Richard at Philosophy, et cetera has some interesting thoughts on respecting pseudonymity (link). I think most folks on the net agree with his primary conclusion with a small minority of vengeful folks falling into his proposed alternative.
-TurretinFan
Monday, June 08, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I have an over the head straightforward solution to this pseudonymity issue. It's "His Faith".
Whatever is not of His Faith is sin.
He did die for sinners and pseudonymities seeing there is nothing He is not quite aware of all the time.
I may not know you but by His Faith I rest in the fact that He does.
The rules of the game then should be, and are not always, I will trust the Lord with all my heart and lean not on my own understanding but in all my pseudonymity acknowledge Him and He will see to it that I do it anyway! :)
I was disturbed with only one word in his article and found it an inappropriate word to use in his article, which launched me onto thinking "what" would have been a better word to use than that one word, "p..s"?
"tick" would fit the bill, I thtink.
With a slight change to the syntax one could substitute ... anger, upset, provoke, etc.
-TurretinFan
yep!
Post a Comment