Someone in the comment box, using the nick "Kepha," pointed out that the Catechism of the Catholic Church actually has a section on this. I reproduce the section below:
II. THE NAME, TITLES, AND SYMBOLS OF THE HOLY SPIRITCute, eh? "Gift" doesn't even make the list of titles. Moreover, as another of the commenters noted, "personified donation" does sound rather modalistic.
The proper name of the Holy Spirit
691 "Holy Spirit" is the proper name of the one whom we adore and glorify with the Father and the Son. The Church has received this name from the Lord and professes it in the Baptism of her new children.16
The term "Spirit" translates the Hebrew word ruah, which, in its primary sense, means breath, air, wind. Jesus indeed uses the sensory image of the wind to suggest to Nicodemus the transcendent newness of him who is personally God's breath, the divine Spirit.17 On the other hand, "Spirit" and "Holy" are divine attributes common to the three divine persons. By joining the two terms, Scripture, liturgy, and theological language designate the inexpressible person of the Holy Spirit, without any possible equivocation with other uses of the terms "spirit" and "holy."
Titles of the Holy Spirit
692 When he proclaims and promises the coming of the Holy Spirit, Jesus calls him the "Paraclete," literally, "he who is called to one's side," ad-vocatus.18 "Paraclete" is commonly translated by "consoler," and Jesus is the first consoler.19 The Lord also called the Holy Spirit "the Spirit of truth."20
693 Besides the proper name of "Holy Spirit," which is most frequently used in the Acts of the Apostles and in the Epistles, we also find in St. Paul the titles: the Spirit of the promise,21 the Spirit of adoption,22 the Spirit of Christ,23 the Spirit of the Lord,24 and the Spirit of God25 - and, in St. Peter, the Spirit of glory.26
Taylor quotes Aquinas and Augustine. Whether he understands them is a point I won't explore. Nevertheless, whether or not they agree with the point he's trying to make, shouldn't the CCC trump anything that the fathers or schoolmen have to save about the subject?
-TurretinFan
H.T. to Steve Hays
-TurretinFan
2 comments:
The irony for me in this post is the places in Scripture Taylor Marshall goes to justify his renunciation of his Anglican vows to be a partaker of Rome's self made religious practices clearly devoid of the Holy Spirit and rather propelled by an elemental spirit of the world.
We do not fight flesh and blood but our fight is basis the eternal purpose, granted to us by the very Faith and Grace that saves the soul and conjoins the soul to Christ to become now a spiritual member of His Body as His soldier both in the invisible and the visible world so that as one of many of His members we, too, will manifest the manifold wisdom of God to the rulers and authorities in heavenly places.
He apparently was also wowed by all the extraneous adornments of the city state with Rome, Italy and the mystical phenomenons of religious practices one experiences when visiting the Vatican?
Colossians chapter 2 seems to me is a place we can take our stand against him because that chapter is diametrically opposed to his very public announcement that he makes in justifying why he left the Anglican communion to bring himself and wife and children to swim across the Tiber. Not to mention there is no admission of his own total depravity and absolute need for the mercies and grace of God by which He saves His Elect and puts them in His Body as He wills!
Dear TurretinFan,
Be straight with me: did you really expect to find an exhaustive list of titles for the Holy Spirit in the Catechism?
I, too, am irritated at times by Taylor Marshall. But that's no excuse to forget charity and write from your spleen.
Grace be with you,
Strossmayer
Post a Comment