Another case of a sex abusing priest who was shuffled off to another parish without the police being alerted was recently report (link to story)(Updated link provided by a diligent reader). There are doubtless some people who will be glad to learn that this abuser was neither a pedophile nor a homosexual (though the priest's sexual preferences seem to have been for acts that don't require an adult woman). Two archbishops are implicated by the story: former archbishop Harry Flynn (now Archbishop Emeritus) and his successor archbishop John Nienstedt. In an interesting ironic twist, Harry Flynn is (or at least was) chairman of a United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) committee on sexual abuse (of course, there's an even worse irony that recently came to light with respect to the investigation of paedophilia by Rome's finest).
But what of it? After all, we recently heard about a story of sexual abuse by men from a college football program. What's the difference? One difference is that Rome claims to be a divinely ordained organization, "the Church," and not simply a self-perpetuating institution seeking worldly fame and glory. A football program fits the latter category.
Another difference is that this is the first such scandal for that college. It's not the first such scandal for Rome.
A third difference is that, from what we can tell, those in the football program actually did report the abuse to the appropriate authorities.
Perhaps we could go on and on. The bottom line, however, is that both scandals illustrate institutions that seem to think that they are not required to play by the same rules as the rest of society - which think that they are above the law, for lack of a better term.
I don't think Christ came to establish a denomination. That said, if Christ had established a denomination, would we expect it to be better or worse than a college football program?