And the Gospel certainly does not teach me that God is up there, at a distance, guiding the production of a diverse and rich biblical canon that nevertheless contains a single finely-tuned system of theology that he expects his people to be obsessed with “getting right” (and lash out at those who don’t agree).But my God declares, by the mouth of Jude: "Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints." (Jude 3)
I don't adopts Enns' caricature of our position, but even his caricature highlights the difference between us. Enns does not think that the history of Genesis 1 is true history. He does not believe that God created the world in six days. If he does not believe what is plainly stated, should we be surprised that he doesn't appreciate debate over fine points of theology?