to come on” and “to approach,” or [it means]: “Give us already the bread that is not proper to the present age, but that which is going to be given in the future to the saints.”

Or, since “substance” in the proper sense is that which stands firm and is sure, such as the nature of our soul, bearing that which is according to the image of the invisible God, according to this the bread that has dealings with the substance in the proper sense might be called “supersubstantial,” being God, Word, living bread.

εἶτα δυσωπῶν ὁ λόγος ἀμνησικακεῖν, συνειδότας ἑαυτοῖς ἁμαρτίας μετριάζειν διδάσκει τὸ τῶν ἴσων θέλειν τυχεῖν. φησὶ γάρ· καὶ ἄφες ἡμῖν τὰ ὀφειλήματα ἡμῶν. πᾶν δὲ ἁμάρτημα ὀφείλημά ἐστιν· εἰ γὰρ μὴ ἐνδύσηταί τις τὴν τῆς ἀμνησικακίας ἀρετήν, οὐ δύναται τυχεῖν ἀφέσεως. εἶτα διδάσκει μὴ παραιτεῖσθαι τοὺς ἀγῶνας, πλὴν μὴ ἐπιρρίπτειν ἑαυτούς· εἰ δὲ ἀνάγκη καλέσοι, δεῖ εὔχεσθαι τοῦ ῥυσθῆναι· ὁ γὰρ ἐν τῇ πάλη νικῶν καὶ μὴ ἐγκαταλειπόμενος οὐκ εἰσέρχεται εἰς πειρασμόν. πειρασμὸς γάρ ἐστιν ἡ ἧττα καὶ ἡ ἀπὸ τοῦ διαβόλου πλάνη· ὁ δὲ μὴ εἰσελθὼν εἰς δίκτυα πειρασμοῦ ἐρρύσθη ἀπὸ τοῦ πονηροῦ. πονηρὸς δέ ἐστιν ὁ διάβολος οὐ φύσει, ἀλλὰ προαιρέσει·οὐ γὰρ τῶν ἐκ φύσεως ἐστὶν ἡ πονηρία, ἀλλ’ ἐξ αὐτεξουσίου κακίας καὶ πονηρίας γίνεται· κατ’ ἐξοχὴν δὲ οὗτος καλεῖται διὰ τὴν ὑπερβολὴν τῆς κακίας. τὸ δὲ ὅτι σοῦ ἐστιν ἡ βασιλεία καὶ ἡ δύναμις ἐν τισιν οὐ κεῖται μέχρι τοῦ ἀμήν.

Then, the Word, importuning [us] to be without remembrance of wrongs, teaches those conscious to themselves of sins to be moderate, by wishing to obtain equal things. For he says: “And forgive us our debts.”

And every sin is a debt; for unless someone puts on the virtue of not remembering wrongs, he is not able to obtain forgiveness.

Then he teaches not to decline the contests, yet not to throw ourselves upon them; but if necessity should call, it is necessary to pray to be delivered. For the one conquering in the wrestling and not being abandoned does not enter into temptation. For temptation is defeat and the deception from the devil; but the one who has not entered into the nets of temptation has been delivered from the evil one.

And the devil is evil, not by nature, but by choice; for wickedness is not among the things from nature, but comes to be from self-chosen evil and wickedness. And he is called this preeminently because of the excess of his wickedness.

And the “For yours is the kingdom and the power” is not found in some [copies] as far as the “Amen.”

What is particularly interesting here is that Peter recognizes the division among the Greek copies, with some including a doxology and others not including it.  Peter opts not to comment on this portion, possibly suggesting that he does not think it is original.  However, since he does not say that it is not original, we can only be confident that he was aware that there was, at his time, a textual variant in the Greek copies on this particular point.

Monday, June 15, 2026

Work Dubiously Attributed to Isaac "the Jew" and the Three Heavenly Witnesses

Isaac Iudaeus (aka Isaac the Jew) was a Jew who converted to Christianity and flourished around the time of Pope Damasus (Damasus, bishop of Rome), specifically AD 384, according to the editor of the Corpus Christianorum Series Latina, who is identified as "A. Hoste," probably Dom Anselm Hoste (CCSL, Vol. 9, p. 333).  There is a tractate, known as "Fides Isatis ex Iudeao" or "Fide Isacis" (Faith of Isaac the Jew), which Hoste acknowledges to be genuine.  

On the other hand, there is a work sometimes ascribed to this same Isaac the Jew, known as the "Expositio Fidei Catholicae" (Exposition of the Catholic Faith), but which the Clavis Patrum Latinorum (n. 190) is reluctant to acknowledge as authentic and multiple scholars agree.  The work is preserved in a single 8th century manuscript.

The critically restored text in CCSL, vol. 9, is as follows:

(p. 347)
(p. 348)

Here's my transcription of the Latin text:

EXPOSITIO FIDEI CATHOLICAE

Credimus unum deum secundum scripturam esse credendum, non sicut Iudaei aut haeretici, solitarium, sed in mysterio trinitatis, id est patrem et filium et spiritum sanctum, tres personas, non tamen tres deos. 

Personas autem sic dicimus, ut non diuinitatem haeretico sensu membris, sicut hominem, conponamus, quia diuinitas quae est incorporalis tam inmensa est, tam inextimabilis, ut intra se omnia contineat, ipsa autem circumscribi non possit, sed ut patrem et filium et spiritum sanctum unum et indiuisum esse ita in diuinitate ac uirtute <credamus>, ut tres in personis, id est ut patrem credamus non esse filium, filium uero credamus non esse patrem, spiritum autem sanctum nec patrem esse nec filium; quia pater est ingenitus, filius uero sine initio genitus a patre est, spiritus autem santus processit a patre et accipit de filio, sicut euangelista testatur, quia scriptum est: Tres sunt, qui dicunt testimonium in caelo: pater, uerbum et spiritus, et haec tria unum sunt in Christo Iesu. Non tamen dixit: unus est in Christo Iesu. 

Et in euangelio dicit: Ite, baptizate gentes in nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti. Et denuo ipse dominus dicit: Ego et pater unum sumus. Et in psalmis legimus: Dicit dominus domino meo: Sede a dextris meis. Et in euangelio Iohannis sic dicit: In principio erat uerbum, et uerbum erat apud deum, et deus erat uerbum. 

Deum ergo dicendum uerbum, id est filium qui est apud patrem. Deum bis nominando deum patrem et filium designauit personas. Et in Genesi deus pater ad deum filium dicit: Faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram. Et denuo: Fecit deus hominem ad imaginem dei. 

Igitur ter deum dicendo non tres deos dixit, sed unum deum in tribus personis demonstrauit, nullum sane, sicut Arrius, altero maiorem. Quia autem tempore aut mensura aut honore unus quisque alio maior <non> est, ideo nos credimus, filium dei sine tempore a patre genitum. Quomodo potest minor esse tempore, qui ante tempore est? Aut quomodo mensura minor creditur, qui inmensus et inextimabilis est? et infinitus est? ac honore minor est, cum sit filius dei et deus? Vnum enim dei nomen est. 

Quando autem sit filius a patre genitus, aut ubi, aut quomodo, non licet dici, neque amplius scrutari. Quando autem dicendo tempus designas, ubi requirendo locum significas, quomodo scrutando mensuram uideris exprimere. Et haec tria in domino non cadunt, quia est inextimabilis, inmensus, infinitus, et quia locum non capit, quem mens nostra, quae modo concluditur, <inuestigare possit>. 

Inuestigare nemo potens factorem et dominum suum. Sicut ergo in hac trinitate una et inseparabilis est substantia atque diuinitas, ita et una est omnipotentia, non tres. Omnipotentia enim in eo dicitur, quod potentia et uirtute sua deus ex nihilo fecit uniuersa, id est caelestia et terrestria, carnalia et spiritalia, lucem atque tenebras, uisibilia et inuisibilia, angelos et animas et quidquid praeter deum mens humana crediderit. 

Et haec bona per filium facta sunt, sanctificata spiritu sancto, quem paracletum appellamus, qui super apostolis...

Here is my unprofessional translation of the Latin text (I would welcome a more professional translation):

Exposition of the Catholic Faith

We believe that one God, according to Scripture, is to be believed—not, as the Jews or heretics, solitary, but in the mystery of the Trinity, that is, the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, three persons, yet not three gods.

But we speak of persons in this way: not so that we may compose the divinity, in a heretical sense, with limbs, as a human being, because the divinity, which is incorporeal, is so immense, so inestimable, that it contains all things within itself, but itself cannot be circumscribed; but so that we may believe the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit to be one and undivided in divinity and power, while three in persons—that is, so that we believe the Father not to be the Son, and we believe the Son not to be the Father, and the Holy Spirit to be neither the Father nor the Son. For the Father is unbegotten, but the Son was begotten by the Father without beginning, and the Holy Spirit proceeded from the Father and receives from the Son, as the evangelist testifies, because it is written: “There are three who speak testimony in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Spirit, and these three are one in Christ Jesus.” Yet he did not say: “This is [TF note: i.e., in the singular] one in Christ Jesus.”

And in the Gospel he says: “Go, baptize the nations in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” And again the Lord himself says: “I and the Father are one.” And in the Psalms we read: “The Lord said to my Lord: Sit at my right hand.” And in the Gospel of John he speaks thus: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and God was the Word.”

Therefore the Word is to be called God, that is, the Son who is with the Father. By naming God twice, he designated the persons, God the Father and the Son. And in Genesis God the Father says to God the Son: “Let us make man according to our image and likeness.” And again: “God made man according to the image of God.”

Therefore, by saying “God” three times, he did not speak of three gods, but showed one God in three persons—certainly no one, as Arius, greater than another. But because each one is not greater than another in time or measure or honor, therefore we believe the Son of God to have been begotten by the Father without time. How can he be lesser in time, who is before time? Or how is he believed to be lesser by measure, who is immeasurable and inestimable? And is he infinite? And is he lesser in honor, since he is the Son of God and God? For there is one name of God.

But when the Son was begotten by the Father, or where, or how, it is not permitted to say, nor to investigate further. For when, by saying “when,” you indicate time; by asking “where,” you signify place; by investigating “how,” you seem to express measure. And these three things do not fall upon the Lord, because he is inestimable, immeasurable, infinite, and because he does not take up place—whom our mind, which is now enclosed, is not able to investigate [TF note: the scholarly conjecture "investigare possit" suggests we "can investigate" it, but see the next line of the text].

No one is able to investigate his Maker and Lord. Therefore, just as in this Trinity there is one and inseparable substance and divinity, so also there is one omnipotence, not three. For omnipotence is spoken of in this, that God, by his own power and strength, made all things out of nothing, that is, heavenly and earthly things, fleshly and spiritual things, light and darkness, visible and invisible things, angels and souls, and whatever the human mind might believe besides God.

And these good things were made through the Son, sanctified by the Holy Spirit, whom we call the Paraclete, who upon the apostles...

A few observations about the form of the Johannine Comma as found here.  First, the text of the comma is: "Tres sunt, qui dicunt testimonium in caelo: pater, uerbum et spiritus, et haec tria unum sunt in Christo Jesu."

We cannot tell from this quotation whether this comes before or after the earthly witnesses for Ps-Isaac.  The text, such as is present, differs only slightly from Priscillian's text: "tria sunt quae testimonium dicunt in caelo: pater, uerbum et spiritus et haec tria unum sunt in Christo Jesu." (see more complete discussion of Priscillian here)

Thus, like Priscillian's text, "in Christ Jesus" is present and the phrase "these three are one in Christ Jesus" uses neuter forms of "these" and "three". Also like Priscillian's text, the word "holy" does not accompany "spirit".  Additionally, like Priscillian's text, the concept of testifying is expressed in terms of uttering testimony, although the order of the words is swapped.  Notably, perhaps, "three" and "which" are masculine in the first instance, in contrast to Priscillian.   

Ps-Isaac does not explicitly identify John as the author, but does ascribe the phrase to the "evangelist."  By contrast, Priscillian says John said it, but does not specify whether it is John the Evangelist.

Among scholarly references to the work, we have:

  • "32. Dubie Isaac Iudaeus (fl. c. 384), Expositio fidei catholicae; CPL 190; PF/EF." (Gyug, R. F. (2017). Ritual, Text and Law: Studies in Medieval Canon Law and Liturgy Presented to Roger E. Reynolds. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.  link)
  • "18] f. 74r-v, <Expositio fidei catholica, mutila alla fine> (<inter dubia> di Isaac = Ambrosiaster ? CPL 190, da questo solo codice; <in Africa saec. V-VI composita >, F. Stegmüller, Repertorium Biblicum Medii Aevi, VI, ..." (Italia medioevale e umanistica. (1989). Italy: Editrice Antenore.. link)
  • "The other critic is the author of an Expositio fidei catholicae[52], a text which is related to the Fides of Isaac the Jew.[53] Here the phrase clearly occurs as a variant of the Comma Johannaeum. The Expositio reads: Tres sunt qui dicunt testimonium in caelo: pater, uerbum et spiritus, at haec tria unum sunt in Christo Jesu. Then follows the criticism: Non tamen dixit: 'unus est in Christo Iesu.'" (Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie. (1991). Netherlands: Redactie Bijdragen. p. 362)

There is a problem of trying to date this work.  Clare K. Rothschild sums up the state of the scholarship this way:

(Rothschild, C. K. (2022). The Muratorian Fragment: Text, Translation, Commentary. Germany: Mohr Siebeck., p. 132)

In short, there are some scholars who date the text (as distinct from the manuscript) to the fifth or sixth century, others that date it as early as the second half of the fourth century.  The dating of the text is, unhelpfully for us, tied to the emergence of the Johannine Comma.  There may be other theological issues that could assist dating of the work.  For example, while the late 5th century work of Victor (discussed here) describes the procession of the Spirit as being from the Father, but makes no mention of the Son in this context, the author of the present work suggests that the Spirit, in addition to proceeding from the father, "et accipit de filio" (and receives from the Son).  

From my standpoint, this suggests the possibility of later doctrinal development, although it is hard to be sure.  Given that the manuscript itself is dated to the 8th century, that provides an outer bound on the date of composition. If we were to take a late 7th or even 8th century date as the date of composition, the reference to "heretics" could be a reference to the Unitarianism of the Muslims of those centuries. 

I sought in vain for any researcher on the historical development of the Filioque providing any other historical example of "receives from the Son" in any language.  If anyone knows, I would love to update this discussion with such a detail.

I certainly concur with Karl Künstle that this seems very unlikely to be the work of the same Isaac whose "Faith of Isaac the Jew" is known to us.  Given that the comma is the first text that the present author cites in this relatively short work, it is unlikely that the same author would not have mentioned the comma in his longer work.  So, it seems safe to say that the author is simply unknown, although he stands against both Unitarian and Arian views.

Ultimately, this text stands as another witnesses to a form of the Johannine Comma similar to that of Priscillian from the late 4th century, arguably the earliest discernable form of the interpolation.  


Friday, September 12, 2025

Nick's Errors: The Marginal Annotation Argument

Nick Sayers, an outspoken and influential advocate for the perfection of the King James Version, has offered a flawed argument regarding the marginal notations present in the 1611 printings of the KJV.  In a nutshell, Sayers' argument is that the alternative readings in the 1611 margins, those places where the text says, "Or, ..." are not alternative translations/readings (which Sayers thinks would be doubt-producing) but rather they are simply a way of the KJV translators acknowledging that others have erroneously provided a different reading (an approach that Sayers believes is faith-producing).

On the other hand, the KJV translators themselves in "The Translators to the Reader," explain (source):

Some peradventure would have no varietie of sences to be set in the margine, lest the authoritie of the Scriptures for deciding of controversies by that shew of uncertaintie, should somewhat be shaken. But we hold their judgmet not to be so be so sound in this point. For though, whatsoever things are necessary are manifest, as S. Chrysostome saith, and as S. Augustine, In those things that are plainely set downe in the Scriptures, all such matters are found that concerne Faith, hope, and Charitie. Yet for all that it cannot be dissembled, that partly to exercise and whet our wits, partly to weane the curious from loathing of them for their every-where-plainenesse, partly also to stirre up our devotion to crave the assistance of Gods spirit by prayer, and lastly, that we might be forward to seeke ayd of our brethren by conference, and never scorne those that be not in all respects so complete as they should bee, being to seeke in many things our selves, it hath pleased God in his divine providence, heere and there to scatter wordes and sentences of that difficultie and doubtfulnesse, not in doctrinall points that concerne salvation, (for in such it hath beene vouched that the Scriptures are plaine) but in matters of lesse moment, that fearefulnesse would better beseeme us then confidence, and if we will resolve, to resolve upon modestie with S. Augustine, (though not in this same case altogether, yet upon the same ground) Melius est dubitare de occultis, quàm litigare de incertis, it is better to make doubt of those things which are secret, then to strive about those things that are uncertaine. There be many words in the Scriptures, which be never found there but once, (having neither brother nor neighbour, as the Hebrewes speake) so that we cannot be holpen by conference of places. Againe, there be many rare names of certaine birds, beastes and precious stones, &c. concerning which the Hebrewes themselves are so divided among themselves for judgement, that they may seeme to have defined this or that, rather because they would say something, the because they were sure of that which they said, as S. Jerome somewhere saith of the Septuagint. Now in such a case, doth not a margine do well to admonish the Reader to seeke further, and not to conclude or dogmatize upon this or that peremptorily? For as it is a fault of incredulitie, to doubt of those things that are evident: so to determine of such things as the Spirit of God hath left (even in the judgment of the judicious) questionable, can beno lesse then presumption. Therfore as S. Augustine saith, that varietie of Translations is profitable for the finding out of the sense of the Scriptures: so diversitie of signification and sense in the margine, where the text is not so cleare, must needes doe good, yea is necessary, as we are perswaded. We know that Sixtus Quintus expresly forbiddeth, that any varietie of readings of their vulgar edition, should be put in the margine, (which though it be not altogether the same thing to that we have in hand, yet it looketh that way) but we thinke he hath not all of his owne side his favourers, for this conceit. They that are wise, had rather have their judgements at libertie in differences of readings, then to be captivated to one, when it may be the other. If they were sure that their hie Priest had all lawes shut up in his brest, as Paul the second bragged, and that he were as free from errour by speciall priviledge, as the Dictators of Rome were made by law inviolable, it were an other matter; then his word were an Oracle, his opinion a decision. But the eyes of the world are now open, God be thanked, and have bene a great while, they find that he is subject to the same affections and infirmities that others be, that his skin is penetrable, and therefore so much as he prooveth, not as much as he claimeth, they grant and embrace. 

In other words, the KJV translators were using the margins to express uncertainty where they thought uncertainty was warranted.

You can find an allegedly exhaustive list of the marginal notes at the linked website (link), although the page's author (Calvin George?) acknowledges that the marginal notes in the Apocrypha were not included.  Also, given that there are over 7,300 marginal notes, there may be some errors on the page.  

While I have a lot of respect for Sayers' integrity, and I am confident that he remains convinced that his speculation regarding the marginal annotations is correct, I am unable to locate any sound basis for accepting his claim.  The main evidence to which I've heard him appeal is that in many cases the alternative translation or reading is one that was used by one of the then-contemporary English Bibles, such as the Bishops' Bible or the Geneva Bible.  This is unpersuasive as evidence against the thesis that the KJV translators were themselves (as a collective) uncertain.  Indeed, it is more reasonable to suppose that they were indeed aware of the alternative translation and while they favored the translation they selected, they were not so sure of themselves as to entirely write off the alternative translation.  

Timothy Berg has provided an interesting article, The Five Types of Marginal Notes in the King James Bible, providing a taxonomy of the various kinds of marginal notes in the 1611 KJV.

Tuesday, June 10, 2025

Giannozzo Manetti and the Johannine Comma

Giannozzo Manetti (1396-1459) was arguably the leading expert on translation from Greek to Latin in the 15th century.  His translation of the New Testament remains (as far as I can tell) unpublished.  However, (as I've previously discussed here) his manuscripts are available to view online. 

Manetti's New Testament at 1 John 5:7-8 has the following:

Notice that 1 John 5:7-8 in his manuscript is this:

quia tres sunt qui in caelo testificantur, Pater, Verbum, et Spiritus Sanctus. Et hi tres unum sunt. Et tres sunt qui in terra testificantur: Spiritus, aqua et sanguis 

Manetti's Greek source is available.  Here is his Greek text:

The Greek text is identical the NA28 main text:

ὅτι τρεῖς εἰσιν οἱ μαρτυροῦντες, τὸ πνεῦμα καὶ τὸ ὕδωρ καὶ τὸ αἷμα, καὶ οἱ τρεῖς εἰς τὸ ἕν εἰσιν. 

Why, then, does his Latin not agree with the Greek?  The short answer is that he was influenced by the Latin text he was aiming to improve.

Here is the Vulgate Latin text from which he was working:

The Latin text is:

quia tres sunt qui testimonium dant in caelo, Pater, Verbum, et Spiritus Sanctus. Et hi tres unum sunt. Et tres sunt qui testimonium dant in terra: Spiritus, aqua et sanguis 

You may note the change that Manetti offers to the Vulgate text: a change from "[they] give testimony" to "[they] testify."  It seems to be a more word-for-word translation.  However, Manetti skates right past the absence of the JC in the Greek text.

You will note that contrary to the Clementine Vulgate and the KJV, the Latin text agrees with Alcuin's Vulgate (discussed here) against the Clementine Vulgate and KJV/DRB (link) in that it does not include a second instance of "these three are one" after the three earthly witnesses.  Again, he has to somewhat ignore his Greek text to do this.

In the previous post, we discussed issues related to Revelation 16:5, where "fourth angel" and "Lord" were included in Manetti's translation on the basis of the Latin, not the Greek (link).  So, it should not be very surprising that his Latin "translation" is more of a moderate improvement to an existing Latin text, rather than a fresh translation from Greek to Latin of his actual Greek text.

Sunday, December 15, 2024

Psalm 37:8 - Background to the King James text

A word of caution about this post.  This is essentially a work in progress post that provides some thoughts I had about the background to the King James Version translation of Psalm 37:8.  


In a recent interview, Mark Ward recently pointed out how hard this verse is to the modern ear (link).  This has prompted me to consider what lead us to the translation that appears in the KJV.  I have a working theory that the King James translators spoke Latin the way that modern-day European scholars speak English, and that although some (such as John Bois) were excellent in Hebrew, even those who were excellent in Hebrew were much more excellent in going between Latin and English than in going between Hebrew and English.  Likewise, I think that Greek was a more widely studied language among the King James translators than Hebrew. So, I think it is only natural that the King James translators, whose task it was to revise the Bishops' Bible, would have started from comparing the English to the Latin translations of the Hebrew and the Greek and then also to the Greek translation of the Hebrew. They surely also checked the printed editions of Vulgate Latin that they had.  Many of these same translators also likely knew French, so they may have checked French translations for verification of their understanding.   This is, of course, just a working theory that hopefully helps the reader understand why I'm digging through secondary or tertiary translation work as the background to the KJV.  In reality, it is the Hebrew of the Psalms that is authoritative, not any language translation thereof.

In 1515, Felix Pratensis offered a Latin translation of the Hebrew of the book of Psalms. His translation of Psalm 37:8 was as follows:


(source)  

My transcription is this:

Left Margin: 6 Relaxa ab ira.

8. Desine 6 ab ira et derelinque furorem: ne contendas 7 attamen ut maligneris.

Right Margin: 7 Ne commiscearis vel emuleris: certe ut maligna facias.

This would translate to something like:

Desist [6] from wrath and abandon fury; do not strive [7], at any rate, to malign. 

[6] Relax from wrath.

[7] Do not associate or emulate; surely from evil-doers.

The Clementine Vulgate (1598 edition) has this:

My transcription is this:

Desine ab ira, et derelinque furorem: noli aemulari ut maligneris.


Translation by the Rheimists was (source):

  • Cease from wrath, and leave furie: have not emulation that thou be malignant.

Beza's 1588


Desine ab ira, et derelinque furorem: noli aemulari, ut maligneris.

Previous Protestant Translations in English

Coverdale Bible (source) / Matthew's Bible (source)  1535

  • Leaue of from wrath, let go displeasure, let not thy gelousy moue the also to do euell.

Great Bible (source) 1539

  • Leaue of from wrath, & let go displeasure, frett not thy self, els shalt thou be moued to do euell.

Bishops' Bible (source) 1568

  • Leaue of from wrath, and let go displeasure: fret not thy selfe, lest thou be moued to do euill

Geneva Bible (source) (not sure if this is the 1560/1599 text)

  • Cease from anger, and leaue off wrath: fret not thy selfe also to doe euill.

Other versions:
Olivetan Bible (1535)

Bible Geneve (1588)
Other interesting point.  The Clementine Vulgate project (source) provides two Latin versions:
  • he dimitte iram et relinque furorem noli contendere ut malefacias
  • desine ab ira et derelinque furorem noli aemulari ut maligneris
The first version includes the Hebrew letter transliterated as "he" before the line.  



Wednesday, October 23, 2024

The Plow Boy (or Ploughboy) and Translation

 Dr. Dan Haifly, in his recent debate with Dr. Mark Ward, made the following comment (see here):

Mark and and several of his friends and fellow fellow students have said -- I say students of the Bible -- they talk about the plow boy. The guy that edited the ESV he said, "I think there's a misunderstanding when we talk about the plow boy." He said, "I don't think the King James translators were trying to get it understandable to the plowboy." He said, "I think they were talking about trying to disseminate it so it got to every plow boy." Can I say this real quickly, do you know why they weren't trying to make it understandable to the plow boy in 1611? Because the plow boy couldn't read. They had to teach them how to read first."

A few responses:

1) In a word, "No." You don't have to teach someone how to read before they can begin learning the Scriptures. Didymus the Blind comes to mind as an obvious counter-example. Our children are another: start teaching them the Scriptures before they learn to read.


2) It is not the King James translators who came up with the ploughboy idea. My friend, Mark, during the debate emphasized the use attributed to Tyndale in Foxe's Book of Martyrs, but the idea goes even beyond Tyndale to Erasmus himself. Erasmus in his "Paraclesis to the Pious Reader" serving as an introduction to his 1516 New Testament stated (Ann Dalzell's translation from ERASMUS. The New Testament Scholarship of Erasmus: An Introduction with Erasmus’ Preface and Ancillary Writings. Edited by Robert D. Sider, vol. 41, University of Toronto Press, 2019, pp. 411-12):

I would like every woman to read the Gospel, to read the Epistles of Paul. And oh, that these books were translated into every tongue of every land so that not only the Scots and the Irish but Turks and Saracens too could read and get to know them. The first stage, unquestionably, is to get to know them – somehow or other. Granted that many people would laugh; yet some would be won over. How I wish that the farmer at his plough would chant some passage from these books, that the weaver at his shuttles would sing something from them; that the traveller would relieve the tedium of his journey with stories of this kind; that all the discussions of all Christians would start from these books, for our daily conversation reflects in large measure what we are.

Notice that Erasmus recognizes the value of memorization and oral transmission for those not in a position to read (yet or at that moment). Given Tyndale's reliance on Erasmus for the text of the New Testament, it would be shocking if he did not get this idea either from Erasmus himself or at least from a common source.

3) The King James translators did indeed aim to put the words of Scripture into ordinary and understandable words, to the extent possible. They prefaced their translation with a Letter to the Reader, which establishes this very point:

But how shall men meditate in that, which they cannot understand? How shall they understand that which is kept close in an unknown tongue? as it is written, Except I know the power of the voice, I shall be to him that speaketh, a Barbarian, and he that speaketh, shall be a Barbarian to me. [1 Cor 14] The Apostle excepteth no tongue; not Hebrew the ancientest, not Greek the most copious, not Latin the finest. Nature taught a natural man to confess, that all of us in those tongues which we do not understand, are plainly deaf; we may turn the deaf ear unto them. The Scythian counted the Athenian, whom he did not understand, barbarous; so the Roman did the Syrian, and the Jew (even S. Jerome himself calleth the Hebrew tongue barbarous, belike because it was strange to so many) so the Emperor of Constantinople calleth the Latin tongue, barbarous, though Pope Nicolas do storm at it: so the Jews long before Christ called all other nations, Lognazim, which is little better than barbarous. Therefore as one complaineth, that always in the Senate of Rome, there was one or other that called for an interpreter: so lest the Church be driven to the like exigent, it is necessary to have translations in a readiness. Translation it is that openeth the window, to let in the light; that breaketh the shell, that we may eat the kernel; that putteth aside the curtain, that we may look into the most Holy place; that removeth the cover of the well, that we may come by the water, even as Jacob rolled away the stone from the mouth of the well, by which means the flocks of Laban were watered [Gen 29:10]. Indeed without translation into the vulgar tongue, the unlearned are but like children at Jacob's well (which was deep) [John 4:11] without a bucket or something to draw with; or as that person mentioned by Isaiah, to whom when a sealed book was delivered, with this motion, Read this, I pray thee, he was fain to make this answer, I cannot, for it is sealed. [Isa 29:11]

...

Now though the Church were thus furnished with Greek and Latin Translations, even before the faith of Christ was generally embraced in the Empire; (for the learned know that even in S. Jerome's time, the Consul of Rome and his wife were both Ethnics, and about the same time the greatest part of the Senate also) yet for all that the godly-learned were not content to have the Scriptures in the Language which themselves understood, Greek and Latin, (as the good Lepers were not content to fare well themselves, but acquainted their neighbors with the store that God had sent, that they also might provide for themselves) [2 Kings 7:9] but also for the behoof and edifying of the unlearned which hungered and thirsted after righteousness, and had souls to be saved as well as they, they provided Translations into the vulgar for their Countrymen, insomuch that most nations under heaven did shortly after their conversion, hear Christ speaking unto them in their mother tongue, not by the voice of their Minister only, but also by the written word translated.

...

Now the Church of Rome would seem at the length to bear a motherly affection towards her children, and to allow them the Scriptures in their mother tongue: but indeed it is a gift, not deserving to be called a gift, an unprofitable gift: they must first get a licence in writing before they may use them, and to get that, they must approve themselves to their Confessor, that is, to be such as are, if not frozen in the dregs, yet soured with the leaven of their superstition. Howbeit, it seemed too much to Clement the Eighth that there should be any Licence granted to have them in the vulgar tongue, and therefore he overruleth and frustrateth the grant of Pius the Fourth. So much are they afraid of the light of the Scripture, (Lucifugae Scripturarum, as Tertulian speaketh) that they will not trust the people with it, no not as it is set forth by their own sworn men, no not with the Licence of their own Bishops and Inquisitors. Yea, so unwilling they are to communicate the Scriptures to the people's understanding in any sort, that they are not ashamed to confess, that we forced them to translate it into English against their wills. This seemeth to argue a bad cause, or a bad conscience, or both. Sure we are, that it is not he that hath good gold, that is afraid to bring it to the touchstone, but he that hath the counterfeit; neither is it the true man that shunneth the light, but the malefactor, lest his deeds should be reproved [John 3:20]: neither is it the plain-dealing Merchant that is unwilling to have the weights, or the meteyard brought in place, but he that useth deceit. But we will let them alone for this fault, and return to translation.

...

Therefore let no man's eye be evil, because his Majesty's is good; neither let any be grieved, that we have a Prince that seeketh the increase of the spiritual wealth of Israel (let Sanballats and Tobiahs do so, which therefore do bear their just reproof) but let us rather bless God from the ground of our heart, for working this religious care in him, to have the translations of the Bible maturely considered of and examined. For by this means it cometh to pass, that whatsoever is sound already (and all is sound for substance, in one or other of our editions, and the worst of ours far better than their authentic vulgar) the same will shine as gold more brightly, being rubbed and polished; also, if anything be halting, or superfluous, or not so agreeable to the original, the same may be corrected, and the truth set in place.

...

Lastly, we have on the one side avoided the scrupulosity of the Puritans, who leave the old Ecclesiastical words, and betake them to other, as when they put Washing for Baptism, and Congregation instead of Church: as also on the other side we have shunned the obscurity of the Papists, in their Azimes, Tunike, Rational, Holocausts, Praepuce, Pasche, and a number of such like, whereof their late Translation is full, and that of purpose to darken the sense, that since they must needs translate the Bible, yet by the language thereof, it may be kept from being understood. But we desire that the Scripture may speak like itself, as in the language of Canaan, that it may be understood even of the very vulgar.

In short, while I commend Dr. Haifly's tone, I think he is way off on the substance.

Monday, May 20, 2024

A Third Cavil against the King James Version

In the letter to the readers, the translators of the King James Version provided the following defense of their translation against a contemporary cavil offered primarily by their Roman Catholic adversaries (source):

Yet before we end, we must answer a third cavil and objection of theirs against us, for altering and amending our Translations so oft; wherein truly they deal hardly, and strangely with us. For to whom ever was it imputed for a fault (by such as were wise) to go over that which he had done, and to amend it where he saw cause? Saint Augustine was not afraid to exhort S. Jerome to a Palinodia or recantation; the same S. Augustine was not ashamed to retractate, we might say revoke, many things that had passed him, and doth even glory that he seeth his infirmities. If we will be sons of the Truth, we must consider what it speaketh, and trample upon our own credit, yea, and upon other men's too, if either be any way an hindrance to it. This to the cause: then to the persons we say, that of all men they ought to be most silent in this case. For what varieties have they, and what alterations have they made, not only of their Service books, Portesses and Breviaries, but also of their Latin Translation? The Service book supposed to be made by S. Ambrose (Officium Ambrosianum) was a great while in special use and request; but Pope Hadrian calling a Council with the aid of Charles the Emperor, abolished it, yea, burnt it, and commanded the Service book of Saint Gregory universally to be used. Well, Officium Gregorianum gets by this means to be in credit, but doth it continue without change or altering? No, the very Roman Service was of two fashions, the New fashion, and the Old, (the one used in one Church, the other in another) as is to be seen in Pamelius a Romanist, his Preface, before Micrologus. the same Pamelius reporteth out Radulphus de Rivo, that about the year of our Lord, 1277, Pope Nicolas the Third removed out of the Churches of Rome, the more ancient books (of Service) and brought into use the Missals of the Friers Minorites, and commanded them to be observed there; insomuch that about an hundred years after, when the above name Radulphus happened to be at Rome, he found all the books to be new, (of the new stamp). Neither were there this chopping and changing in the more ancient times only, but also of late: Pius Quintus himself confesseth, that every Bishopric almost had a peculiar kind of service, most unlike to that which others had: which moved him to abolish all other Breviaries, though never so ancient, and privileged and published by Bishops in their Dioceses, and to establish and ratify that only which was of his own setting forth, in the year 1568. Now when the father of their Church, who gladly would heal the sore of the daughter of his people softly and slightly, and make the best of it, findeth so great fault with them for their odds and jarring; we hope the children have no great cause to vaunt of their uniformity. But the difference that appeareth between our Translations, and our often correcting of them, is the thing that we are specially charged with; let us see therefore whether they themselves be without fault this way, (if it be to be counted a fault, to correct) and whether they be fit men to throw stones at us: O tandem maior parcas insane minori: they that are less sound themselves, ought not to object infirmities to others. If we should tell them that Valla, Stapulensis, Erasmus, and Vives found fault with their vulgar Translation, and consequently wished the same to be mended, or a new one to be made, they would answer peradventure, that we produced their enemies for witnesses against them; albeit, they were in no other sort enemies, than as S. Paul was to the Galatians, for telling them the truth [Gal 4:16]: and it were to be wished, that they had dared to tell it them plainlier and oftener. But what will they say to this, that Pope Leo the Tenth allowed Erasmus' Translation of the New Testament, so much different from the vulgar, by his Apostolic Letter and Bull; that the same Leo exhorted Pagnine to translate the whole Bible, and bare whatsoever charges was necessary for the work? Surely, as the Apostle reasoneth to the Hebrews, that if the former Law and Testament had been sufficient, there had been no need of the latter: [Heb 7:11 and 8:7] so we may say, that if the old vulgar had been at all points allowable, to small purpose had labour and charges been undergone, about framing of a new. If they say, it was one Pope's private opinion, and that he consulted only himself; then we are able to go further with them, and to aver, that more of their chief men of all sorts, even their own Trent champions Paiva and Vega, and their own Inquisitors, Hieronymus ab Oleastro, and their own Bishop Isidorus Clarius, and their own Cardinal Thomas a Vio Caietan, do either make new Translations themselves, or follow new ones of other men's making, or note the vulgar Interpreter for halting; none of them fear to dissent from him, nor yet to except against him. And call they this an uniform tenor of text and judgment about the text, so many of their Worthies disclaiming the now received conceit? Nay, we will yet come nearer the quick: doth not their Paris edition differ from the Lovaine, and Hentenius his from them both, and yet all of them allowed by authority? Nay, doth not Sixtus Quintus confess, that certain Catholics (he meaneth certain of his own side) were in such an humor of translating the Scriptures into Latin, that Satan taking occasion by them, though they thought of no such matter, did strive what he could, out of so uncertain and manifold a variety of Translations, so to mingle all things, that nothing might seem to be left certain and firm in them, etc.? Nay, further, did not the same Sixtus ordain by an inviolable decree, and that with the counsel and consent of his Cardinals, that the Latin edition of the old and new Testament, which the Council of Trent would have to be authentic, is the same without controversy which he then set forth, being diligently corrected and printed in the Printing-house of Vatican? Thus Sixtus in his Preface before his Bible. And yet Clement the Eighth his immediate successor, publisheth another edition of the Bible, containing in it infinite differences from that of Sixtus, (and many of them weighty and material) and yet this must be authentic by all means. What is to have the faith of our glorious Lord Jesus Christ with Yea or Nay, if this be not? Again, what is sweet harmony and consent, if this be? Therefore, as Demaratus of Corinth advised a great King, before he talked of the dissensions among the Grecians, to compose his domestic broils (for at that time his Queen and his son and heir were at deadly feud with him) so all the while that our adversaries do make so many and so various editions themselves, and do jar so much about the worth and authority of them, they can with no show of equity challenge us for changing and correcting.

Saturday, May 18, 2024

Pope Sixtus V - Aeternus Ille (1589) - a New Translation

The following is a new translation of the papal bull, Aeternus Ille, based on the public domain Latin Text (available here).  The post originally, erroneously referred to the author as Clement VIII, which is still reflected (sadly) in the post's URL. As the date reflects (and the Latin source makes clear), the work is by Pope Sixtus V, not Pope Clement VIII.

The eternal Creator and Governor of all celestial and terrestrial things, God, wonderfully planted and nurtured the Holy Church, as a Paradise of delights, with various plants and roots by His own hand, like a provident Farmer. At the same time, He irrigated it with the abundant source of the Holy Scriptures, spreading them like many rivers throughout the entire world, so that the holy mysteries and divine oracles contained in the sacred books, prepared for the salvation of all nations, would be proclaimed in those three languages which have been most widespread among all nations and consecrated by the title of the most Holy Cross. They declared the Kingdom of our Savior to the Hebrews, Greeks, and Latins.

But the cunning and wicked enemy of the human race, whose envy brought the sting of death and whose pride was the teacher of sin, left no stone unturned to suppress the heavenly seed of the divine word as much as possible. Whether by oppressing it at its birth, uprooting it when grown, or corrupting it when mature, he particularly tried by all means and devices to bring forth some most corrupt editions of the sacred Scriptures, so that impiety would hide under the guise of piety, and people would be offered dross instead of silver, dragon's bile instead of wine, and poison instead of milk.

And since not only among heretics, but even among some Catholics, although with different intentions, there arose an excessive and not entirely praiseworthy zeal, almost a lust for interpreting the Scriptures into Latin, Satan, the author of all evil, used them, even if they were unaware, to create such confusion and diversity of versions that he tried to make everything doubtful. He endeavored to bring the matter to the point that, while different interpreters introduced different forms and appearances into the words of the Scriptures, nothing certain, nothing stable, and no inviolable authority could be found in them without great difficulty, so that it was greatly feared that we might return to that ancient chaos of editions about which St. Jerome said: "Among the Latins, there are as many versions as there are copies. Each one added or subtracted according to his own judgment, and certainly, what is inconsistent cannot be true."

Likewise, St. Augustine said that the Latin interpreters of the Scriptures could not be numbered. For, as he says, in the early days of faith, anyone who got hold of a Greek manuscript and seemed to have some knowledge of both languages dared to translate it. Therefore, the holy Council of Trent, wishing to remedy this disorder, decreed that among all the Latin editions of the sacred books, the old and commonly used Vulgate, which had been approved by the long-standing use of so many centuries in the Church, should be held as authentic in public readings, disputations, sermons, and expositions, and that no one should dare or presume to reject it under any pretext.

However, although the Vulgate edition was one, it seemed to be divided into several by various readings. Although some of these readings were introduced by the authority of old manuscripts or the holy Fathers, many others crept in due to the injury of time, the carelessness of scribes, the ignorance of printers, the rashness of emenders, or the audacity of recent interpreters who, although they are sons of the Church, thought they should pay more attention to the Jewish Rabbis than to the doctors of the Church. Moreover, they infiltrated from the annotations of heretics and their deceitful tricks at the margins. And although nothing has been found in this great variety of readings that could cast a shadow over the causes of faith and morals, it was feared that, with the increasing boldness of adding and subtracting, this most approved edition of the Scriptures, which ought to be the bond of peace, the unity of faith, the link of charity, the consent of the dissenting, and the most certain rule in doubtful matters, might become the introduction of schism and heresy, the wave of doubts, the entanglement of questions, the seed of discord, and the multiple entanglement of pious minds.

This is what St. Jerome mentioned happened to the Greek edition of the seventy interpreters, and St. Augustine to the Latin one. So that this plague might not spread further and gradually contaminate our Vulgate edition, the same wise ecumenical Council of Trent decreed that this old and Vulgate edition should be printed as accurately as possible. But since it would have been of no use to decree the authority of this edition if its genuine reading were not known, and the sacred text were left open to the arbitrary will of disputants, so that what had been drawn against the perfidious enemy as a very sharp sword could also become a shield to cover the sides of the weakened and already defeated enemy, we, indignantly bearing this, and all the more so because in these past twenty-two years from the decree of the said Council of Trent to the beginning of our Pontificate, although such a work had sometimes been begun, it was nevertheless interrupted perhaps due to other occupations, and no remedy had been applied to this imminent evil. Therefore, considering it our duty to pursue this matter with greater care and diligence, as it is both sought by all the churches of God and feared by the synagogues of Satan, as soon as divine mercy called us to the Apostolic See of blessed Peter, although unequal to the merits, we had nothing more urgent than to undertake the desired correction of the Vulgate edition as soon as possible.

Thus, we selected and gathered many learned men who excelled in the knowledge of the Holy Scriptures, sacred Theology, many languages, and long experience in various matters, as well as in sharp judgment and skill when something needs to be discerned, so that they might work diligently in seeking the genuine and pure edition of the sacred text and assist us. For we, considering the magnitude of the matter and wisely reflecting on it, from the special and singular privilege of God, and from the true and legitimate succession of the Prince of the Apostles, St. Peter, for whom our Lord and Redeemer undoubtedly prayed to the eternal Father, out of His reverence, not just once but always, that his faith, not revealed by flesh and blood but by the same Father, might never fail, and to whom the Lord also enjoined to confirm the other Apostles in the same faith, and who, as we trust, does not cease to implore divine help for us until the end of the world, promised to the Catholic Church, and as God disposed, we have been established in the Chair of Peter, in which his power lives and his authority excels, believed that this whole judgment belonged properly and especially to us.

Invoking the help of Almighty God and relying on the authority of the Prince of the Apostles, for the public utility of the holy Church of God, we were not reluctant to undertake this considerable labor of accurate study among other occupations of Pontifical concern. We read through everything that others had collected or thought, considered the reasons for the different readings, reviewed the opinions of the holy Doctors, and judged which should be preferred, so that in this most laborious course of correction, in which we thought it necessary to devote daily effort for many hours, others' work was to consult, ours to choose what was best among many.

Nevertheless, we have entirely retained the old reading received in the Church for many centuries. Meanwhile, we have magnificently built a new printing press in our Apostolic Vatican Palace primarily for this purpose, and to its care, we have appointed a congregation of several Cardinals of the holy Roman Church and a distinguished college of very learned men from almost all nations of the Christian world and the most celebrated universities, endowed with ample and rich revenues, so that the corrected volume of the Scriptures might be printed there. This matter, to ensure it was done without corruption, we ourselves corrected with our own hand any errors that had crept into the press and distinguished those confused or likely to be confused by spacing, larger notes, and punctuation.

Moreover, so that the reasons for this our plan and undertaking may not be unknown, but rather very well known and testified to the whole Catholic Church and posterity, and that all may easily understand what order in this work was observed, what law and method were followed, and what rule of investigating the truth was kept by us: we wish it to be certain and clear to all that our labors and vigils never aimed to bring forth a new edition but to print the old Vulgate edition, as prescribed by the Council of Trent, corrected and restored as closely as possible to its original purity as it first came from the hand and pen of the interpreter.

In this search for the genuine text, it is generally agreed among all that there is no argument more certain and firm than the faith of old and approved Latin manuscripts, both printed and handwritten, which we have procured from various libraries. Therefore, in any reading where more and older and more corrected books agreed, we have decided that this should be retained as the words of the original text or as closest to them. Where assistance was needed to establish the genuine edition, the explanations of the holy Fathers and old expositors who illustrated various places and books of the Scriptures were of great help. Whatever was observed to be useful was included in this work. Finally, in those places where neither the manuscripts nor the doctors' great consensus seemed sufficient, we deemed it necessary to resort to Hebrew and Greek examples, not to correct the errors of the Latin interpreter but to provide something certain and undoubted in place of words that, although ambiguous among the Latins, could have been interpreted otherwise than necessary. Thus, what was inconstant, diverse, and manifold due to varying manuscripts was established uniformly, consistently, and in one manner, with the truth of the sources duly considered.

For the great Doctor St. Jerome wisely advised that, in explaining the sacred Scriptures, as in the New Testament, when a question arises among the Latins and there is variety among the copies, it is customary to refer to the Greek source from which the New Testament was written. St. Augustine also handed down this rule among others to those who handle the Scriptures. Therefore, we religiously followed the laudable custom of the holy Fathers by applying careful attention wherever something was ambiguously said or varied among the Latins. For we know that many think most of the words and expressions of this Latin edition could have been translated more properly, elegantly, clearly, briefly, or copiously by the Latin interpreter, measuring word for word. But such minute and narrow disputation seems trivial, and not of such importance that the reverence for the older Church and the authority of the most holy Fathers should not be rightfully preferred.

Indeed, as St. Gregory attests, it is entirely unworthy that the words of the heavenly oracle should be confined by the rules of Donatus. The authority and excellence of the Vulgate edition are so great that it seems utterly pointless to desire a greater one. For, as handed down to us by our ancestors, the books contained in it were partly retained from a certain common and very ancient Latin edition, which St. Jerome called the Vulgate edition, St. Augustine the Itala, and St. Gregory the old translation, which St. Augustine also considered preferable to the many others then in use because it was more tenacious of the words with clarity of meaning. Partly, they were adopted from the translation of St. Jerome, to whom the honor due is easily understood by anyone who recognizes the dignity of the interpreter.

For St. Jerome, as the same St. Augustine testifies, was learned in Greek, Latin, and Hebrew, and passing from the Western to the Eastern Church, he lived in the holy places and sacred letters until old age. He almost saw or read all who had written about Ecclesiastical doctrine before him from both parts of the world. Not only did Augustine, Chromatius, Paulinus, and other most holy Bishops consult him about the places of the Scriptures, but also Pope Damasus of Rome. He rightly achieved such great fame, especially in the knowledge of the holy Scriptures, that he spared no vigils, no pilgrimages to attain it. He listened to the most learned in Gaul, heard Gregory Nazianzen in Constantinople, Didymus in Alexandria, and sought out others elsewhere, using the most famous teachers of the Hebrew language. Not content with one teacher, he employed many and the most learned, being a diligent investigator not only of things but also of names.

He even inspected the places often mentioned in the Scriptures and testified that this greatly helped him understand the Scriptures. Therefore, anyone who considers the sanctity, genius, learning, diligence, teachers, labors, and the age in which he lived, when studies of all languages, especially Hebrew, flourished, will easily condemn the judgment of those who do not rest content with the works of such an eminent Doctor or believe they can produce better or equal ones. Much more rightly did St. Isidore, the venerable Bede the Presbyter, St. Remigius, Alcuin, Fortunatus, Rabanus Maurus, St. Anselm, St. Bernard, Haymo, Richard and Hugh of St. Victor, Peter of Cluny, Rupert the Abbot, and many other distinguished Doctors who shone in the Church for a thousand years, who used Jerome's version in all disputations, expositions, declamations, so that the others, which were almost innumerable, fell out of the hands of Catholic Fathers and became obsolete. Therefore, we read in St. Isidore that since St. Jerome alone translated the sacred Scriptures from Hebrew into Latin, all Churches everywhere generally use his edition because it is more truthful in meanings and clearer in words.

Before Isidore, St. Gregory the Great felt almost the same. Not only Latin Fathers, but also Hebrews and Greeks, although neglecting or ignoring other Latin interpreters, considered Jerome worthy of their highest testimony and honor. St. Augustine wrote about the Hebrews, and St. Jerome himself about the Greeks, that Sophronius, a very learned man, translated the Psalms and Prophets, which Jerome had translated from Hebrew into Latin, into Greek in an elegant style. Therefore, it is commendable to seek the help of foreign languages where our codes themselves cannot be reconciled or understood. But when this is not necessary, not to revere the sanctity, wisdom, consensus of our ancestors, and the very ancient custom of the Church, for the slightest reasons, must be considered sheer temerity and obstinacy. For this reason, St. Jerome, who advised consulting Hebrews and Greeks in doubtful matters, also thought that this should be done sparingly and as rarely as possible, so that things long accepted do not waver.

For this reason, although he was reluctant to translate the New Testament, calling it a pious labor but a dangerous presumption, he judged that it should be judged by others. To change the language of an old man and recall the already aging world to the beginnings of children seemed a perilous task. For who, learned or unlearned, taking up a volume in his hands and seeing it differ from what he has read, would not immediately cry out, calling the translator a falsifier and a sacrilegious person who dares to add, change, or correct anything in the old writings?

It is well known about the gourd of Jonah, which was read in the Old edition; when Jerome placed an ivy instead, such a tumult was raised among the people because of the disagreement over one word that the bishop who read Jerome's interpretation in the church was compelled, lest he be deposed from the priesthood, to condemn what he had read. Therefore, the sacred Council of Trent rightfully decreed that the books of the old Vulgate edition should be received as canonical, not otherwise than as they have been accustomed to being read in the Church.

To ensure that this old edition, now printed from our press, fully corresponds to the prescription of the same Synod, we not only preserved the old and received modes of speaking but also rejected apocryphal books, retaining the authentic ones. For the third and fourth books of Esdras and the third book of Maccabees, which the Synod does not enumerate among the canonical books, we have entirely excluded from this edition with the assent of the Cardinals of the Congregation appointed over the Vatican printing house. We have also rejected the prayer of Manasseh, which is neither in the Hebrew nor the Greek text, nor found in the older Latin manuscripts, but only in the printed editions appended after the second book of Chronicles, as something sewn on, added, and not holding a place in the text of the sacred books.

We have also deleted certain sentences sometimes inserted from elsewhere into the Vulgate edition but not found in the old manuscripts or the commentaries of the holy Fathers. Finally, we have accurately corrected and purified this edition from various errors that had crept in and restored it to its pristine truth with the greatest diligence.

No one should be surprised if some places in the sacred Scriptures are read differently in certain holy Doctors than in this edition. For Ambrose, Augustine, and many others generally followed the edition of the seventy interpreters. To the praise and glory of Almighty God, for the preservation and increase of the Catholic faith, and the utility of the holy universal Church, by this our constitution, which is to remain in force forever, with the counsel and assent of our venerable brethren the Cardinals of the holy Roman Church, appointed over the Vatican printing house, whose work and diligence we used in the more serious matters of this correction of the Vulgate edition, and from our certain knowledge and the fullness of Apostolic power, we decree and declare that the Vulgate Latin edition of the sacred pages, both old and new Testament, which was received as authentic by the Council of Trent, is to be considered without any doubt or controversy as the very one which, corrected as well as possible and printed in the Vatican printing house, we now publish to be read in the entire Christian Republic and in all the Churches of the Christian world, decreeing that it is confirmed, first by the universal consent of the holy Church and the holy Fathers, then by the decree of the General Council of Trent, and now also by the Apostolic authority handed down to us by the Lord, as the true, legitimate, authentic, and undoubted one, to be received and held in all public and private disputations, readings, sermons, and expositions.

We strictly forbid anyone ever in the future to print any new Vulgate edition of the Scriptures without express permission from the Apostolic See, or to compose any other edition according to their private or peculiar sense, or to print this old Vulgate, now restored by us as mentioned, anywhere else than in our Vatican printing house for ten years from the date of these presents, whether this side of or beyond the mountains. After the aforesaid decade has elapsed, we prescribe that no one should presume to print the holy Scriptures unless they have first received an edition printed in the Vatican printing house, signed with the Inquisitor's own hand of heretical depravity in that province, or, if there is no Inquisitor in that province, with the Bishop's hand of the same place, confirming that not the slightest particle has been changed, added, or subtracted from it. And after the books have been faithfully printed, they should not be sold or published unless, again, an edition signed by the Inquisitor, or, in his absence, the Bishop, has been reviewed to ensure they are printed correctly.

Because of the various readings hitherto written at the margins, it follows that when such variety is first presented to the eyes, it distracts the reader's mind from what he is then engaged in, leading him at an inappropriate time to compare the different readings in the manuscripts. It is not easy to read the Scriptures with an unoffending foot amidst such a variety of readings and to distinguish, in the forest of diversity, what should be preferred. We think it best and believe it will be agreeable to all pious people to free the children of the Church from these perplexities by the judgment of the same Church. Therefore, we command that henceforth only uniform Vulgate Bibles be printed, and nothing diverse from the text be written in the margin. Those printed hitherto in any places should be corrected word for word according to this our text.

In printed or to be printed Missals, Rituals, Pontificals, Ceremonials, and other ecclesiastical books, this should be observed only regarding those Scripture readings and words taken from the Vulgate edition and inserted in the same books. If any printer in any kingdoms, cities, provinces, and places, subject or not subject to our temporal jurisdiction, within the said decade in any way, or after the decade other than according to such an edition handed to him by the Inquisitor or, in his absence, the Bishop, with not even the slightest particle changed, added, or subtracted, or written at the margin or in the text, even by way of annotations, notes, or glosses, should presume to print, or to sell, or offer for sale, or publish such printed books, he, who in any of the above cases or their equivalents has not complied with our Constitution, shall incur not only the loss of all the books and other temporal penalties at discretion, but also the sentence of major excommunication, from which he cannot be absolved, except in the article of death, by anyone other than the existing Roman Pontiff.

If the Inquisitor or Bishop should approve an edition differing from what he handed over for printing, or approved as printed with his sign or subscription, which actually differs, then if he is a bishop, even if he holds an archiepiscopal, primatial, patriarchal, or other major dignity, he shall incur the sentence of interdiction from entering the church; if he is inferior, the sentence of excommunication ipso facto, and not to be absolved by anyone other than the Roman Pontiff. Moreover, the Inquisitor or Bishop who approved such books differing from the Vatican print, and the printer or bookseller who disobeys our expressed orders and prohibitions in any way, shall be bound to give an account of such actions in strict judgment before the Cardinals of the holy Roman and universal Inquisition against heretical depravity, or before a Judge or Judges deputed by the same Congregation, and shall be punished with severe penalties according to the measure of their fault.

If manuscripts or printed Bibles of this Vulgate edition are preserved for the beauty of their characters or some remarkable ornament of the codex, or for the excellence of the print, or for the notes written at the margin, and have not been corrected according to this our exemplar, they shall henceforth have no authority and no faith in matters where they differ from this our edition. We command all Patriarchs, Archbishops, Bishops, and other Prelates of churches and places, both regular and secular, throughout the entire world, to ensure that this present Constitution is perpetually, firmly, and inviolately observed by all in their churches, provinces, cities, dioceses, and jurisdictions, compelling the disobedient by ecclesiastical censures and other suitable legal and factual remedies, without any appeal, invoking also the aid of the secular arm if necessary. Notwithstanding any Apostolic constitutions and ordinances, general or provincial councils, statutes, and customs of any churches, orders, congregations, colleges, and universities, even if fortified by oath, Apostolic confirmation, or any other firmness, privileges, indulgences, and Apostolic letters granted to them, their prelates, superiors, and persons by any Roman Pontiffs, our predecessors, or by us and the aforesaid See, motu proprio, from certain knowledge, and from the fullness of Apostolic power, and other clauses, derogatory clauses, or any other decrees, whether general or specific.

All these, and each of them, even if they contain the explicit provision that they should not be derogated from in any way or without the consent of certain persons, or under certain manner and form expressed therein, and other derogations made to them be null and void, we derogate from to the effect of these presents alone, considering them as expressed in full, and not to be otherwise valid against the aforesaid.

If anyone claims it has been granted by the Apostolic See that they cannot be interdicted, suspended, or excommunicated by Apostolic letters, without full, express, and word-for-word mention of the indult, we will that these letters be published at the doors of the Lateran Basilica, and of the Basilica of the Prince of the Apostles in the city, and of the Apostolic Chancery, as usual, and within four months for those on this side of the mountains, and within eight months for those beyond the mountains from the day of publication, to bind and affect them as if each of them had been personally intimated.

We decree that transcriptions, even printed ones, signed by a notary public and sealed with the seal of an ecclesiastical prelate, should everywhere be given the same faith as these original letters exhibited or shown.

Therefore, let no one at all infringe this page of our statute, declaration, decree, will, prohibition, and derogation, or dare to contradict it with audacious intent. If anyone should presume to attempt this, let him know that he will incur the indignation of Almighty God and the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul.

Given at Rome, at Saint Mary Major, in the year of the Incarnation of the Lord 1589, on the Kalends of March, in the fifth year of our pontificate.

Monday, May 06, 2024

Sedulius Paschal Work, Book 2

Paschal Work, Book 2

Paschale Operis, Liber Secundus

That most wicked serpent had expelled the first man from the flower-filled abode of paradise through deceitful schemes, and had made him taste hidden death with the allure of a pleasant flavor, soon finding it bitter; nor did he alone suffer the penalty of divine wrath as the sole violator of the command, but from him the human progeny, coming forth, succumbed to the condition of prolonged death—alas, the spouse cruel and harmful, or was that serpent more treacherous, that murderous serpent? But you, spouse, also cruel and harmful, alas! Only two had been eternal, after which as the origin began to grow, then perished, and in giving birth to disaster from the seed, took on losses. What did those numerous days and the multiple what did the happy spans of life, exceeding nine hundred years, avail, and seeing in the waning lineage of descendants, of his own kind, foreign blood now, when the fate of human condition in the final unrecoverable hours of the ultimate course was occupied, though late, it nevertheless did not avoid destruction, and life being short through long ages, nothing lasting that was confined by an end would lament, nor to this evil would any hope promise a remedy to come, but the merit of the first earth-born would engulf all the later generations of the seed through a greedy maw, unless that pious creator and founder of all, to whom it is inherent to pour forgiveness on sins rather than to threaten punishment, would deign to raise again the structure of His work, weak from its own foundation, through the same stone, lest the image, which had been made in the likeness of God, would be considered dissimilar in living from death, and would grant the gift of venial indulgence, and prevent the teeth of children from being stunned by the fruits that the parents had devoured unripe, and would give, most gentle and appeased, that from whence death was contracted through sin, from there life might be nourished by piety, immense and like a sweet and most soft rose born from a thorny sod, not to harm the mother whom the grace of delight obscures, thus from the stock of the guilty Eve, Mary, coming with holy light, the virgin following would wash away the filth of the first virgin, so that because the former nature, contaminated by vices, had been subject to the condition of harsh death, with Christ born, man also through man might be reborn through Christ, intending to set aside the original stain of the old body by renewal.

Expulerat serpens ille nequissimus de paradisi sede florigera I primogenitum dolosis artibus uirum et inlecebris blandi saporis absconditam mortem gustare fecerat mox amaram nec indignationis diuinae sententiam solus praecepti temerator uitae damno susceperat sed ab ipso ueniens humana progenies longae mortis fuerat condicioni succumbens heu coniunx crudelis et noxia an ille magis draco perfidus homicida ille draco perfidus homicida sed tu coniunx quoque crudelis et noxia pro dolor duo tantum fuerant aeterni postquam crescere coepit origo tunc periit clademque parturiens a semine detrimenta suscepit quid illa tempestate numerosa dies ac multiplex quid felicibus uitae spatiis nongentos proderat annos excedere nepotumque decima senescente progenie sui generis externum sanguinem iam uidere cum sors humanae condicionis extrema inreparabilis horae supremis cursibus occupata licet serum nequaquam tamen declinaret interitum longamque temporum per aetatem uita breuis existens nihil esse diutinum quod fine clauderetur ingemeret nec huic malo remedium spes ulla promitteret adfuturum sed primi terrigenae meritum sepulchrale cunctas postremi quoque germinis nationes auida passim fauce sorberet nisi pius ille rerum creator et conditor cui proprium est ueniam delictis infundere quam poenaliter inminere fabricam sui operis ab ipso debilem fundamento firmius per eundem rursus lapidem dignaretur erigere ne uidelicet imago quae ad similitudinem Dei facta fuerat uiuens dissimilis haberetur ex morte munusque uenialis indulgentiae largiretur ac pomis quae parentes acerba uorauerant filiorum obstupere dentes arceret donaretque mitissimus ac placatus ut unde mortem peccata contraxerant inde uitam pietas renutriret inmensa ac uelut rosa suauis atque mollissima de spinoso cespite nascitur nil laesura matrem quam gratia iucunditatis obscurat ita de stirpe nocentis Euae Maria sacro ueniente cum lumine primae uirginis luem sequens uirgo dilueret ut quia prior natura uitiis inquinata durae necis fuerat condicioni subiecta nascente Christo per hominem homo quoque possit renasci per Christum originalis maculae foeditatem uetusti corporis innouatione positurus.

After this, when the prophetic voice had foretold repeatedly, and Gabriel the archangel had announced his presence to Mary, soon in the womb of the believing girl, the faithful conception of the word remained inspired, and the celestial offspring lay hidden under the law of being born, which allowed all things to be born by her nod; the virgin's womb swelled and her body, untouched, marveled at the fecundity of her own viscera, promising great assistance to the world, the mystery of a feminine birth without a man, when nourished in the womb stretched tight, the innards of the father, the mother soon to be.

Haec postquam prophetica saepius uox praedixit et Gabrihel archangelus Mariae iam praesentia nuntiauit mox puellae credentis in utero fidelis uerbi mansit adspirata conceptio prolesque siderea nascendi sub lege delituit quae cuncta suo nasci nutu concessit tumebant uirginis sinus et fecunditatem suorum uiscerum corpus mirabatur intactum grande mundo spondebat auxilium feminei partus sine uiro mysterium quando nullius maculae naeuo fuscata tenso nutriebat uentre praecordia genitoris genetrix mox futura.

Meanwhile, the ninth month had passed, and the immortal light of the tenth was shining; and the promise of spiritual grace was made clear by the virginal conception, and the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, that is, dwelt in man, whose flesh He deigned to wear. For the infant was both small and great, small in body but exalted in deity. Flowing through the pure chastity of the hospitable temple, He did not harm the body upon leaving, which He had not harmed when He arrived. This is truly the secret of divine generation; the testimony of the virginal birth is shown, who, guarding the modesty of the mother, entered the closed womb and was conceived and created. Then, that clarity of the new light filled the bounds of the entire world, what joy to heaven, what brilliance shone forth when Christ, with the splendor of a star, like a bridegroom coming out of his chamber, proceeded from Mary's womb, whose divine form seemed to shine with grace so that the Davidic psalm pronounces thus: "You are the most handsome of the sons of men; grace is poured upon your lips," etc. Well, indeed, he is defined as beautiful among the sons of men because, although he took on the image of human incarnation and often called Himself the Son of Man in evangelical proclamation, we were marred by original sin, which He did not have, who purified us with the purity of His birth. O merciful and gentle kindness for salvation, lest the yoke of prolonged servitude for the condition of sin should press upon us, the Lord took on the limbs of a servant. Let us hear the voice of Paul the Apostle saying: "He emptied Himself and took on the form of a servant," etc., and He who clothes all things from the origin of the world in swaddling clothes allowed His own limbs to be wrapped, and to whom the heavens are too small, the earth lacks, the sea's wave is not enough, remained full in a small child's body, God lying in a manger.

Nonus interea mensis effluxerat et decimi lumen inmortale radiabat claruitque fetu uirgineo spiritalis gratiae manifesta promissio et uerbum caro factum est et habitauit in nobis id est habitauit in homine cuius se dignatus est carne uestire infans namque paruus ac maximus membris scilicet exiguus deitate praecelsus per hospitalis templi sinceram defluens castitatem non laesit corpus abscedens quod non laeserat cum uenisset uere diuinae generationis est hoc secretum testis uirginis partus ostenditur qui materni pudoris custos ingressus clausis uisceribus et conceptus est et creatus quae nouae lucis illa tunc claritas mundi totius oras impleuit quae caelo laetitia quis ille nitor effulsit cum Christus splendore sidereo uelut sponsus procedens de thalamo suo Mariae processit ex utero cuius ita species diuina uidebatur gratia praenitere ut Dauiticus ipsum psalmus ita pronuntiet speciosus forma prae filiis hominum diffusa est gratia in labiis tuis et cetera bene autem prae filiis hominum speciosum forma definiuit quia licet humanae susceperit incarnationis effigiem filiumque hominis in euangelica praedicatione saepe se dixerit peccatum nos tamen originale foedauerat quod ipse non habuit qui suae nos natiuitatis puritate mundauit o pietas clemens et facilis ad salutem ne nos iugum diuturnae premeret seruitutis pro condicione peccati Dominus serui membra suscepit audiamus uocem Pauli dicentis Apostoli semet ipsum exinaniuit et formam serui suscepit et cetera quique cuncta uestit ab origine mundi nascentia pannis inuolui sua passus est membra et cui caeli paruus est limes terra deficit maris unda non sufficit plenus mansit in corpore puerili modico Deus recubans in praesepi.

Hail, most excellent parent, consecrated by the childbirth of such a great king, who thus continually reigns over the heavens and the underworlds, so that His empire, power, and name know neither beginning nor end; you who are notably honored by the blessedness of the womb are proven both mother and virgin, no woman is found who equally matches you, none who has preceded or will follow your glory, alone pleasing uniquely to Christ, compared to no one by example.

Salue parens optima tanti regis puerperio consecrata qui supernis ita iugiter dominatur et infernis ut eius imperium potestas et nomen nec initium nouerit habere nec finem quae beati uentris honore conspicuo simul et mater esse probaris et uirgo cui nulla penitus aequalis femina reperitur quae tuum decus similiter praecesserit aut sequatur sola placens singulariter Christo nulli compararis exemplo.

Then, with the joy of angelic discourse, the shepherds, who were the first to keep their flock during the night watches, recognized the born Lord, so that the shepherd of the world might be made known to the shepherds, and among the flocks, the lamb born would appear. Therefore, as the Gospel word testifies, proclaiming thus: "And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God and saying, 'Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace to men of good will.'" This shows the faithful assertion of the Evangelist concerning whose kingdom it is spoken of here, when the multitude of the heavenly host praises God in Christ so that, although the creation was human due to the condition of the mother, yet the shared communion with the deity demonstrates the Father to be known in the Son. Therefore, they said, "Glory to God in the highest," indeed, the glory of God remained in the highest, from whence Christ coming did not depart, "and on earth peace to men of good will." It is to be believed that "earth" refers to men, from whom we are, formed by the Lord who, reproving Adam, said, "For you are dust, and to dust you shall return." For then our earth deserved peace after that deadly war which fell when Christ assumed the earth of our flesh. For if in this place we should consider "earth" to mean fields and mountains, what peace can it have, or battles, the silent and sluggish masses against men? Therefore, that peace specifically descended upon those whom it found capable of good will, so that where it saw the endeavor of a sincere intention, the searcher of kidneys and hearts might be pleased to establish the dwelling of His abode. Peace is thus the better rationale of judgment against the spirit of the flesh, not to favor conflict, but to continuously preserve both matters in harmonious purity with the domination of the spirit. We should not distrust the weakness of the flesh so much that we seem to despair of heavenly help, for the Almighty Lord Jesus Christ, proven as the mediator of God and man, removes the excuse of our bodily frailty, seeking only the perfection of good work in our will, preserving it to His majesty. For the apostolic doctrine thus explains, saying, "The desire to do good is with me, but I do not find the ability to perform it," because, indeed, it is our part to want to do good; God's part is to perform, who pours His peace upon men of good will. The divine word then continues, saying:

Tunc angelici iucunditate sermonis pastores primi gregem suum nocturnis uigiliis reseruantes natum Dominum cognouerunt ut et pastoribus pastor mundi claresceret et inter greges agnus genitus appareret igitur ut euangelicus sermo testatur ita pronuntians et subito facta est cum angelo multitudo militiae caelestis laudantium Deum et dicentium gloria in altissimis Deo et in terra pax hominibus bonae uoluntatis ostendit Euangelistae fidelis assertio de cuius ageretur hic regno quando caelestis militae multitudo Deum laudat in Christo ut licet humana fuerit pro matris condicione creatio deitatis tamen una communio Patrem cognosci demonstret in Filio dicebant ergo gloria in altissimis Deo utique in altissimis gloria Dei permansit unde Christus ueniens non recessit et in terra pax hominibus bonae uoluntatis terram credendum est homines nuncupari de qua sumus Domino fabricante plasmati qui Adam increpans dixit quia terra es et in terram ibis tunc enim terra nostra pacem meruit post illud bellum ferale quo cecidit quando Christus terram nostrae carnis adsumpsit nam si terram in hoc loco campos arbitremur dictos et montes quam pacem potest habere uel praelia muta moles et pigra in homines ergo specialiter pax illa descendit quos bonae uoluntatis capaces inuenerit ut ubi studium sinceri propositi renum scrutator et cordis esse conspexerit illic domicilium suae delectetur instruere mansionis pax est enim et ratio melioris arbitrii contra spiritum carnis non fauere certamini sed utramque materiem concordi iugiter puritate cum spiritus dominatione seruare nec debemus tantum de carnis inbecillitate diffidere ut de caelesti uideamur auxilio desperare omnipotens enim Dominus Iesus Christus qui Dei mediator et hominis adprobatur ut excusationem nobis corporeae fragilitatis auferret studium nostrae tantum uoluntatis inquirens perfectionem boni operis suae maiestati seruauit apostolica namque doctrina sic explicat dicens uelle adiacet mihi perficere autem bonum non inuenio quia uidelicet nostrum est bonum uelle Dei perficere qui pacem suam hominibus bonae uoluntatis infundit diuinus deinde sermo prosequitur dicens:

Therefore, when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of King Herod, behold, magi from the east came to Jerusalem, saying, "Where is the one who has been born king of the Jews? For we have seen his star in the east and have come to worship him." Hearing this, King Herod was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him. And gathering all the chief priests and scribes of the people, he inquired of them where the Christ was to be born. They told him, "In Bethlehem of Judea, for thus it is written by the prophet: ‘And you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, are by no means least among the rulers of Judah; for from you shall come a ruler who will shepherd my people Israel.’" Then Herod secretly called the magi and learned from them the time of the star which had appeared to them. And sending them to Bethlehem, he said, "Go and search diligently for the child, and when you have found him, bring me word, that I too may come and worship him." Thus, in accordance with the scriptures, the birth of Christ shone forth from the east, because it fulfills what is indicated in the prayer of Zechariah: "The dawn from on high has visited us." For a similar theme is contained in the Psalm of David, "He has set his tabernacle in the sun," etc. By the sun, indeed, he signifies the east, from which region the day always arises. What then, Herod, do you cunningly contrive, why do you insanely rage? You profess Christ with your tongue but persecute Him in your heart, and you disguise your gloomy and darkly clouded mind with the serenity of a pleasant face. For you command that Christ be sought not to be worshipped with the religion you feign but to be killed with the plots you devise. You err greatly and are deceived, believing that He who first reigns in the royal seat might succeed you, who neither fully succeeds nor departs, but eternally possesses the throne of His majesty, and you disregard and neglect the law of the Law, threatening your kingdoms to the King of kings. This guilt lacks words, this treachery lacks an excuse. For you try to extinguish Him whom you had promised to worship. Perhaps you would have sinned less if you had not sought Christ at all, so that by pursuing Him only as an unknown man, you might not also appear sacrilegious to an offended God. Had you not read in the Davidic song thus warning, "Do not touch my anointed ones, and do my prophets no harm"? Therefore, since it is necessary to obey divine precept so that neither His anointed nor the prophets endure anything of malignity because it is a great sin to treat those consecrated with spiritual anointment with contempt, what name shall this crime have, to try to kill the very Lord Christ, from whom the anointed are named, the very true prophet from whom true prophecy descends, with your sly plots? Should you not have followed David, who served the commands of the Lord, who, when he entered the cave where Saul was hiding and was compelled to kill him, thus responded: "Far be it from me that I should do this thing to my lord, the anointed of the Lord, to stretch out my hand against him, for he is the anointed of the Lord." And indeed, he spared an enemy who wished to kill him, but you plot against the Lord who was born for the salvation of the world. Even if no old examples moved you to remember, at least for this, you should have laid down the weapons of parricidal intent, not to cast down the power of the scepter you wield, pursuing the author of the anointing. Lest the bloody treachery of your name depart satiated from such a great crime under the honor of a heavenly cross, but by the crime of your people to hell, which you, Herod, vainly raging, devise, another will see.

Cum ergo natus esset Iesus in Bethleem Iudae in diebus Herodis regis ecce magi ab oriente uenerunt Hierosolimam dicentes ubi est qui natus est rex Iudaeorum uidimus enim stellam eius in oriente et uenimus adorare eum audiens autem Herodes rex turbatus est et omnis Hierosolima cum illo et congregans omnes principes sacerdotum et scribas populi sciscitabatur ab eis ubi Christus nasceretur at illi dixerunt in Bethleem Iudae sic enim scriptum est per prophetam et tu Bethleem terra Iuda nequaquam minima es in principibus Iuda ex te enim exiet dux qui regat populum meum Israhel tunc Herodes clam uocatis magis didicit ab eis tempus stellae quae apparuit eis et mittens eos in Bethleem dixit ite et interrogate diligenter de puero et cum inueneritis renuntiate mihi ut et ego ueniens adorem eum conuenienter scripturarum sanctioni concordans Christi natiuitas ab oriente fulgebat quia implet quod Zachariae designat oratio uisitauit nos oriens ex alto nam et Dauiticus similia continet psalmus in sole posuit tabernaculum suum et cetera per solem uero significat orientem de qua regione semper oritur dies quid igitur Herodes astutius furis quid dementer insanis Christum siquidem lingua profiteris corde persequeris mentemque tetram et nebulosae caliginis obscuritate damnatam iucundi uultus serenitate dissimulas Christum namque mandas inquiri non adorandum religione quam fingis sed necandum fraudibus quas moliris erras nimis et falleris illum credens tibi succedere qui regia primus dominatur in sede qui nec succedit penitus nec decedit sed aeternus solium suae possidet maiestatis legemque legis ac neglegis qui regi regum tua regna minitaris caret uerbis haec culpa caret excusatione perfidia hunc enim conaris extinguere quem te promiseras adorare minus forte deliqueras si de Christo nihil quaereres quatenus homicida tantum uelut ignotum hominem persequendo non etiam sacrilegus esse Deo uidereris offenso nonne legeras eum Dauitico cantico sic monentem nolite tangere christos meos et in prophetis meis nolite malignari cum ergo diuinae praeceptioni parere necesse sit ut neque christi eius neque prophetae maligna quicquam inprobitate sustineant quia uidelicet spiritali consecratos unguento nefas grande sit contumeliose tractari quale nomen habebit hoc crimen ut ipsum Dominum Christum a quo christi sunt nuncupati ipsum uerum prophetam a quo uerax prophetia descendit tuis ambias dolis interfici nonne Dauid mandatis Domini seruientem debuisti sectari qui Saul in speluncam qua latebat ingressum dum cogeretur extinguere ita respondit absit a me omnino hoc mihi non contingat a Domino si fecero uerbum istud Domino meo christo Domini mei ut inferam manum meam in eum quoniam christus Domini hic est et ille quidem pepercit inimico se uolenti perimere tu autem insidiaris Domino qui mundi natus est ad salutem quodsi nullis ut immemor ueterum tangebaris exemplis ob hoc saltim parricidalis conatus debueras arma relinquere ne sceptri quod gerebas deiceres potestatem qui unctus agnosceris persequens unctionis auctorem ne tamen nominis tui cruenta perfidia tanti sceleris a satietate discedat sub honore crucis aetherio sed crimine tuae gentis inferno quod frustra saeuiens tu moliris Herodes alius post uidebit.

Therefore, following the Gospel, it says in this chapter: "When they had heard the king, they went on their way, and behold, the star that they had seen in the east went before them until it came to rest over the place where the child was. When they saw the star, they rejoiced with exceedingly great joy. And entering the house, they found the child with Mary his mother, and falling down they worshiped him. And opening their treasures, they offered him gifts, gold, frankincense, and myrrh." What does it mean that the star that they had seen should go before them, except that by observing the guidance of the small star, they might find the source of full light? They worshiped, however, because they truly came to worship what Herod, by lying, did not merit to obtain. For it is not granted to worship God except to true worshipers, as our Lord himself spoke to the Samaritan woman, saying, "You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews. But the hour is coming, and is now here, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth; for the Father seeks such as these to worship him." Therefore, although the words of the Lord’s teaching are manifest and open, that God is not worshiped except in truth, we must still more diligently scrutinize the force of the saying, "The hour is coming, and is now here, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth." I think, therefore, according to the sense that the Lord grants to my capacity, that by the indication of the present time in which He openly showed Himself to the world, He said the Father was to be worshiped in Himself. Thus, He disclosed in the following discourses, saying, "All judgment has been given to the Son, so that all may honor the Son, just as they honor the Father." Truly magnificent, after he said, "in spirit," he added, "and truth," because those who bear the Spirit of God follow truth, deceit accompanies the alien. Another mystery is revealed in the persona of these magi; through them, indeed, as Gentiles and strangers entering into His presence, our Lord Jesus Christ showed the grace of the future law, that He had already prepared access for all nations to come to Him. For thus He is known to have spoken both through His prophets and through Himself; indeed, although through the prophets He often predicted this, yet by the testimony of David He explained, "The Lord said to me, 'You are my Son; today I have begotten you. Ask of me, and I will give you the nations as your heritage and the ends of the earth as your possession.'" He said, "nations as your heritage," because by the grace of the new testament, the Lord was prepared to be acquired. But He Himself in the Gospel, as a good shepherd, thus promised, "I have other sheep that are not of this fold. I must bring them also, and they will hear my voice, and there will be one flock and one shepherd." Nor should we believe that the devotion of the gifts lacked divine guidance; for by those variously significant offerings, the power of Christ was declared. Let us inquire more closely what gold signifies, undoubtedly such excellent material and the brilliance of metallic luster, as befitting a king, is mentioned as brought to this king. But in this king, we acknowledge a dual substance; for Christ reigns spiritually in the heavens and was born carnally as the king of the Jews. However, the gift of frankincense, because it profited by religious offerings, that incense was given to Christ as to God. Myrrh, indeed, because it is suitable for burying bodies, is given to the one about to die in the flesh for burial to honor Him. The offering of the threefold quantity itself proclaimed the worship of the Catholic doctrine; from the number indeed, God Almighty, who sees the present, past, and future and always remains, has stayed continuously and will remain, of the triple power in His deity, in the course of time of all things laid the foundation, although the present always consists under His eyes, who neither accepted the old age of antiquity nor the growth of youth, but who always is the same, does not cease to be; for the name of His power, when Moses diligently inquired to announce to the people of Israel from the flame of the non-burning bush, issued this, "I am who I am," and said, "Thus you shall say to the children of Israel, 'I AM has sent me to you.'" In the Gospel, likewise, to the Jews setting themselves above Abraham by antiquity, He said, "Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am." See the distinction of both substances, discerning God and man. About Abraham, He said, "before he was," about Himself He did not say, "I was," but "I am," because to be of divinity is not to have been, which, always existing in living eternity, neither arises from beginnings nor is explained by ends; for time is from God, not God from time.

Euangelicum ergo sequens ait ita capitulum qui cum audissent regem abierunt et ecce stella quam uiderant in oriente antecedebat eos usque dum ueniens staret supra ubi erat puer uidentes autem stellam gauisi sunt gaudio magno ualde et intrantes domum inuenerunt puerum cum Maria matre eius et procidentes adorauerunt eum et apertis thesauris suis obtulerunt ei munera aurum tus et myrram quid est hoc ut praecederet eos stella quam uiderant nisi ut ducatum parui sideris intuentes materiem pleni luminis inuenirent adorauerunt autem quia uere uenerant adorare quod Herodes se mentiendo facturum non meruit obtinere nisi enim ueris adoratoribus Deum non conceditur adorare sicut ipse Dominus noster ad Samaritanam mulierem locutus est dicens uos adoratis quod nescitis nos adoramus quod scimus quia salus ex Iudaeis est sed uenit hora et nunc est quando ueri adoratores adorabunt Patrem in spiritu et ueritate nam et Pater tales quaerit qui adorent eum licet ergo Dominicae uerba doctrinae manifesta sint et aperta quod Deum nisi ueritas non adoret debemus tamen uim sermonis diligentius perscrutari quid sit uenit hora et nunc est quando ueri adoratores adorabunt Patrem in spiritu et ueritate arbitror itaque iuxta sensum quem meae Dominus paruitati largitur quod per significationem praesentis temporis quo se palam mundo monstrauit in se Patrem dixerit adorari sic enim sequentibus patefecit alloquiis dicens iudicium omne dedit Filio ut omnes honorificent Filium sicut honorificant Patrem magnifice uero postquam dixit in spiritu adiecit et ueritate quoniam spiritum Dei gerentes ueritas sequitur alienum fallacia comitatur declaratur et aliud in hac magorum persona mysterium per illos namque gentiles et aduenas ad se Dominus noster Iesus Christus ingressos gratiam futurae legis ostendit quod omnibus ad se gentibus ueniendi aditum iam pararit ita enim et per prophetas suos et per se ipsum noscitur elocutus per prophetas quidem licet saepius ista praedixerit Dauitico tamen testimonio sic explanauit Dominus dixit ad me Filius meus es tu ego hodie genui te postula a me et dabo tibi gentes hereditatem tuam et possessionem tuam terminos terrae mirabilem gentes hereditatem dixit quia per noui gratiam testamenti Domino parabatur adquiri per se autem ipsum in euangelio tam quam bonus pastor ita promisit et alias oues habeo quae non sunt ex hoc ouili et illas oportet me adducere et uocem meam audient et fiet unum ouile et unus pastor nec deuotionem munerum diuino caruisse nutu credamus nam per illas species merito uariae significationis oblatas Christi potentia patuit declarata aurum namque diligentius inquiramus quid pronuntiet adtributum sine dubio tam praeclara materies et opulentia metallici splendoris inradians utpote regi memoratur inlata sed et in hoc rege duplicem fatemur esse substantiam Christus enim et spiritaliter regnat in caelis et carnaliter natus est rex Iudaeis turis autem munus quia religioso libamini illud olim proficiebat incensum Christo datur ut Deo myrra uero quia tumulandis est apta corporibus humanam morituro per carnem sepulchralem traditur ad honorem ipsa quoque trinae quantitatis oblatio cultum catholici dogmatis pronuntiabat ex numero quippe Deus omnipotens qui praesentia praeterita conspicit ac futura semperque manet mansit iugiter ac manebit triplicis in sua deitate uirtutis in eorum temporum cursu rerum omnium posuit fundamentum quamquam praesentia sub eius oculis semper uniuersa consistant qui nec uetustatis senium nec iuuentutis suscepit incrementum sed qui semper quod est idem esse non desinit nam potestatis suae nomen excelsum Moysi sollicite perquirenti ut Israhel populo nuntiaret de flamma rubi non ardentis hoc edidit ego sum qui sum et dixit sic dices ad filios Israhel qui est misit me ad uos in euangelio nihilominus ad Iudaeos Abraham sibimet praeponentes antiquitate sic inquit amen amen dico uobis antequam Abraham fieret ego uide distantiam utriusque substantiae Deum discernentem et hominem de Abraham dixit antequam fieret de se ipso non dixit ego fui sed ego sum quoniam diuinitatis esse est non fuisse quae uiua semper aeternitate consistens nec initiis oritur nec terminis explicatur tempus enim a Deo est non Deus a tempore.

Therefore, the reading continues, and having received a warning in a dream not to return to Herod, they went back to their own country by another route. We must therefore imitate the faithful actions of the magi, and just as they believed in a dream, let us now believe in the clearest of visions, so that we who have deserved to find Christ shining forth with the sign of the cross and to worship him, and to offer from the treasures of our heart the threefold gifts of praise, should now by no means return to the prince of this world who had previously deceived us, but leaving the former path, let us proceed through the secret paths of him who directs our steps to the heavenly homeland of the trusting.

Lectionis itaque sermo prosequitur et responso accepto in somnis ne redirent ad Herodem per aliam uiam regressi sunt in regionem suam debemus igitur imitari nos etiam magorum facta fidelia et sicut illi somnio crediderunt nos euidentissimis aspectibus iam credamus quatenus qui Christum signo crucis praelucente repertum meruimus adorare eidemque de thesauris nostri cordis munera trinae laudis offerre iam minime reuertamur ad huius mundi principem qui nos ante seduxerat deceptorem sed priorem semitam relinquentes per illius callis secreta pergamus qui ad caelestem patriam gressus dirigit confidentum.

Then such events are narrated in sequence: then Herod, seeing that he had been tricked by the magi, was very angry, and sent and killed all the male children who were in Bethlehem and in all its borders from two years old and under, according to the time which he had determined from the magi. Therefore, the magi, whom he had believed to be deceived, having tricked him, the impious king, precipitated by anger, made public—if it is appropriate to call him a king who neither held piety nor restrained his own spirits but was like a most fierce and bloody lion to whom if a tender lamb could have been torn away would unleash ferocious assaults on the whole flock of little blood, and gnaw and tear and shred and extinguish the most tender flock. Standing afar, the most miserable mothers call out in vain to their already lost offspring, shaking the empty air with frequent bleatings. Thus, Herod, spurred on by Christ, did not cease to crush the groups of little ones with bloodstained tyranny. What crime, I ask, did the simple crowd succumb to death for? Why those who were just born are now deemed worthy of punishment? It is madness in the bloody king, not reason, who, hostile from the first cries and undertaking to commit innumerable atrocities, slaughtered thousands of children of one age and simultaneously bereaved so many mothers with a single mourning. One mother, tearing out her hair, distressed by the ugliness of the loss, was scratching her bare scalp; another, with her cheeks wet from tearful rains, was scoring them with the violence of her nails; another was beating her chest with bloodstained blows, the unhappy mother, no longer a mother, falling over the cold corpse of her only child, through the severed veins of the breasts, was pouring out a supply of milk mixed with blood. No one can set forth the so varied and so multiple images of that calamity where pain was present in diverse types of lamentations, not diverse. What was your feeling, or the intention of your mind, not now tyrant but butcher, what roars were you belching forth when ignited, observing from the high fortress the wounds of innocent children, you would see a vast sea of tears collected by the flood among the slaughtered infants who are certain to have fallen but not perished; although Christ was absent, he could not be away, who always engaged in the dangers of the saints, feels the torments inflicted on others’ bodies for himself through a pious motion.

Dehinc talia per ordinem gesta narrantur tunc Herodes uidens quoniam inlusus esset a magis iratus est ualde et mittens occidit omnes pueros qui erant in Bethleem et in omnibus finibus eius a bimatu et infra secundum tempus quod exquisierat a magis igitur a magis quos crediderat inludendos inlusus dissimulatos motus ira praecipiti rex impius publicauit si regem dici conueniat qui nec pietatem tenuit nec suos regens animos temperauit sed tamquam leo saeuissimus et cruentus cui si tener quiuerit forsan agnus auferri in totum parui sanguinis gregem impetus ferinos exercet pecusque mollissimum mandit lacerat decerpit extinguit stant eminus fetae miserrimae pignora uocantes frustra iam perdita crebrisque balatibus inanes auras exagitant sic Herodes Christo stimu latus ablato paruulorum cateruas elidere sanguinulenta non destitit tyrannide quonam rogo crimine simplex morti turba succumbit cur qui uixdum modo sunt geniti digni sunt iam puniri furor est in cruento rege non ratio qui primis uagitibus inimicus et innumerum patrare nefas adgressus puerilis milia mactauit aetatis unoque luctu tot simul genetrices orbauit haec effusam uultibus comam miseranda dilacerans crinalis damni foeditate nudum uerticem sauciabat illa madidas lacrimosis imbribus genas unguium proteruitate sulcabat duris alia pectus sanguinulenta uerberibus infelix mater nec iam mater super unici gelidum corruens cadauer extincti per abscisas uberum uenas lactis copiam cum cruore fundebat nemo calamitatis illius tam uarias tamque multiplices potest imagines expedire ubi diuersis generibus lamentorum dolor aderat non diuersus quis tibi sensus quaeue fuerit mentis intentio non iam tyranne sed lanio quos fremitus eructabas accensus cum insontium uulnera paruulorum ex arce summa prospiciens uastum pelagus lacrimarum cerneres inundatione collectum inter necatos tamen infantes quos occubuisse certum est non perisse quamquam Christus afuerit absens esse non potuit qui periculis sanctorum semper insertus alienis pro se corporibus inrogata pio motu sentit ipse supplicia.

And as he advanced in age, carrying two years over ten, of which number he had drawn the quantity from flesh, namely temporal age, running through by human reason, he revealed himself wiser than the elders in wisdom, a master to the masters in teaching, as the manifest interpreter of his law, to show how much greater he was.

Cumque iam aetate proficiens annos duos gereret supra decem cuius numeri de carne traxerat quantitatem aeuum scilicet temporale humana ratione percurrens senioribus seniorem sese prudentia magistris magistrum pandebat esse doctrina ut legis suae manifestus interpres quantus esset inferior demonstraret.

Nor after a long delay of times, what can be of times which, in their swift course, have not yet come and are already departing, as the evangelist indicates that Jesus himself was about thirty years old, as he was thought to be the son of Joseph, very excellently both words 'about' and 'thought' preserved his divinity. For just as he seemed about thirty years old when he is eternal, so he was thought to be the son of Joseph when he was born from a virgin. Then he approached the Jordan to be baptized, seeking what he had come to give, to be washed who had come to wash. John the Baptist, seeing him whom he had sensed in his mother's womb while he hid, now aware of the coming Christ, exercised the gift of prophecy, although he could not speak, descended from the temporary silence of a mute father, he began to proclaim and say, "Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world." When he says "takes away," he shows that he does not possess what he takes away, which indeed he took not to bear it himself but to destroy it, as we suddenly see the darkness of night blindness infused by the rising of the radiant day, and yet the light does not lose the grace of its brightness by the touch of the darkness it shakes off. Thus, the Lord Jesus Christ, taking on the sins of humanity, did not hold them but dispelled them, for as fire clarifies metals by consuming their dirt, so he, the good craftsman, cleansed us from the original contagion with his flame. Then, untainted, he entered the waters and washed our filth in himself, having nothing of his own to wash, and finally, by the majesty of his holy body, he purified and blessed the very waters, enhancing the reputation of the gushing torrent with the honor of the Lord's baptism. The waters felt the tremendous presence of deity; the sea withdrew from the shore, the river returned to its source, about which the prophet, singing these things, indicates, "The sea saw and fled; Jordan was turned back." What is it, sea, that you fled, and you, Jordan, why were you turned back?

Nec post longam temporum moram quaenam potest esse temporibus quae uolucri cursu fugacia nondum ueniunt iam recedunt ut euangelista significat ipse lesus erat quasi annorum triginta ut putabatur filius Ioseph praeclare nimis utrumque uerbum quasi et putabatur diuinitati seruauit sicut enim quasi triginta uidebatur annorum cum sit aeternus ita Ioseph filius putabatur cum sit ex uirgine procreatus tunc Iordanis ad fluenta baptizandus accessit expetens quod uenerat ut donaret abluendus qui uenerat abluere hunc Iohannes Baptista conspiciens quem matris in utero senserat dum lateret iam Christi conscius adfuturi prophetiae munus exercens licet loqui non posset s tamquam muti patris a silentio temporali descendens proclamare coepit et dicere ecce Agnus Dei qui tollit peccatum mundi cum dicit tollit ostendit eum non habere quod tollit quod quidem tulit non ut ipse gereret sed ut ipse deperderet sicut tenebris nocturnae caecitatis ortum radiantis diei subito uidemus infundi nec tamen caliginis tactu quam decutit splendoris sui gratiam lux amittit ita Dominus Iesus Christus humani generis delicta suscipiens non tenuit sed fugauit nam ut ignis metalla sordium consumptione clarificat ita nos ab originali contagione sua bonus opifex flamma mundauit tunc inmaculatus aquas ingressus in se nostram lauauit inluuiem nihil habens proprium quod lauaret ipsos denique latices sacri corporis maiestate purificans beauit gurgitis famam honorem Dominici baptismatis consecutam senserunt tremendam deitatis undae praesentiam pontus recessit a litore fluuius remeauit in fontem de quibus propheta cantitans haec designat mare uidit et fugit Iordanis conuersus est retrorsum quid est mare quia fugisti et tu Iordanis quia conuersus es retrorsum.

Therefore, the text of the gospel reading continues thus: but after being baptized, he immediately came up from the water, and behold, the heavens were opened, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove coming upon him, and behold, a voice from the heavens saying, "This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased." Let us consider more attentively how much mystery is revealed even in this place. After the Lord ascended from the water after being baptized, the heavens were opened immediately. How were they opened immediately with Christ, for whom above the stars is always home, the heaven seems never to be closed? But I suppose, as much as his piety deigns to aspire to my senses, that then the heavens were opened when the Lord ascended from the water after being baptized, that he might teach by his merciful examples to man, whose image he assumed, that the kingdoms of heaven are then revealed when one has deserved to be drenched by the consecration of spiritual water. But that the Spirit of God descended upon him in the form of a dove shows how great his goodness, gentleness, simplicity, through a bird having no bitterness of gall. And lest he be physically unseen, God is asserted by the voice of the Father, saying, "This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased." This remarkable affection of love contains the full firmness of catholic doctrine and pronounces one power of the Father and the Son. For charity, which consists in God, does not depart from the spirit of likeness and equality, for he who commanded by his law, 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself,' taught that there should be no distance between the loving and the beloved. For also in the subsequent word that he added, "in whom I am well pleased," it is understood to have explained the power of one deity in common. For it is more to have said 'I am well pleased' than 'I pleased,' because 'I am well pleased' is a word of congruence and is seen to adhere to two persons, which is why the heavenly voice expressed it, that both the Father in the Son and the Son seem to have been well pleased in the Father, for even by the very gathering together of the Paternal voice, the Son's baptism, or the Spirit flying down, the trinity shone from one God, who does not deserve to exist who has not counted the unity.

Euangelicae lectionis ergo textus ita prosequitur baptizatus autem confestim ascendit de aqua et ecce saperti sunt caeli et uidit Spiritum Dei descendentem sicut columbam uenientem super se et ecce uox de caelis dicens hic est Filius meus dilectus in quo mihi bene conplacui consideremus attentius quantum reueletur et in hoc loco mysterium postquam enim Dominus de aqua baptizatus ascendit mox aperti sunt caeli quomodo mox aperti cum Christo cui super sidera semper est domus numquam caelum uideatur obclusum sed arbitror quantum pietas eius meis sensibus adspirare dignatur quod ideo tunc aperti sunt caeli quando Dominus ab aqua baptizatus ascendit ut suis misericors doceret exemplis homini cuius effigiem sumpsit caelorum regna tunc pandi cum meruerit spiritalis aquae consecratione perfundi quod autem Spiritus Dei super eum in specie columbae descendit ostenditur quanta sit eius bonitas mansuetudo simplicitas per uolucrem fellis amaritudinem non habentem et ne corporaliter uisus esse nesciretur Deus uoce Patris asseritur dicentis hic est Filius meus dilectus in quo mihi conplacui praeclarus iste dilectionis affectus plenam catholici dogmatis continet firmitatem unamque Patris et Filii pronuntiat esse uirtutem. caritas enim quae in Deo consistit a similitudinis et aequalitatis spiritu non recèdit nam qui dixit sui lege mandati diliges proximum tuum tamquam te ipsum docuit diligentis et dilecti nullam fieri oportere distantiam nam et in sequenti uerbo quod addidit in quo mihi conplacui intellegitur potestatem unius deitatis explanasse communem plus est enim conplacui dixisse quam placui quia conplacui conuenientiae uerbum est et geminae cernitur adhaerere personae quod ideo uox caelestis expressit ut et Pater in Filio et Filius conplacuisse uideatur in Patre nam et ipso tam Paternae uocis quam Filii baptismatis uel Spiritus aduolantis congregato consortio trinitas uno fulsit ex Deo quo dignus non meretur existere qui non numerauerit uni tatem.

Then Jesus was led by the Spirit into the desert to be tempted by the devil. And after fasting forty days and forty nights, he was hungry. And the tempter came and said to him, "If you are the Son of God, command these stones to become loaves of bread." Therefore, he was tempted by the devil, always the enemy of faith. For no one scrutinizes a thing made evident to themselves unless filled with deceitful skill, they do not believe in the known truth, just as the devil himself, who after recognizing Jesus as the Son of God by the clarity of the paternal word, and fearing his unique power after forty days and nights of not eating—although Moses and Elijah had similarly sustained fasting for so many days and nights, but he knew these had done so with external support, although by their own merit. Jesus, he saw, performed this by his own power, and suddenly seized the most vain hope of foolish temptation, because the Lord was hungry and he dared not approach the divinity unless he saw it mixed with man. Soon, plotting ancient snares of food, he raised wicked tricks of deceit, showing the accustomed, and the serpent said, "If you are the Son of God, command these stones to become loaves of bread," as if he could not do this, who continually performs such a work, producing crops from the rocky bowels of the earth, pregnant with frugal sustenance and dense with the bounty of harvests, providing abundant food from the fecundity of stones. But the unique wisdom preferred to despise the glory of the miraculous deed, so as not to admit a repetition of the temptation. For God accepts those who believe and excludes those who tempt. For the people of Israel are read to have offended God primarily because, having forgotten his benefits, they dared to tempt him, and with desperation, they demanded a feast, about which both Moses in his books did not keep silent about their disbelief, and David, briefly mentioning, explained, "They tempted God in their hearts by asking for food for their souls, and spoke ill of God, saying, 'Can God prepare a table in the desert?' and so on. For what can be difficult for him who, for the immense possibility of all things, is called omnipotent?" Therefore, the Lord responded to Satan, saying, "It is written, 'Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.'" A very fitting and competent response was given to the enemy, for to the one asking if he were the Son of God, he responded as a man, that he might rather be overcome by him whom he seemed to have attacked. Upon hearing this, broken and weak, yet he did not put down the weapons of audacity, and the devil led him and showed him all the kingdoms of the earth in a moment of time and said to him, "I will give you all this power and glory, for it has been given to me, and to whomever I wish I give it. Therefore, if you worship before me, all shall be yours." What wonder if the wretched one spoke perverse things, who, not walking the straight paths, took on the form of a twisted serpent, considering Christ to be touched by greed for a fragile and perishable kingdom, who rather had come to bestow strength and eternity, or that he, who had come to teach that worldly riches perish, should deign to acquire secular riches and worship a monster thrown down from heaven, to whom the throne is heaven, the earth a footstool, the whole world in obedience, whom no one dares to look at and all powers praise with subdued voices above the stars. But again, the Lord confounds him with such a response, saying, "It is written, 'You shall worship the Lord your God, and him only shall you serve.'" Still, he is seen to respond from the human person, deigning not to subjugate the weak rebel by the power of greater might, although even this word's envious viper-like hostility, struck by the encounter of God, had not yet laid aside the character of rashness, but, confident in the triple shaking of tongues, against the victorious hand of the Trinity, he raises his wounded head a third time. Then the devil took him to the holy city and set him on the pinnacle of the temple and said to him, "If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down, for it is written, 'He will command his angels concerning you,' and 'on their hands, they will bear you up, lest you strike your foot against a stone.'" Oh how much blindness and darkness always dominate in the black breast, and the mind, obscure with the darkness of its own malignity, does not know how to keep deceit undetected. Behold, saying, "If you are the Son of God," he shows that he does not know this, while asking he admits, "He has commanded his angels concerning you," he confesses this to be he whom he sees, but using the ambiguity of varied speech, found to be a liar and a dissembler, he is approved in his own arts, not only of deceit but also of folly. For what could be more inept than to believe that he, although from the high summit of the temple's pinnacle and the height of the lofty pinnacle, should fear a precipitous leap, who seemed to walk plainly on earth from the highest arch of the heavens, about whom shouting David says, "He bowed the heavens and came down," containing the lowest and not leaving the highest. Therefore, speaking thus, the divine voice struck the failing audacity, "It is written, 'You shall not tempt the Lord your God.'" Here the Lord and God himself, now revealing himself, thus prohibits further attempts by the tempter, admonishing us by his examples, the pious teacher, that the spirit of ancient malignity undoubtedly lies under human virtues where God is infused into the simplicity of a pure heart.

Tunc Iesus ductus est in desertum a spiritu ut temptaretur a diabolo et cum ieiunasset quadraginta diebus et quadraginta noctibus postea esuriit et accedens ad eum temptator dixit ei si Filius Dei es dic ut lapides isti panes fiant igitur temptabatur a diabolo fidei semper inimico nemo enim manifestam sibi rem discutit nisi qui fallaci plenus ingenio compertae ueritati non credit sicut ipse diabolus qui postea quam Iesum paterni claritate sermonis Dei Filium esse cognouit eiusdemque potentiam singularem quadraginta diebus et quadraginta noctibus nihil uescentis expauit licet Moyses similiter et Helias totidem dierum sustinuerint noctiumque ieiunium sed illos alieno fultos auxilio quamquam suo merito nouerat haec fecisse Iesum propria cernebat operari uirtute spem repente uanissimam stultae temptationis arripuit quia Dominus esuriuit nec audebat adgredi diuinitatem nisi mixtum uideret hominem mox antiquas molitus insidias ciborum inprobos dolos fallacia suscitauit adsueta demonstransque lapides suas magis epulas serpens ait si filius Dei es dic ut lapides isti panes fiant quasi non posset hoc facere qui tale iugiter opus exercens de saxeis terrae uisceribus producit segetem frugali uictu praegnantem et spicea messium densitate cautis nutrimento crescente panis uberem cibum de lapidum fecunditate largitur sed maluit sapientia singularis gloriam mirabilis facti contemnere ne repetitionem temptationis admitteret Deus enim credentes suscipit temptantes excludit nam populus Israhel ob hoc legitur Deum offendisse quam maxime quia beneficiorum eius oblitus temptare ausus est eum ut cum desperatione peteret epulatum de quorum et Moyses in libris suis incredulitate non tacuit et Dauid ita memorans breuiter explanauit et temptauerunt Deum in cordibus suis ut peterent escas animabus suis et male locuti sunt de Deo et dixerunt numquid poterit Deus parare mensam in deserto et cetera quid enim illi potest esse difficile qui pro inmensa rerum omnium possibilitate uocatur omnipotens respondens ergo Dominus Satanae sic dixit scriptum est non in solo pane uiuit homo sed in omni uerbo quod procedit de ore Dei apta nimis et competens data est inimico responsio nam percunctanti si filius Dei esset uelut homo respondit quatenus per eum potius uinceretur quem uidebatur adgressus quo audito fractus et debilis arma tamen audaciae non deponit et duxit illum diabolus et ostendit illi omnia regna orbis terrae in momento temporis et ait ei tibi dabo potestatem hanc uniuersam et gloriam illorum quia mihi tradita sunt et cui uolo do illa tu ergo si adoraueris coram me erunt tua omnia quid mirum si peruersa locutus est miser qui ne rectas uias incederet serpentis torti sumpsit effigiem regni fragilis et caduci Christum aestimans cupiditate contingi qui ualidum potius et aeternum suis uenerat conlaturus aut ille diuitias dignaretur saeculares adquirere qui docere uenerat perirent monstrumque caelo deiectum adoraret cui thronus est caelum terra subpedaneum mundus omnis obsequium quem nullus audet aspicere et cunctae submissis uocibus laudant super sidera potestates at iterum Dominus eum tali responsione confundit dicens scriptum est Dominum Deum tuum adorabis et illi soli seruies adhuc ex humana cernitur respondere persona dedignatus scilicet infirmum rebellem uirtute maioris potentiae subiugare licet huius quoque uerbi liuor ille uipereus congressione deiectus nondum posuerit temeritatis ingenium sed trisulca linguarum uibratione confidens contra uictricem Trinitatis manum tertio caput erigit sauciatum tunc assumpsit eum diabolus in sanctam ciuitatem et statuit eum supra pinnaculum templi et dixit ei si filius Dei es mitte te deorsum scriptum est enim quia angelis suis mandauit de te et in manibus tollent te ne forte offendas ad lapidem pedem tuum o quantum caecitatis atque caliginis nigro semper dominatur in pectore mensque tenebris propriae malignitatis obscura nescit indeprehensam custodire fallaciam ecce dicens si filius Dei es ostendit hoc se nescire cum quaerit dicens iterum angelis suis mandauit de te confitetur hunc esse quem cernit sed ancipitis usus uarietate sermonis simulator ac dissimulator inuentus mendax suis artibus adprobatur nec solius fallaciae sed etiam stultitiae domus est cor malignum quid enim poterit ineptius repperiri quam ut illum crederet licet alta sublimis templi fastigia et cacumen excelsi pinnaculi saltu formidare prae cipiti qui ut planis uideretur in terris de summa caelorum arce descendit de quo clamans Dauid dicit et inclinauit caelos et descendit simul humillima continens et altissima non relinquens igitur deficientis audaciam sic eloquens perculit uox diuina scriptum est non temptabis Dominum Deum tuum hic Dominum Deumque sese iam pandens tales ergo ultra conatus adsumere prohibet temptatorem suis nos ammonens pius doctor exemplis spiritum uetustae malignitatis artificem illic humanis procul dubio subiacere uirtutibus ubi fuerit Deus simplicitati puri cordis infusus.

Therefore, the instruction of the reading says that then the devil left him, and behold, angels came and ministered to him. It seems to me, as I judge in this retreat of the fleeing devil and the subsequent angelic ministry, to declare a certain image of Paschal glory by preceding signs. For just as, after the temptations were overcome and the devil was driven away, the angels provided ministry to the Savior, so, after the insults of the Jews and the pains of the blessed passion of the cross were despised, and the devil's fruit, death, was trampled, he rose from the dead, was carried to the stars, and Christ is adored by angels in heaven with the usual command of majesty.

Ait ergo lectionis instructio tunc reliquit eum diabolus et ecce angeli accesserunt et ministrabant ei uidetur ut arbitror in hoc diaboli fugientis abscessu et ministerio consequenter angelico quandam paschalis gloriae declarare praecedentibus signis imaginem nam sicut uictis temptationibus depulsoque diabolo praebuerunt angeli ministerium Saluatori sic contumeliis Iudaeorum et poenis beata crucis passione contemptis ipsaque diaboli fructu morte calcata surrexit ab inferis euectus est astris et consueto maiestatis imperio Christus ab angelis adoratur in caelo.

From there, he associated with himself some disciples from fishermen, who were henceforth to fish for human souls, which, following the slippery joy of the world, wandered through uncertain paths of the swaying bridge, wavering through voluptuous slips on wandering courses. And such he reconciled to eternal life, whom neither noble lineage by birth of earthly nobility could inflate nor the brilliance of learned eloquence could raise with the glory of vain chatter, but whom the holy institution of a simple life would make conspicuous by too much pride in humility, now made near to heaven. For Almighty God chose rather the foolish things of the world and the weak, rejecting those things that seem wise and strong, because, as Paul the apostle, an excellent teacher, writes, "What is foolish of God is wiser than men, and what is weak of God is stronger than men." And he immediately said again, "God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; and God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong; and the base things of the world and the despised, God chose, and the things that are not, as though they are, to destroy the things that are." Moreover, desiring to provide swift salvation mercifully, the Savior also established the mode of praying and the prayers, and the most pious judge briefly wants to be asked so that he may more quickly consent to the supplicant. Thus, he taught to pray, thus giving honor to his own Father, indeed for our nature, but for grace for men, bestowing his own unique prerogative to all as a granted gift.

Exin discipulos ex piscatoribus quosdam sibimet sociauit accitos humanas deinceps animas piscaturos quae lubricam sectantes mundi laetitiam tamquam natantes uias ponti fluctuantis incertas per uoluptuosos lapsus uagis cursibus errauerunt talesque uitae conciliauit aeternae quos nec generosa prosapies ortu terrenae nobilitatis inflaret nec nitor eruditae facundiae gloria uanae garrulitatis extolleret sed quos sanctum uitae simplicis institutum superba nimis humilitate conspicuos caelo faceret iam uicinos namque Deus omnipotens stulta mundi potius elegit et infirma rennuens quae sapientia uidentur et fortia quia sicut scribit Paulus apostolus doctor egregius quod stultum est Dei sapientius est hominibus et inbecille Dei fortius est hominibus et confestim iterum dixit quae stulta sunt huius mundi elegit Deus ut confundat sapientes et infirma mundi elegit Deus ut confundat fortia et ignobilia et contemptibilia mundi elegit Deus et quae non Sunt tamquam quae sunt ut ea quae sunt destrueret quin etiam salutem celerem misericors cupiens adhibere Saluator orandi quoque modum precesque constituit iudexque piissimus breuiter uult rogari quo citius annuat supplicanti sic orandum ergo docuit patrem suum scilicet pro natura nostrum uero pro gratia honorem proprium largitus hominibus ut quod solus habet egregium cunctis donaret indultum.

OUR FATHER WHO ART IN HEAVEN, who reigns perpetually in the heavens, whose name we dare to call the Father, first we must note that the gift of such a great blessing is attributed not separately to each individual, but communally to all. For although one might be remote from others and dwell secretly in secluded places, each one should implore the Lord with the words of this prayer, not saying "My Father" but "Our Father," because this term is due solely to Christ, whose father is properly God. Although this is inscribed in all the gospels, in that place specifically, the Lord Jesus himself taught his singular power distinct from common mix, where he comforted the disciples saying, "I go to my Father and your Father." What he said as "my" he rightly claimed for his special glory, and what he said as "your" he revealed as a general grace commonly to all. And since it is written, "Let earthly things teach you about heavenly," let us make some comparison here, so that from human we may grasp divine. Let us suppose, therefore, a noble man who has an only son and some servants; can there be, because he is called the head of the household, an equal condition of love at his side between the servants and the son, when the son himself is proven to be lord of all? Thus, we use this prayer, not Christ, since with this supplication we also beseech him who with the father is one Lord, coeternal. Therefore, saying "our father," we confess that we all exist as brothers in him, whose name's affection we must not spurn by expulsion of mutual charity, nor follow the monuments of original hatred, by which Cain, the shedder of his brother's blood, became the originator of parricidal stain. Rather, fervent with the spirit of gentleness, let us put aside carnal wickedness of oldness and rejoice, clad in the new man, lest when works degenerate from heavenly to earthly, we seem unworthy of such a father, who with Christ as our guide has received us born into sacred adoption.

PATER NOSTER QVI ES IN CAELIS qui caelorum perpetem regnatorem patris audemus nomine nuncupare primum debemus aduertere non separatim singulis sed communiter uniuersis donum tanti muneris adtributum nam quamuis semotus a ceteris et secretioribus habitans latenter in locis Dominum quilibet uerbis huius orationis imploret non inquiet Pater meus sed Pater noster quoniam soli Christo debetur hoc uerbum cuius proprie pater est Deus quamquam enim in omnibus euangeliis hoc habeatur adscriptum in illo tamen euidenter Dominus Iesus ipse capitulo iuris sui potentiam singularem docuit a populari permixtione discretam ubi discipulos confortabat haec alloquens uado ad Patrem meum et Patrem uestrum quod ait meum hanc sibi specialem gloriam congrue uindicauit quod ait uestrum generalem gratiam communiter cunctis esse patefecit et quoniam scriptum est doceant uos terrena quae sunt caelestia similitudinem faciamus hic aliquam ut ex humanis diuina capiamus ponamus igitur quempiam nobilem uirum cui Filius unicus et aliquanti sint famuli numquid ob hoc quia pater familias adpellatur potest apud eum seruorum ac filii par dilectionis esse condicio cum et ipse filius dominus probetur esse cunctorum nos igitur utimur hac oratione non Christus quoniam prece huius supplicationis ipsum quoque deposcimus qui cum patre unus est Dominus coaeternus dicentes igitur pater noster confitemur nos omnes in ipso fratres existere cuius nominis non debemus affectum mutuae caritatis expulsione contemnere nec originalis odii monumenta sectari quo Cain germani sanguinis fusor parricidalis maculae factus est inchoator sed mansueti spiritus igne feruentes carnalis ponamus nequitiam uetustatis et nouo homine gratulemur induti ne cum coeperint a caelestibus opera degenerare terrena tanto patre uideamur indigni qui Christo nos duce sacra natos adoptione suscepit.

HALLOWED BE THY NAME, a sanctification which can be considered whereby the Lord, who sanctifies all, may himself be hallowed, except that we prepare for his entry a pious, gentle, peaceful, and chaste heart, so that, delighted with such a dwelling, he might work in us an increase of his sanctification, as our Lord Jesus Christ himself recalls having been glorified in his disciples, who always shone with the clear light of divinity. For in the Gospel according to John, praying for his disciples among various things he pursued, he says, "And I have been glorified in them," precisely because he found his glory in them. Where, therefore, he finds signs of his sanctification, he declares his sanctification there. For that most gentle piety without measure declares that it grants to itself whatever it bears fruit in its servants. Likewise, the understanding is shown and as he commands himself to be blessed when he rather blesses all things. For the general hymn proclaims that the Lord be blessed by every creature in order, as sung by the three youths in the furnace.

SANCTIFICETVR NOMEN TVVM sanctificatio quae potest aestimari qua Dominus sanctificari ualeat qui cuncta sanctificat nisi ut cor pium mite placidum castum ad eius praeparemus ingressum quatenus tali domicilio delectatus sanctificationis suae in nobis operetur augmentum quemadmodum ipse Dominus noster Iesus Christus in discipulis se clarificatum esse memorat qui clara semper diuinitatis luce fulgebat nam in euangelio secundum Iohannem pro discipulis supplicat patri inter diuersa quae prosecutus est uerba sic inquit et clari ficatus sum in eis scilicet quia claritatem suam in eis inuenit ubi ergo et sanctificationis suae signa reppererit sanctificare se ibidem dicit pietas enim illa sine modo mitissima sibi conferri pronuntiat quicquid suis famulis ipsa fructificat similis itaque sensus ostenditur et ut se benedici praecipiat cum ipse potius uniuersa benedicat namque trium puerorum in camino canentium ab omni creatura per ordinem benedicendum Dominum generalis hymnus exclamat.

THY KINGDOM COME, we pray for the kingdom of the ruler who never ceases to reign, to punish the deceitful prince of this world for his presumed tyranny, and alone, who alone is, to demonstrate his own dominion, neither conscious of death nor to be consumed by times. For the time of that light is a day continuous without night, where the mightiest soldier, having adored Christ, after various battles of the world and emerging victorious, will rejoice with the crown adorning the hair of the blessed head, the honor of perpetual nobility.

ADVENIAT REGNVM TVVM regnum aduenire deposcimus regnatoris qui regnare non desinit ut fallacem huius mundi principem pro praesumpta puniat tyrannide solusque qui solus est suum demonstret imperium nec morti conscium nec temporibus consumendum nescit etenim tempus lucis illius dies nocte continuus ubi fortissimus miles adorato Christo diuersa mundi post praelia uictor existens caesariem beati capitis ornatura perpetuae nobilitatis gratulabitur iam corona.

THY WILL BE DONE, ON EARTH AS IT IS IN HEAVEN, it seems here too that the sense of continuity is to be understood in that we must continually day and night implore through prayers that His will be fulfilled in heaven and on earth, He who nowhere permits wickedness. Where the devil, cast down from heaven, nor should he infest the earth, nor should the savage serpent assault our earthly body's substance, as if concreted from clay, as food for its voracity, and entwine us in the worst persuasions with scaly binds, and ambush until by deadly poisons, it consumes our miserable life by licking. Therefore, we should incessantly implore the Lord to likewise protect the soul and flesh within us, for we are part of heaven and also from the earth we exist as seed.

FIAT VOLVNTAS TVA SICVT IN CAELO ET IN TERRA praecedentis et hic continentiae sensus uidetur intellegi quod iugibus dies noctesque precibus debeamus exposcere ut illius caelum terramque uoluntas adimpleat qui nusquam uult esse nequitiam quo deiectum caelo diabolum nec terrae patiatur infestum nec terrenam corporis nostri substantiam tamquam limo concretam saeuus coluber ut escam suae uoracitatis inuadat ac pessimis nos suasionibus inuolutos squamosis nexibus amplectatur et ambiat donec letalibus uenenis inebrians miserabilem uitam lambendo consumat ideoque Dominum deprecemur assidue ut animam in nobis pariter tueatur et carnem altera namque caeli pars sumus altera terrae semen existimus.

GIVE US THIS DAY OUR DAILY BREAD, to those asking for daily sustenance, a threefold sense of understanding opens, although the divine scriptures should be observed by all accordingly. Literally, we seem to ask for the bread of the grain for eating, and morally, as servants, we pray to the Lord that we may deserve the daily grain, while knowing that both forms of reasoning come from spiritual discipline. For this reason, we are commanded to ask for daily sustenance so that we do not reserve anything for tomorrow, appearing to doubt divine piety, which yet is proven so laborious and arduous that only a few rare men can maintain such a rule. For the Lord Himself, faithful in all, who led the children of Israel out of Egypt through many years in the barren wilderness, sparing only with Sabbath food, governed daily meals. He promised this also to us, if faith does not fail, committing in the evangelical sayings, addressing His disciples among other teachings, "Do not be anxious for tomorrow; for tomorrow will be anxious for itself." If we wish to understand more fully the spiritual words we are discussing, we will feel that this bread is the divine word, whose substantial doctrine, if the mind remains even a little vacant or fasting, will endure great hunger. Indeed, there is no small distance between spiritual and bodily feasts. We are never instructed to refuse the former, while eating the latter more sparingly is healthful abstinence, there it becomes vital greed. Finally, David, meditating on the Lord's law day and night, declares happiness in these words: "Blessed is the man who walks not in the counsel of the wicked, nor stands in the way of sinners, nor sits in the seat of the scornful, but his delight is in the law of the Lord, and on his law he meditates day and night." For this meditation very much satiates and delights as the sweetness of thick honey, which, although it quickly fills the eating belly, its nectar-like sweetness is never found disagreeable by nature. Let us hear also what the same prophet says: "How sweet are your words to my taste, O Lord, sweeter than honey and the honeycomb to my mouth." He perfectly defined the words of the law as food, saying they are sweet to the mouth, not to the ears, and that honey and the honeycomb are administered to the mouth, not to the hearing. For even the deaf, who are least helped by hearing, are filled through the office of the mouth by reading heavenly commands. Similarly, the Apostle to the Corinthians showed by his letter that spiritual feasts are teaching, saying, "And I, brethren, could not speak to you as to spiritual, but as to carnal, as to babes in Christ. I fed you with milk, not with solid food; for you were not yet able. Who would doubt or question, please, that all these things are figuratively spiritual, for neither were they infants nor did they take nourishment of milk from the apostle, which even a fool might think, but they were beginning to draw the words of the law and gradually be imbued with divine teachings, to drink like infants the beginnings of milk. It befits us to know that as nourishing food is good teaching, so harmful is malign teaching. Therefore, the Lord warned the disciples to particularly beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and the Sadducees, knowing that the virus of sour doctrine could corrupt the richness of all sweetness with a small touch, since according to what the same Apostle Paul says, "A little leaven leavens the whole lump." For although we may believe the body of our Lord Jesus Christ to be this bread, from a spiritual reason it is by no means known to deviate, especially since such eating or such speech is given not to any Gentiles, not to any Jews, but solely to Christians divinely taught.

PANEM NOSTRVM COTIDIANVM DA NOBIS HODIE panis alimoniam cotidiani petentibus tripartitus intellegentiae sensus aperitur quamquam scripturas diuinas sic oporteat omnes aduerti ergo et secundum litteram specialiter frumentarii germinis panem uescendi uidemur gratia postulare et moraliter ut serui Dominum deprecamur quo diurnam consequi mereamur annonam dum tamen utriusque rationis formam de spiritali nouerimus procedere disciplina ob hoc enim epulas uictuales cotidie iubemur exposcere ne quid in crastinum reseruantes de diuina cernamur dubitare pietate quod tamen ita laboriosum probatur et arduum ut a paucis uiris atque raris simis talis queat regula custodiri namque Dominus ipse fidelis in omnibus qui filios Israhel productos ex Aegypto per annos in eremi sterilitate quam plurimos sabbatico tantum cibo parcentes cotidianis dapibus gubernauit hoc et nobis si fides non deficiat se daturum euangelicis sermonibus compromisit alloquens suos ita discipulos inter alia quae docebat nolite ergo solliciti esse in crastinum crastinus enim dies sollicitus erit sibi ipse si uero plenius spiritaliter dicta de quibus loquimur uelimus agnoscere sentiemus hunc panem diuinum esse sermonem cuius substantiali doctrina si uacans animus uel paululum ieiunus remanet magnae famis penuriam sustinebit distantia siquidem non pusilla inter spiritales epulas et corporales existit has etenim parcius edere illas numquam praecipimur recusare hic abstinentia salubris illic auiditas fit uitalis denique Dauid meditationem Dominicae legis exercenti die ac nocte beatitudinem his uerbis praedicat inhaerere beatus uir qui non abiit in consilio impiorum et in uia peccatorum non stetit et in cathedra pestilentiae non sedit sed in lege Domini uoluntas eius et in lege eius meditabitur die ac nocte haec enim meditatio nimium saturat et delectat tamquam mellis crassi dulcedo quae licet aluum cito uescentis adimpleat nectarea tamen suauitate naturae numquam probatur horrere audiamus hinc etiam idem propheta quid dicat quam dulcia faucibus meis eloquia tua Domine super mel et fauum ori meo perfecte uerba legis cibum definiuit intellegi cum faucibus dulcia dicit esse non auribus et super mel et fauum ori non auditui ministrari nam et surdi quibus auditus minime suffragatur praeceptis caelestibus per oris officium legentes implentur similiter et apostolus ad Corinthios usus epistola manifestauit spiritales epulas esse doctrinam dicens et ego fratres non potui uobis loqui quasi spiritalibus sed quasi carnalibus quasi infantibus in Christo lac uobis potum dedi non cibum nondum enim poteratis quis dubitet quaeso uel ambigat haec omnia spiritaliter figurata neque enim fuisse illos infantes aut lactis ab apostolo nutrimenta sumpsisse uel stultus poterit aliquis arbitrari sed incipientes uerba legis haurire ac paulatim diuinis imbui institutis lactea uelut infantes bibere primordia scire nos conuenit quia sicut salutaris cibus est bona doctrina sic noxius est maligna ideo Dominus discipulos ammonebat a fermento Pharisaeorum et Sadducaeorum specialiter se cauere sciens acidi dogmatis uirus totius dulcedinis ubertatem paruo tactu corrumpere quoniam secundum quod ait idem Paulus apostolus modicum fermenti totam massam corrumpit nam etsi corpus Domini nostri Iesu Christi magis esse credamus hunc panem ab spiritali nihilominus ratione nequaquam noscitur declinare maxime quia talis epulatio uel talis oratio nulli gentilium nulli Iudaeorum nisi solis diuinitus traditur Christianis.

AND FORGIVE US OUR DEBTS, AS WE ALSO HAVE FORGIVEN OUR DEBTORS If we measure the wishes of our petition more carefully, we recognize that forgiveness should be granted to us or denied based on our own examples, for we are commanded by the Lord to hope for what we have been seen to forgive a fellow servant, being bound by the same condition of being debtors as we neither wish to be nor desire to have others in debt. For in the person of others we are either absolved or bound. If it seems uncertain about which debtors this refers to, we must consider the matter of a weak excuse, and whether perhaps in fault or money or in whatever matter you, brother, have been accused, relax it, for we too are shown by frequent presumptions of sins and dishonest handling of monetary amounts to be entangled in many bonds before God. Whoever has been inhuman to the needy as his ability is weighed, denies God what is His, swearing away His infinite mercy, which so protects the plight of the wretched that whatever generous dispensation is given to the poor, He testifies to have profited Himself. Even in the vows we make, having received divine blessings, we exist as debtors until we pay them with faithful mind. Therefore, what has been said about monetary debts should also be felt about other kinds of sins and various obligations by which we are held bound by eternal judgment, knowing this is why the comparison of a treasury to sins is made, because the root of all evils is greed, without whose corrupt seed scarcely any crimes are generated in the world. Here one commits murder to snatch what he covets from an innocent; another, tempted by a reward, becomes a false witness; some are driven to the debasement of adulterous commerce by the lure of vile redemption; others stain themselves with theft, others deny a deposit. There are many more similar crimes, always accompanied by the hungry love of gold, yet hardly any crime is admitted where the service of money does not assist. Therefore, having received the gift of divine piety and having obtained the impunity of heavenly forgiveness, let us not deny what we have received to one another, lest, having been absolved of greater debts, when we do not settle small ones, we are again entangled in the greatest chains. And soon that merciful Lord, the giver not the exactor of debt, who forgave us ten thousand talents, if He perceives us to strangle a fellow servant over a hundred denarii, may order us to be handed over to cruel torturers, demanding everything and thrown into prison custody, not to be allowed to leave until we pay all up to the last quadrans lost.

ET DIMITTE NOBIS DEBITA NOSTRA SICVT ET NOS DIMITTIMVS DEBITORIBVS NOSTRIS Si diligentius petitionis nostrae uota metiamur uel tribuendam nobis indulgentiam uel negandam propriis dinoscimus exemplis hoc enim sperare iubemur a Domino quod cernimur dimisisse conseruo quippe quos sponsio paris eadem condicionis adstringit ut debitores sicut esse nolumus ita nec habere cupiamus in aliorum namque personis aut absoluimur aut ligamur quodsi putatur incertum de quibus debitoribus hic agatur ponenda est excusationis infirmae materies et seu fortassis in culpa siue pecunia uel in quocumque tibi frater reus fuerit hoc relaxa nam et nos tam delictorum crebra praesumptio quam pecuniariae quantitatis inhonesta tractatio plurimis ostendit apud Deum nexibus inuolutos quisquis enim prout facultas uirium ponderatur egenti fuerit inhumanus Deo quae sua sunt infitiatus abiurat cuius pietas infinita miserorum sic tuetur angustias ut quicquid pauperi dispensatio benigna largitur sibi profecisse testetur in uotis etiam quae promittimus diuina beneficia consecuti debitores existimus donec ea fideli mente soluamus haec igitur quae de pecuniariis dicta sunt debitis etiam de ceteris peccatorum generibus ac diuersis quibus aeterno iudicio tenemur obstricti sentire nos conuenit scientes ob hoc aerariam similitudinem flagitiis comparatam quoniam radix omnium malorum est auaritia sine cuius semine uitioso nulla propemodum scelera generantur in mundo hic homicidium perpetrat ut innocenti quod affectauit eripiat alter praemio sollicitatus accepto mendacis testimonii fit iurator nonnullos ad lenocinium adulterini commercii coetus foedae redemptionis inpellit alii furto se maculant alii depositum negant sunt istis et plura similia quibus amica semper fames auri conmilitat nullum tamen facile crimen admittitur cui pecuniae ministerium minime suffragatur igitur diuinae pietatis munus indepti et inpunitatem caelestis indulgentiae consecuti quod accepimus inuicem non negemus ne maioribus absoluti cum parua non resoluimus maximis iterum uinculis inplicemur moxque Dominus ille misericors donator debiti non exactor qui talentorum nobis decem milia relaxauit si propter denarios centum senserit nos strangulare conseruum saeuis tradi tortoribus cuncta iubeat exigendo inque carceralem detrusi custodiam penitus egredi non sinamur donec luamus uniuersa usque ad modum ultimi quadrantis amissa.

AND LEAD US NOT INTO TEMPTATION not that the Lord, who is the path of light and the way of peace, leads anyone into the snares of temptation, but those who do not heed divine warnings, He allows to enter when He leaves them, for all who follow the slippery enticements of the world, enclosed in nets of delicious luxury, seek the sweet destruction, abandoned by the Lord who loves pure virtue, continue to enter wherever voluptuous temptation has dragged them. From this, therefore, let us strive to withdraw our foot back, rather crushing the narrow path which, by a narrow trail, unknown to many, leads steeply to the gate of the heavenly kingdoms.

ET NE NOS INDVCAS IN TEMPTATIONEM non quod Dominus qui lucis uia pacis est semita in laqueos quemquam temptationis inducat sed abhorrens diuinis monitis non parentes cum eos deserit introire permittit omnes enim qui lubrica sectantes mundi contagia retibus deliciosis inclusi luxus blandae perditionis affectant a Domino qui purae uirtutis amator est derelicti pergunt ingredi qua se temptatio uoluptuosa pertraxerit ab hac igitur pedem retro nitamur abducere semitam potius conterentes angustam quae tenui calle multis incognita caelestium regnorum subit arduam latenter ad portam.

BUT DELIVER US FROM EVIL when we pray to be delivered from evil, we confess it is good whom we ask to deliver us, and not unjustly is he who delivers to be followed, he who slays to be fled, for by this through good fruits is the tree of life, by the bad the root of ancient transgression. For the fruit is understood as declared by the gospel reading, where the Lord, opening the various minds of different people, commanded each to be recognized from his fruits, that is, from his works, saying, "By their fruits you shall know them." For as great a distance as heaven is separated from earth, fire from waters, light from darkness, peace from wars, life nevertheless from tombs, so by such a great removal of distance are goods distinguished from evils. For always a double choice serves our deliberation's discretion, by which we either hold the right path or the left, not unaware or doubtful, the right path being that of the just in the bosom of Father Abraham rejoicing, the left however appointed to the deep torments of the impious. Hence no one through such great chaos and the immense bulk of a sheer mass is able to cross over the danger. This, therefore, is the freedom we desire, that if we are deemed worthy to be sheep and lambs of the highest shepherd, we deserve to escape the fierce bites of the wolf and pluck a life now secure through the sweetest pastures of Christ, rich with the pleasantness of abundant flowers.

SED LIBERA NOS A MALO cum liberari nos a malo deprecamur bonum esse quem petimus ut nos liberet confitemur nec inmerito sectandus iste qui liberat ille fugiendus est qui trucidat in hoc enim per bonos fructus arbor est uitae in illo per malos radix praeuaricationis antiquae actus namque fructus intellegi euangelica lectio declarauit ubi Dominus uarias diuersorum mentes aperiens ex suis quemque fructibus id est ex operibus iussit agnosci dicens ex fructibus eorum cognoscetis eos siquidem quanta distantia caelum separatur a terris ignis ab aquis lumen a tenebris pax a bellis uita nihilominus a sepulchris tantum magnae remotionis abscessu longius bona discernuntur a malis duplex etenim semper electio deliberationis nostrae famulatur arbitrio quo uel dextrum teneamus tramitem uel sinistrum non ignari uel dubii dextram semitam esse iustorum in Abrahae Patri archae sinu laetantium laeuam uero profundis impiorum suppliciis deputatam unde nullus ad alterum per tam grande chaos et abruptae molis inmensum ualeat transmeare periculum haec est igitur nobis libertas optabilis ut oues et agni summi pastoris si fuerimus digni censeri toruos mereamur lupi morsus euadere atque suauissima Christi per pascua largi floris amoenitate gratissima uitam carpere iam securam.